Being Liberal Makes You a Fascist

[Pheonixops]

"Knowing this administration's record, I wasn't surprised by its Libyan disinformation campaign, Israeli-Iranian arms-for-hostages swap, or illegal funding of the Contras. All this has contributed to my disenchantment with the Republican Party, and helped me make up my mind.

I want to totally disassociate myself from the policies that have given us unprecedented deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, an irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking, and the attack on our personal liberties and privacy."

This is the conservative icon Ronald Reagan? Is this the "party of Reagan" touted by conservatives today?

 

[kaz]

This is how we got here:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/356943-being-liberal-makes-you-a-fascist-2.html#post9176279

LOL, you mean the one mocking liberals for this one?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/356987-fascism-is-a-conservative-form-of-government.html

No, I was referring to that specific post the link goes to.

LOL, because of course,

Conservatives are Fascists!

Yawn.

Liberals are Facsists!

What! How can you say that! That's ridiculous.

LOL. Your indignation is noted... LOL

 

[Pete7469]

LOL, you mean the one mocking liberals for this one?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/356987-fascism-is-a-conservative-form-of-government.html

No, I was referring to that specific post the link goes to.

LOL, because of course,

Conservatives are Fascists!

Yawn.

Liberals are Facsists!

What! How can you say that! That's ridiculous.

LOL. Your indignation is noted... LOL

Same with their indignation at being called bed wetters. They're consumed by their own self consciousness, insecurity, and inability to be anything other than failures.

They're oxygen thieves of the highest degree, and subconsciously they know it.

If it wasn't for redundant safety standards the idiots could not have survived childhood.




[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffrZGwVIj0U"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffrZGwVIj0U[/ame]




I think their parents should have been aborted.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Under Progressive President Woodrow Wilson America was the first Fascist nation.
Newspapers and magazines were closed for criticizing the government
Almost 100,000 government propaganda agents were sent out to whip up support for the regime and the war
Nearly a quarter million ‘goons’ were given legal authority to beat and intimidate ‘slackers’ and dissenters.
http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/Classical_Liberalism_vs_Modern_Liberal_Conservatism.pdf p. 9

I found this interesting post by you from 2009, in a thread about torture, when you were defending torture:

"An unfortunate characteristic of our liberal brethren is the inability to see beyond the “feel good” self-pat-on-the-back attempt at moral superiority, a childlike “can’t we all just get along.”

Never is this flaw more evident than when we attempt to confront evil. Liberals, it seems, are unable to recognize evil, and therefore are psychologically unable to deal with it.
We see this in our left-leaning friends ability to identify with the victimizer, but not the victim. We see it in the consoling of the drug abusing, law breaking criminal, but detachment from the recipient of their criminality.

Our great leaders have all understood this, and each dealt with evil in ways outside of our Constitutional methods.

Abraham Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus in 1861 and 1862. The Peace Democrats, also called copperheads, publicly criticized Lincoln's belief that violating the U.S. Constitution was required to save it as a whole.

Franklin Roosevelt opened the mail, censored the press and built internment camps (Executive Order No. 9066 in December 1941.)

When the threat of evil had been emasculated, the infractions to our civility were removed, and we returned to the way of life that we exemplified. (See Ex-parte Milligan).

And those on the left, like yourself, returned to carping about how terrible our leaders were."

Everyone read the above carefully. PC is PRAISING Presidents for violating the Constitution...calling it greatness...

... but she's doing it of course when it better suited her agenda to endorse such actions.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1212130-post122.html

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is what conservatives have been reduced to in their state of intellectual bankruptcy...

"...we can't debate you on the issues, but we're going to call you bad names like 'fascist!!' if you don't stop being liberal!"

good luck with that.

I refer to liars...and look who shows up.

 

[NYcarbineer]

This is what conservatives have been reduced to in their state of intellectual bankruptcy...

"...we can't debate you on the issues, but we're going to call you bad names like 'fascist!!' if you don't stop being liberal!"

good luck with that.

I refer to liars...and look who shows up.

Read post 244, your tribute to presidents who violate the Constitution, and get used to it, because it will be posted in every thread you start on this subject that contradicts it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is what conservatives have been reduced to in their state of intellectual bankruptcy...

"...we can't debate you on the issues, but we're going to call you bad names like 'fascist!!' if you don't stop being liberal!"

good luck with that.

I refer to liars...and look who shows up.

Read post 244, your tribute to presidents who violate the Constitution, and get used to it, because it will be posted in every thread you start on this subject that contradicts it.

