Benghazi: “It’s gone, baby. It’s in your head. That’s the only place”

[MarcATL]

What "action" by Obama has struck fear in Assad's heart? The "threat" of hitting Syria with a few Cruise missiles after giving Assad WEEKS to move anything of value? That's a joke and if you weren't such an Obama ass kisser you'd admit it.

You really think that the Russians are going to get Assad to change? They've been the ones ENABLING Assad for years now! Putin is playing Barry like the neophyte that Obama is. Putin is now going to be the one "chaperoning" Assad? Really? Putin has to be rolling on the floor at the Kremlin over that one.

What job has gotten done? Assad gassed people...Obama said he'd act if that happened...and he's done NOTHING. He was about to get his ass handed to him with the looming vote in Congress and he jumped all over the Putin proposal because it gave him an out.

My prediction now is that Putin will do little or nothing about chemical weapons that Assad has and that Barry will make a few speeches about that to try and save face before tucking tail.

Your hysterics and crystal balling aside...

Are you for putting troops on the ground in Syria or not?

By Obama taking the vote to Congress and making very strong campaigns nationally and abroad on his plans to retaliate, you can bet your bottom dollar that Assad is afraid.

The first thing he did was run to Charlie Rose, where he showed his fear to the world. "Please Obama, don't bomb us." That got the ball rolling into Putin admitting that chemical weapons were used and saying that he'd work with Assad to get that situation under control.

Your partisan hatred for Obama is absolutely preventing you from seeing the bang up job he's doing.

Unless of course, you want all out war...do you?

 

[kwc57]

In what way is Putin making Obama "his bitch" as you put it?

Detail it please.

Thanks.

Do you not pay attention to anything that happens politically in the world? How has Putin NOT made Obama his "bitch"? From Putin's rejection of the Obama's "reset" of American-Russian relations...to his granting asylum to Edward Snowden...to the OpEd piece he just did with the New York Times...Putin REVELS in giving abuse to Barry.

Obama's actions has led Assad to admit he has chemicals. The next step is to admit yes, he did authorize that checmical attack on his people.
Obama struck fear in Assad's heart.
Who cares if Putin, is being Putin and trying to sneak in on the credit.
The bottom line is the job is getting done, W/O American troops on the ground.
Versus GWB talking about the job is done, when it hasn't even started yet.
WTF is wrong w/you people?

I bet you ride a unicorn on streets of glitter when you go pick up your check don't you comrade?

 

[dilloduck]

In what way is Putin making Obama "his bitch" as you put it?

Detail it please.

Thanks.

Do you not pay attention to anything that happens politically in the world? How has Putin NOT made Obama his "bitch"? From Putin's rejection of the Obama's "reset" of American-Russian relations...to his granting asylum to Edward Snowden...to the OpEd piece he just did with the New York Times...Putin REVELS in giving abuse to Barry.

Obama's actions has led Assad to admit he has chemicals. The next step is to admit yes, he did authorize that checmical attack on his people.
Obama struck fear in Assad's heart.
Who cares if Putin, is being Putin and trying to sneak in on the credit.
The bottom line is the job is getting done, W/O American troops on the ground.
Versus GWB talking about the job is done, when it hasn't even started yet.
WTF is wrong w/you people?

Lies---Syria admitted to having and threatened to use chemical weapons over a year ago----Y'all need some new talking points. Lots of you are trying that little lie.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/24/w...rebellion-syria-says.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 

[Stephanie]

But conservatives have been lying about the president for so many years they have no idea what the truth is, and their minds are so blinded by hatred that they accept and believe the lies without question.

Wait! Don't tell me. It's because he's black, right?

I think mostly because he is smarter than all the Republican candidates, including Romney and you can throw in Palin too, put together.

that is a true loving yet misguided cult member...the Obama's approvals are now in the 30's yet he is smarter than everyone in the WHOLE WIDE WORLD

Do you kiss his picture goodnight before you hit the sack

 

[mamooth]

I do wish all the Republicans here would finally stop tapdancing on the graves of the Benghazi dead. Decent Americans feel like puking when we watch them do that. Nobody wants to see how so many of their conservative countrymen are party-before-country near-treasonous ratfuks. We already know, so we don't need to reminded.