Autographs available.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I refer to liars...and look who shows up.

Read post 244, your tribute to presidents who violate the Constitution, and get used to it, because it will be posted in every thread you start on this subject that contradicts it.

Autographs available.

At least someone here can render you speechless. Pretend to ignore it on the hopes everyone else will. That might work.

 

[GreenBean]

"Knowing this administration's record, I wasn't surprised by its Libyan disinformation campaign, Israeli-Iranian arms-for-hostages swap, or illegal funding of the Contras. All this has contributed to my disenchantment with the Republican Party, and helped me make up my mind.

I want to totally disassociate myself from the policies that have given us unprecedented deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, an irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking, and the attack on our personal liberties and privacy."

This is the conservative icon Ronald Reagan? Is this the "party of Reagan" touted by conservatives today?

I want to totally disassociate myself from the policies that have given us unprecedented deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, an irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking, and the attack on our personal liberties and privacy."

Oh I see ... you want to do away with all that - okay -then you're a Republican at Heart .

 

[NYcarbineer]

Under Progressive President Woodrow Wilson America was the first Fascist nation.
Newspapers and magazines were closed for criticizing the government
Almost 100,000 government propaganda agents were sent out to whip up support for the regime and the war
Nearly a quarter million ‘goons’ were given legal authority to beat and intimidate ‘slackers’ and dissenters.
http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/Classical_Liberalism_vs_Modern_Liberal_Conservatism.pdf p. 9

I found this interesting post by you from 2009, in a thread about torture, when you were defending torture:

"An unfortunate characteristic of our liberal brethren is the inability to see beyond the “feel good” self-pat-on-the-back attempt at moral superiority, a childlike “can’t we all just get along.”

Never is this flaw more evident than when we attempt to confront evil. Liberals, it seems, are unable to recognize evil, and therefore are psychologically unable to deal with it.
We see this in our left-leaning friends ability to identify with the victimizer, but not the victim. We see it in the consoling of the drug abusing, law breaking criminal, but detachment from the recipient of their criminality.

Our great leaders have all understood this, and each dealt with evil in ways outside of our Constitutional methods.

Abraham Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus in 1861 and 1862. The Peace Democrats, also called copperheads, publicly criticized Lincoln's belief that violating the U.S. Constitution was required to save it as a whole.

Franklin Roosevelt opened the mail, censored the press and built internment camps (Executive Order No. 9066 in December 1941.)

When the threat of evil had been emasculated, the infractions to our civility were removed, and we returned to the way of life that we exemplified. (See Ex-parte Milligan).

And those on the left, like yourself, returned to carping about how terrible our leaders were."

Everyone read the above carefully. PC is PRAISING Presidents for violating the Constitution...calling it greatness...

... but she's doing it of course when it better suited her agenda to endorse such actions.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1212130-post122.html

And to make this even better, while PC praises FDR above for the internment of the Japanese, as necessary to 'emasculate' a threat of evil, she says below, at another time, in another thread (where she has a different agenda) the following:

Japanese interment policy?

It was not based on national security....as you probably believe.
It was based on the wishes to accrue votes for the Democrats.

The internment of 110,000 Japanese seems to have been largely political. Earl Warren of California was sensitive to his constituents resenting the large success of the Japanese in agriculture. And, interned, they couldn’t vote against FDR, and he did pick up three House seats…and after the election he began to move for the release of the Japanese.
From "FDR Goes To War," by Folsom and Folsom

Wadda guy, your hero.

Hmmm....one day she praises it profusely, another day she reviles it with equal zeal.

I wonder if that is schizophrenia of some sort, or just a weak mind failing to keep track of one lie to the next?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/7684443-post94.html

 

[PoliticalChic]

Under Progressive President Woodrow Wilson America was the first Fascist nation.
Newspapers and magazines were closed for criticizing the government
Almost 100,000 government propaganda agents were sent out to whip up support for the regime and the war
Nearly a quarter million ‘goons’ were given legal authority to beat and intimidate ‘slackers’ and dissenters.
http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/Classical_Liberalism_vs_Modern_Liberal_Conservatism.pdf p. 9

I found this interesting post by you from 2009, in a thread about torture, when you were defending torture:

"An unfortunate characteristic of our liberal brethren is the inability to see beyond the “feel good” self-pat-on-the-back attempt at moral superiority, a childlike “can’t we all just get along.”

Never is this flaw more evident than when we attempt to confront evil. Liberals, it seems, are unable to recognize evil, and therefore are psychologically unable to deal with it.
We see this in our left-leaning friends ability to identify with the victimizer, but not the victim. We see it in the consoling of the drug abusing, law breaking criminal, but detachment from the recipient of their criminality.

Our great leaders have all understood this, and each dealt with evil in ways outside of our Constitutional methods.

Abraham Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus in 1861 and 1862. The Peace Democrats, also called copperheads, publicly criticized Lincoln's belief that violating the U.S. Constitution was required to save it as a whole.

Franklin Roosevelt opened the mail, censored the press and built internment camps (Executive Order No. 9066 in December 1941.)

When the threat of evil had been emasculated, the infractions to our civility were removed, and we returned to the way of life that we exemplified. (See Ex-parte Milligan).

And those on the left, like yourself, returned to carping about how terrible our leaders were."

Everyone read the above carefully. PC is PRAISING Presidents for violating the Constitution...calling it greatness...

... but she's doing it of course when it better suited her agenda to endorse such actions.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1212130-post122.html

And to make this even better, while PC praises FDR above for the internment of the Japanese, as necessary to 'emasculate' a threat of evil, she says below, at another time, in another thread (where she has a different agenda) the following:

Japanese interment policy?

It was not based on national security....as you probably believe.
It was based on the wishes to accrue votes for the Democrats.

The internment of 110,000 Japanese seems to have been largely political. Earl Warren of California was sensitive to his constituents resenting the large success of the Japanese in agriculture. And, interned, they couldn’t vote against FDR, and he did pick up three House seats…and after the election he began to move for the release of the Japanese.
From "FDR Goes To War," by Folsom and Folsom

Wadda guy, your hero.

Hmmm....one day she praises it profusely, another day she reviles it with equal zeal.

I wonder if that is schizophrenia of some sort, or just a weak mind failing to keep track of one lie to the next?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/7684443-post94.html

It does't say any such thing...

Moron.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I found this interesting post by you from 2009, in a thread about torture, when you were defending torture:

"An unfortunate characteristic of our liberal brethren is the inability to see beyond the “feel good” self-pat-on-the-back attempt at moral superiority, a childlike “can’t we all just get along.”

Never is this flaw more evident than when we attempt to confront evil. Liberals, it seems, are unable to recognize evil, and therefore are psychologically unable to deal with it.
We see this in our left-leaning friends ability to identify with the victimizer, but not the victim. We see it in the consoling of the drug abusing, law breaking criminal, but detachment from the recipient of their criminality.

Our great leaders have all understood this, and each dealt with evil in ways outside of our Constitutional methods.

Abraham Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus in 1861 and 1862. The Peace Democrats, also called copperheads, publicly criticized Lincoln's belief that violating the U.S. Constitution was required to save it as a whole.

Franklin Roosevelt opened the mail, censored the press and built internment camps (Executive Order No. 9066 in December 1941.)

When the threat of evil had been emasculated, the infractions to our civility were removed, and we returned to the way of life that we exemplified. (See Ex-parte Milligan).

And those on the left, like yourself, returned to carping about how terrible our leaders were."

Everyone read the above carefully. PC is PRAISING Presidents for violating the Constitution...calling it greatness...

... but she's doing it of course when it better suited her agenda to endorse such actions.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1212130-post122.html

And to make this even better, while PC praises FDR above for the internment of the Japanese, as necessary to 'emasculate' a threat of evil, she says below, at another time, in another thread (where she has a different agenda) the following:

Japanese interment policy?

It was not based on national security....as you probably believe.
It was based on the wishes to accrue votes for the Democrats.

The internment of 110,000 Japanese seems to have been largely political. Earl Warren of California was sensitive to his constituents resenting the large success of the Japanese in agriculture. And, interned, they couldn’t vote against FDR, and he did pick up three House seats…and after the election he began to move for the release of the Japanese.
From "FDR Goes To War," by Folsom and Folsom

Wadda guy, your hero.

Hmmm....one day she praises it profusely, another day she reviles it with equal zeal.

I wonder if that is schizophrenia of some sort, or just a weak mind failing to keep track of one lie to the next?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/7684443-post94.html

It does't say any such thing...

Moron.

Which part do you wish to do deny? I have you on record saying that the internment camps were justifiable and praiseworthy.

I have you on record saying the internment camps were just political ploy to get votes and had nothing to do with national security.

Those are BOTH your opinions, and they are irreconcilable. You do this all the time. You flip flop from one side of an issue to the other just so you can disagree with or take some cheap shot at some liberal.