 

[007]

"Let them die" -- Obama's verdict on the Benghazi Consulate calls for help

Link?

Actions speak louder than words.

 

[Stephanie]

I do wish all the Republicans here would finally stop tapdancing on the graves of the Benghazi dead. Decent Americans feel like puking when we watch them do that. Nobody wants to see how so many of their conservative countrymen are party-before-country near-treasonous ratfuks. We already know, so we don't need to reminded.

yeah and we have wished you lefties-liberals-Democrarts would STOP tap dancing on the graves of our military from the Iraq war...but you all haven't and PROBABLY never will as long as you CAN USE them... so you can wish in one hand and poo poo in the other see which one fills first

you can go to hell accusing people who want answers from this screw up of OBama's of being, treasononus ratfucks...you hateful unpatriotic unAmercian puke

 

[mudwhistle]

I do wish all the Republicans here would finally stop tapdancing on the graves of the Benghazi dead. Decent Americans feel like puking when we watch them do that. Nobody wants to see how so many of their conservative countrymen are party-before-country near-treasonous ratfuks. We already know, so we don't need to reminded.

Sorry, but the lies about a friggen video have erased any moral high ground you might have had with respect to this issue.

We cannot allow the White House to stonewall us and hide the truth.

 

[Wyld Kard]

Post it then Palooka.

Don't gimme dat, "I already posted it" or "you wouldn't believe me if I did" claptrap that you Far RW radical reactionaries trot out when backed into a corner.

Put up or shut up.

Post it maggot...post it.

Here you go, dumbass.

LMFAO. You liberals are pathetic.
That's hilarious, you think I'm backed into a corner.

The Washington Post Confirms Obama Is Lying About Benghazi

The Washington Post Confirms Obama Is Lying About Benghazi | Lubbock Online | Lubbock Avalanche-Journal

What was that you said? Oh yeah......

you guys have nothing on Obama...NOTHING

So, you're taking an article that claims Obama "lied" about the source of the attack when we all know that General Petraeus, who was director of CIA agreed on the talking points, that were written by the CIA and given to Rice to air on TV?

So, it turns out that Obama did not lie but just reported what the CIA deemed to be appropriate to report. So, that's it? That's what you have on Obama?

Bwahahahaha! Major Fail.

At the most fundamental level, the reason it is absurd to suspect the existence of a “cover-up” over the Benghazi attack is that such a cover-up could not have had any conceivable goal. Back to the beginning: the underlying accusation about Benghazi is that the Obama administration deliberately mischaracterized the terrorist attack there as having grown out of a spontaneous demonstration because that would be less politically damaging. Such a cover-up would have made no sense because the attack would not have been less politically damaging had it grown out of a spontaneous demonstration. The attack on the Benghazi compound would not have been any less politically difficult for the administration if it had grown out of a riot, nor would any normal voter have expected it to be less politically damaging, nor would any normal campaign strategist have expected any normal voter to have expected it to be less politically damaging. Had Susan Rice gone on the talk shows on September 15th and inaccurately stated that the attackers had been wearing green pants, when in fact their pants had been red, there would be no reason to suspect this to be part of a political “cover-up”, because no American voters could conceivably have cared either way.

Read more: Stirring Scandal Where None Exists - GOP Fail With ?Benghazi-Gate? -

Bwahahahaha! Major Denial.

Were you drunk on Obama's Kool-Aid you posted the crap that you did. Excuses, excuses, excuses. It's so predictable with you libtards, because that's what you do. Make excuses for Obama, while still being in denial.

The Rise of Al-Qaeda and Why the Administration Lied about Benghazi
August 4th, 2013 - 9:23 pm

For nearly a year, we have had no answer to why the administration lied about Benghazi — why it told the world, not to mention the parents of our murdered SEALs at the funeral of their sons, that the cause of that fatal conflagration was an anti-Islamic video no one saw, when the various arms of our executive branch (White House, State and intelligence) already knew, or strongly suspected, it was a terror attack orchestrated by al-Qaeda affiliates.

You only have to read the now infamous talking points to know that.

That this lie was deeply immoral is obvious. What still eludes us is the cause of that lie, other than the equally obvious desire to avoid embarrassment weeks before a presidential election.

Read more: Roger L. Simon » The Rise of Al-Qaeda and Why the Administration Lied about Benghazi

So, it turns out that Obama did not lie

Yeah, you keep reassuring yourself of that, Obot.

 

[MarcATL]

This is a test. This is only a Test.: Ben-GAH-Zeeeeeeee......

 

[whitehall]

Now it's revealed that the CIA has been (illegally?) hiding Benghazi witnesses for a year. The administrations claims that they refuse to testify before congress. Still no outrage in the liberal media and stooge Juan Williams still insists the entire disaster was "in our minds".

 

[Oldstyle]

What "action" by Obama has struck fear in Assad's heart? The "threat" of hitting Syria with a few Cruise missiles after giving Assad WEEKS to move anything of value? That's a joke and if you weren't such an Obama ass kisser you'd admit it.

You really think that the Russians are going to get Assad to change? They've been the ones ENABLING Assad for years now! Putin is playing Barry like the neophyte that Obama is. Putin is now going to be the one "chaperoning" Assad? Really? Putin has to be rolling on the floor at the Kremlin over that one.

What job has gotten done? Assad gassed people...Obama said he'd act if that happened...and he's done NOTHING. He was about to get his ass handed to him with the looming vote in Congress and he jumped all over the Putin proposal because it gave him an out.

My prediction now is that Putin will do little or nothing about chemical weapons that Assad has and that Barry will make a few speeches about that to try and save face before tucking tail.

Your hysterics and crystal balling aside...

Are you for putting troops on the ground in Syria or not?

By Obama taking the vote to Congress and making very strong campaigns nationally and abroad on his plans to retaliate, you can bet your bottom dollar that Assad is afraid.

The first thing he did was run to Charlie Rose, where he showed his fear to the world. "Please Obama, don't bomb us." That got the ball rolling into Putin admitting that chemical weapons were used and saying that he'd work with Assad to get that situation under control.

Your partisan hatred for Obama is absolutely preventing you from seeing the bang up job he's doing.

Unless of course, you want all out war...do you?

Only an idiot would put troops into Syria. Only an idiot would support the Syrian opposition when it's composed of so many Islamic extremists.

The reason that Obama was about to lose the vote in Congress over Syria isn't because anyone there thinks Assad ISN'T a despot who has done something despicable...it's because the so called "attack" that Obama wanted to launch wasn't going to DO anything to Assad because this Administration has FINALLY figured out that replacing despots in Libya and Egypt with Islamic fundamentalists isn't an improvement. Obama CAN'T get rid of Assad because the people who would move into the power vacuum left behind would be Iranian backed Islamic extremists.

So the strike that Obama was proposing was nothing more than theater. We would have spent millions and hit nothing...all the while being vilified around the world for being a superpower "bully". The reason that Obama jumped at Putin's suggestion is that he'd painted himself into a corner with his red line comment and was desperate for an out. That ISN'T Obama doing a "bang up" job...that's him bumbling his way through yet another foreign policy decision.

 

[MarcATL]

Only an idiot would put troops into Syria. Only an idiot would support the Syrian opposition when it's composed of so many Islamic extremists.

The reason that Obama was about to lose the vote in Congress over Syria isn't because anyone there thinks Assad ISN'T a despot who has done something despicable...it's because the so called "attack" that Obama wanted to launch wasn't going to DO anything to Assad because this Administration has FINALLY figured out that replacing despots in Libya and Egypt with Islamic fundamentalists isn't an improvement. Obama CAN'T get rid of Assad because the people who would move into the power vacuum left behind would be Iranian backed Islamic extremists.

So the strike that Obama was proposing was nothing more than theater. We would have spent millions and hit nothing...all the while being vilified around the world for being a superpower "bully". The reason that Obama jumped at Putin's suggestion is that he'd painted himself into a corner with his red line comment and was desperate for an out. That ISN'T Obama doing a "bang up" job...that's him bumbling his way through yet another foreign policy decision.

Don't you get it?

By your own words, Obama bluffed, and the bluff worked. Assad came out and said "OK. OK, I do have chemical weapons. Please don't bomb us or we'll have to do whatever it takes to defend ourselves. Let's see what kind of deal we can work out...okay?"