You are intellectually dysfunctional. Stop being intellectually dysfunctional.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And to make this even better, while PC praises FDR above for the internment of the Japanese, as necessary to 'emasculate' a threat of evil, she says below, at another time, in another thread (where she has a different agenda) the following:

Japanese interment policy?

It was not based on national security....as you probably believe.
It was based on the wishes to accrue votes for the Democrats.

The internment of 110,000 Japanese seems to have been largely political. Earl Warren of California was sensitive to his constituents resenting the large success of the Japanese in agriculture. And, interned, they couldn’t vote against FDR, and he did pick up three House seats…and after the election he began to move for the release of the Japanese.
From "FDR Goes To War," by Folsom and Folsom

Wadda guy, your hero.

Hmmm....one day she praises it profusely, another day she reviles it with equal zeal.

I wonder if that is schizophrenia of some sort, or just a weak mind failing to keep track of one lie to the next?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/7684443-post94.html

It does't say any such thing...

Moron.

Which part do you wish to do deny? I have you on record saying that the internment camps were justifiable and praiseworthy.

I have you on record saying the internment camps were just political ploy to get votes and had nothing to do with national security.

Those are BOTH your opinions, and they are irreconcilable. You do this all the time. You flip flop from one side of an issue to the other just so you can disagree with or take some cheap shot at some liberal.

You are intellectually dysfunctional. Stop being intellectually dysfunctional.

What I really like is how you build your entire existence around me, because you recognize both brilliance, and the fact that I am never wrong.

Enlightenment, my role.


Groveling, yours.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It does't say any such thing...

Moron.

Which part do you wish to do deny? I have you on record saying that the internment camps were justifiable and praiseworthy.

I have you on record saying the internment camps were just political ploy to get votes and had nothing to do with national security.

Those are BOTH your opinions, and they are irreconcilable. You do this all the time. You flip flop from one side of an issue to the other just so you can disagree with or take some cheap shot at some liberal.

You are intellectually dysfunctional. Stop being intellectually dysfunctional.

What I really like is how you build your entire existence around me, because you recognize both brilliance, and the fact that I am never wrong.

Enlightenment, my role.


Groveling, yours.

I do what you accuse others of not doing - proving you intellectually dysfunctional using irrefutable evidence.

Your denial of it is a bonus.

lol, maybe you sue me for definition of character, as they say...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Which part do you wish to do deny? I have you on record saying that the internment camps were justifiable and praiseworthy.

I have you on record saying the internment camps were just political ploy to get votes and had nothing to do with national security.

Those are BOTH your opinions, and they are irreconcilable. You do this all the time. You flip flop from one side of an issue to the other just so you can disagree with or take some cheap shot at some liberal.

You are intellectually dysfunctional. Stop being intellectually dysfunctional.

What I really like is how you build your entire existence around me, because you recognize both brilliance, and the fact that I am never wrong.

Enlightenment, my role.


Groveling, yours.

I do what you accuse others of not doing - proving you intellectually dysfunctional using irrefutable evidence.

Your denial of it is a bonus.

lol, maybe you sue me for definition of character, as they say...

Are you kidding!


Nothing I like better than you crawling behind, clutching at the hems of my garment....trying to bask in the reflected glow.

 

[Camp]

I found this interesting post by you from 2009, in a thread about torture, when you were defending torture:

"An unfortunate characteristic of our liberal brethren is the inability to see beyond the “feel good” self-pat-on-the-back attempt at moral superiority, a childlike “can’t we all just get along.”

Never is this flaw more evident than when we attempt to confront evil. Liberals, it seems, are unable to recognize evil, and therefore are psychologically unable to deal with it.
We see this in our left-leaning friends ability to identify with the victimizer, but not the victim. We see it in the consoling of the drug abusing, law breaking criminal, but detachment from the recipient of their criminality.

Our great leaders have all understood this, and each dealt with evil in ways outside of our Constitutional methods.

Abraham Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus in 1861 and 1862. The Peace Democrats, also called copperheads, publicly criticized Lincoln's belief that violating the U.S. Constitution was required to save it as a whole.

Franklin Roosevelt opened the mail, censored the press and built internment camps (Executive Order No. 9066 in December 1941.)

When the threat of evil had been emasculated, the infractions to our civility were removed, and we returned to the way of life that we exemplified. (See Ex-parte Milligan).

And those on the left, like yourself, returned to carping about how terrible our leaders were."

Everyone read the above carefully. PC is PRAISING Presidents for violating the Constitution...calling it greatness...