Then Putin took his shirt off and strut his stuff, and took center stage.

And you Far RWers consider that Putin played Obama. Putin did jack squat. If he did something, please spell out what he did and how he played Obama.

Do you honestly think for a second that Obama DIDN'T know that neither the American People or Congress wanted to go into another war? Especially considering he ran both times that he'd be the guy NOT to get us into unnecessary wars.

If you really believe that Obama got played you are high on Meth and Crack. At the same damn time. At the same. damn. time.

While you and your ilk are playing checkers thinking you're taking the other guy's pieces, Obama's playing chess ready to mate the queen.

 

[S.J.]

Only an idiot would put troops into Syria. Only an idiot would support the Syrian opposition when it's composed of so many Islamic extremists.

The reason that Obama was about to lose the vote in Congress over Syria isn't because anyone there thinks Assad ISN'T a despot who has done something despicable...it's because the so called "attack" that Obama wanted to launch wasn't going to DO anything to Assad because this Administration has FINALLY figured out that replacing despots in Libya and Egypt with Islamic fundamentalists isn't an improvement. Obama CAN'T get rid of Assad because the people who would move into the power vacuum left behind would be Iranian backed Islamic extremists.

So the strike that Obama was proposing was nothing more than theater. We would have spent millions and hit nothing...all the while being vilified around the world for being a superpower "bully". The reason that Obama jumped at Putin's suggestion is that he'd painted himself into a corner with his red line comment and was desperate for an out. That ISN'T Obama doing a "bang up" job...that's him bumbling his way through yet another foreign policy decision.

Don't you get it?

By your own words, Obama bluffed, and the bluff worked. Assad came out and said "OK. OK, I do have chemical weapons. Please don't bomb us or we'll have to do whatever it takes to defend ourselves. Let's see what kind of deal we can work out...okay?"

Then Putin took his shirt off and strut his stuff, and took center stage.

And you Far RWers consider that Putin played Obama. Putin did jack squat. If he did something, please spell out what he did and how he played Obama.

Do you honestly think for a second that Obama DIDN'T know that neither the American People or Congress wanted to go into another war? Especially considering he ran both times that he'd be the guy NOT to get us into unnecessary wars.

If you really believe that Obama got played you are high on Meth and Crack. At the same damn time. At the same. damn. time.

While you and your ilk are playing checkers thinking you're taking the other guy's pieces, Obama's playing chess ready to mate the queen.

And I thought Chris Matthews had HIS head up Obama's ass.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

After more than a year now the fact remains that the partisan right has failed to prove its case, conservatives have failed to provide any evidence of ‘presidential wrongdoing’ that would warrant impeachment by the House and the president being found guilty in the Senate of any ‘crime.’

Conservatives, of course, claim they’ve provided such ‘evidence’ but whine about that ‘evidence’ being ignored by a ‘liberal media’ and ‘liberal political establishment,’ both of whom are ‘in the bag’ for Obama.

The irony of this is that from the outset ‘Benghazi’ was about politics, not the truth or justice for those who died. It was about what republicans saw as an opportunity to ‘get rid’ of Obama. Consequently the voters and the American people saw ‘Benghazi’ for what it really was: a partisan power grab, just as disingenuous as the other lies and falsehoods about Obama contrived by the right.

 

[S.J.]

The irony of this is that from the outset ‘Benghazi’ was about politics, not the truth or justice for those who died. It was about what republicans saw as an opportunity to ‘get rid’ of Obama. Consequently the voters and the American people saw ‘Benghazi’ for what it really was: a partisan power grab, just as disingenuous as the other lies and falsehoods about Obama contrived by the right.

Yeah? Tell that to the families of the victims, ASSHOLE.

 

[kwc57]

I do wish all the Republicans here would finally stop tapdancing on the graves of the Benghazi dead. Decent Americans feel like puking when we watch them do that. Nobody wants to see how so many of their conservative countrymen are party-before-country near-treasonous ratfuks. We already know, so we don't need to reminded.