... but she's doing it of course when it better suited her agenda to endorse such actions.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1212130-post122.html

And to make this even better, while PC praises FDR above for the internment of the Japanese, as necessary to 'emasculate' a threat of evil, she says below, at another time, in another thread (where she has a different agenda) the following:

Japanese interment policy?

It was not based on national security....as you probably believe.
It was based on the wishes to accrue votes for the Democrats.

The internment of 110,000 Japanese seems to have been largely political. Earl Warren of California was sensitive to his constituents resenting the large success of the Japanese in agriculture. And, interned, they couldn’t vote against FDR, and he did pick up three House seats…and after the election he began to move for the release of the Japanese.
From "FDR Goes To War," by Folsom and Folsom

Wadda guy, your hero.

Hmmm....one day she praises it profusely, another day she reviles it with equal zeal.

I wonder if that is schizophrenia of some sort, or just a weak mind failing to keep track of one lie to the next?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/7684443-post94.html

It does't say any such thing...

Moron.

Deny, deny, deny, deflect, distract and deny some more. Name call and hurl insults to distract and deflect, declare victory even when doing so seems ridiculous. Just keep declaring victory. It works like the big lie method of continuous reinforcement of a fraudulent statement. It changes the debate and discussion from defense to offense and offers an escape from being held responsible for the lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And to make this even better, while PC praises FDR above for the internment of the Japanese, as necessary to 'emasculate' a threat of evil, she says below, at another time, in another thread (where she has a different agenda) the following:

Japanese interment policy?

It was not based on national security....as you probably believe.
It was based on the wishes to accrue votes for the Democrats.

The internment of 110,000 Japanese seems to have been largely political. Earl Warren of California was sensitive to his constituents resenting the large success of the Japanese in agriculture. And, interned, they couldn’t vote against FDR, and he did pick up three House seats…and after the election he began to move for the release of the Japanese.
From "FDR Goes To War," by Folsom and Folsom

Wadda guy, your hero.

Hmmm....one day she praises it profusely, another day she reviles it with equal zeal.

I wonder if that is schizophrenia of some sort, or just a weak mind failing to keep track of one lie to the next?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/7684443-post94.html

It does't say any such thing...

Moron.

Deny, deny, deny, deflect, distract and deny some more. Name call and hurl insults to distract and deflect, declare victory even when doing so seems ridiculous. Just keep declaring victory. It works like the big lie method of continuous reinforcement of a fraudulent statement. It changes the debate and discussion from defense to offense and offers an escape from being held responsible for the lie.

OMG! Another one!


What am I, a bug-light for freaks????


This one has a brain like a BB in a boxcar.

 

[Camp]

It does't say any such thing...

Moron.

Deny, deny, deny, deflect, distract and deny some more. Name call and hurl insults to distract and deflect, declare victory even when doing so seems ridiculous. Just keep declaring victory. It works like the big lie method of continuous reinforcement of a fraudulent statement. It changes the debate and discussion from defense to offense and offers an escape from being held responsible for the lie.

OMG! Another one!


What am I, a bug-light for freaks????


This one has a brain like a BB in a boxcar.

You're an internet bully pushing extreme political agenda's. That makes you a fun target. You dish the name calling and disparaging remarks out but whine like a little kid when anyone even politely critiques your viewpoints. If you can't take it quit shoveling it out.

 

[dilloduck]

Deny, deny, deny, deflect, distract and deny some more. Name call and hurl insults to distract and deflect, declare victory even when doing so seems ridiculous. Just keep declaring victory. It works like the big lie method of continuous reinforcement of a fraudulent statement. It changes the debate and discussion from defense to offense and offers an escape from being held responsible for the lie.

OMG! Another one!


What am I, a bug-light for freaks????


This one has a brain like a BB in a boxcar.

You're an internet bully pushing extreme political agenda's. That makes you a fun target. You dish the name calling and disparaging remarks out but whine like a little kid when anyone even politely critiques your viewpoints. If you can't take it quit shoveling it out.

Internet bully--- Think you can handle it bro or do you need Karate lessons ?

 

[Camp]

OMG! Another one!


What am I, a bug-light for freaks????


This one has a brain like a BB in a boxcar.

You're an internet bully pushing extreme political agenda's. That makes you a fun target. You dish the name calling and disparaging remarks out but whine like a little kid when anyone even politely critiques your viewpoints. If you can't take it quit shoveling it out.

Internet bully--- Think you can handle it bro or do you need Karate lessons ?

I like slapping bullies around. This one is easy. She is pure entertainment.