Negged for being a partisan hack. No one is tap dancing on their graves dicklips. They died needlessly while in service to their country. We don't want them dishonored and the stonewalling and ignoring the issue is exactly that, dishonor. Decent Americans want answers and someone held accountable for the decisions made that cost these people their lives. But party before country hacks like you try to spin it otherwise to protect Dear Leader. Fuck you very much.

 

[Oldstyle]

Only an idiot would put troops into Syria. Only an idiot would support the Syrian opposition when it's composed of so many Islamic extremists.

The reason that Obama was about to lose the vote in Congress over Syria isn't because anyone there thinks Assad ISN'T a despot who has done something despicable...it's because the so called "attack" that Obama wanted to launch wasn't going to DO anything to Assad because this Administration has FINALLY figured out that replacing despots in Libya and Egypt with Islamic fundamentalists isn't an improvement. Obama CAN'T get rid of Assad because the people who would move into the power vacuum left behind would be Iranian backed Islamic extremists.

So the strike that Obama was proposing was nothing more than theater. We would have spent millions and hit nothing...all the while being vilified around the world for being a superpower "bully". The reason that Obama jumped at Putin's suggestion is that he'd painted himself into a corner with his red line comment and was desperate for an out. That ISN'T Obama doing a "bang up" job...that's him bumbling his way through yet another foreign policy decision.

Don't you get it?

By your own words, Obama bluffed, and the bluff worked. Assad came out and said "OK. OK, I do have chemical weapons. Please don't bomb us or we'll have to do whatever it takes to defend ourselves. Let's see what kind of deal we can work out...okay?"

Then Putin took his shirt off and strut his stuff, and took center stage.

And you Far RWers consider that Putin played Obama. Putin did jack squat. If he did something, please spell out what he did and how he played Obama.

Do you honestly think for a second that Obama DIDN'T know that neither the American People or Congress wanted to go into another war? Especially considering he ran both times that he'd be the guy NOT to get us into unnecessary wars.

If you really believe that Obama got played you are high on Meth and Crack. At the same damn time. At the same. damn. time.

While you and your ilk are playing checkers thinking you're taking the other guy's pieces, Obama's playing chess ready to mate the queen.

You're amazing. Obama has totally been played by Putin and Assad during this entire situation and somehow you think Barry is the "chess master"? You're naive enough to think that the so called threat of a few Cruise missiles fired at nothing brought Assad to the table? Obama couldn't even convince Democrats to vote for his threatened strike...how worried do you think Assad was that it would take place?

So what happens now when Assad doesn't follow through on whatever joke of an agreement John Kerry wins in negotiations? I ask that question because I'm certain that WILL be the case. Putin was astute enough to realize that Obama was teetering on the edge of a very embarrassing loss in Congress and was desperate for any solution that would give him even a semblance of a graceful way out.

At the moment Putin is the puppet master and both Obama and Kerry is dancing at the ends of his strings.

 

[Oldstyle]

After more than a year now the fact remains that the partisan right has failed to prove its case, conservatives have failed to provide any evidence of ‘presidential wrongdoing’ that would warrant impeachment by the House and the president being found guilty in the Senate of any ‘crime.’

Conservatives, of course, claim they’ve provided such ‘evidence’ but whine about that ‘evidence’ being ignored by a ‘liberal media’ and ‘liberal political establishment,’ both of whom are ‘in the bag’ for Obama.

The irony of this is that from the outset ‘Benghazi’ was about politics, not the truth or justice for those who died. It was about what republicans saw as an opportunity to ‘get rid’ of Obama. Consequently the voters and the American people saw ‘Benghazi’ for what it really was: a partisan power grab, just as disingenuous as the other lies and falsehoods about Obama contrived by the right.

Nothing has been "proven" in regards to Benghazi because more than a year after our Ambassador and three other Americans were murdered by Islamic extremists, this White House continues to obstruct the investigation into what took place before, during and after the attack.

The "most transparent Administration in history" has been anything but. They resemble the White House of Richard M. Nixon.

 

[American_Jihad]

US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum - Search Results

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ey-fought-for-their-lives-34.html#post6228447

What did the obongo gang do right in Benghazi...
​

What did the obongo gang do right in Benghazi...

List with links...

I'v noticed that some of the left have tried to moved to the center and are blaming the left and right...ROLMAO