Before you speak to me about your religion

[DOTR]

Actions speak much louder than words.

The statement made in the OP, sounds as though it was written assuming that the religious person were Christian...

It certainly wasn't complaining about Muslim Jihadists or sympathizing with Hindu untouchables.

I am 57 years old. I have traveled and worked all over the US. I had one young woman try to tell me about Wicca. Other than her, I have never had anyone but Christians try and convince me of their faith. Not one.

Wicca isnt a faith. It is a chat room hobby. Mostly for teens and single mothers.

 

[WinterBorn]

Actions speak much louder than words.

The statement made in the OP, sounds as though it was written assuming that the religious person were Christian...

It certainly wasn't complaining about Muslim Jihadists or sympathizing with Hindu untouchables.

I am 57 years old. I have traveled and worked all over the US. I had one young woman try to tell me about Wicca. Other than her, I have never had anyone but Christians try and convince me of their faith. Not one.

So it *is* aimed at Christians.

It is aimed at anyone trying to tell me about their beliefs. It is aimed at anyone claiming their religion is the "one true religion".

But yes, in my experience, it fits many Christians who talk a good game but do little.

 

[WinterBorn]

Actions speak much louder than words.

The statement made in the OP, sounds as though it was written assuming that the religious person were Christian...

It certainly wasn't complaining about Muslim Jihadists or sympathizing with Hindu untouchables.

I am 57 years old. I have traveled and worked all over the US. I had one young woman try to tell me about Wicca. Other than her, I have never had anyone but Christians try and convince me of their faith. Not one.

Wicca isnt a faith. It is a chat room hobby. Mostly for teens and single mothers.

Wicca is a 20th century adaptation of an old pagan religion.

 

[danielpalos]

I am practicing tolerance with easy chics, and no longer give them a hard time for being easy.

 

[WinterBorn]

I am practicing tolerance with easy chics, and no longer give them a hard time for being easy.

You PRAY for easy chicks. Especially in a capitalistic, non-porn, way of friends not letting friends go without or missing their turn.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

As far as the OP goes, the Bible says the same thing.


1 John 3: 17-18
17 But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?

18 My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.


Or James 2:17
17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

My little children who were lucky enough to survive your mothers choice by not being aborted, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.

I would like to know where in the new testament where is says "Murder your children that you don't want from making a mistake while having sex". You lib ***** sure seem to have made that one up for your religious beliefs.

Tell you what, you show me a post where I voiced support for abortion, and I'll look for the passage you want. M'kay?

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Should I believe anything you say?

Nice research. The first quote is from May of 2012. The second is from November 2014.
Does that tell you I lied or that something changed?

It tells me you were a pretty shallow christian even when you claimed to be one. Probably posted platitudes on facebook or something.

LMAO!! Oh, so now you claim to know who I was over 5 years ago?

No, I was certainly not a shallow Christian. I was a devout one. I practiced what I preached. I studied. I served.

But you go ahead and tell me who I was back then. I'm sure that helps your beliefs.

No, I was certainly not a shallow Christian. I was a devout one. I practiced what I preached. I studied. I served.

Yet you voted for the very people who aborted babies. Damn that is mighty Christian of you.....

Did I? And who was it that I voted for that aborted babies?

 

[DOTR]

Actions speak much louder than words.

The statement made in the OP, sounds as though it was written assuming that the religious person were Christian...

It certainly wasn't complaining about Muslim Jihadists or sympathizing with Hindu untouchables.

I am 57 years old. I have traveled and worked all over the US. I had one young woman try to tell me about Wicca. Other than her, I have never had anyone but Christians try and convince me of their faith. Not one.

Wicca isnt a faith. It is a chat room hobby. Mostly for teens and single mothers.

Wicca is a 20th century adaptation of an old pagan religion.

No it is a 20th century invention from whole cloth. A hobby.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Actions speak much louder than words.

Obviously religion causes you distress...perhaps you should stop focusing on it and move to other topics

It causes me distress because you believers want to take some peoples human rights away and treat them like shit. YOu're what you're. Evil and hateful at heart.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Actions speak much louder than words.

Obviously religion causes you distress...perhaps you should stop focusing on it and move to other topics

It causes me distress because you believers want to take some peoples human rights away and treat them like shit. YOu're what you're. Evil and hateful at heart.

How can anyone take Gods given rights away from someone, other than a liberal killing a baby or child or person? Stealing from them? Having stuff isn't a God given right. Ruining another persons happiness, by taxing the shit out of them.? If the person is Christian, we have been persecuted many times before, and what Obama did was almost like the Romans. We took it for 8 years and then voted against 4 more years of his lying secretary.

 

[WinterBorn]

As far as the OP goes, the Bible says the same thing.


1 John 3: 17-18
17 But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?

18 My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.


Or James 2:17
17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

My little children who were lucky enough to survive your mothers choice by not being aborted, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.

I would like to know where in the new testament where is says "Murder your children that you don't want from making a mistake while having sex". You lib ***** sure seem to have made that one up for your religious beliefs.

Tell you what, you show me a post where I voiced support for abortion, and I'll look for the passage you want. M'kay?

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

Oh? And you think I am some leftwing radical? lol

Wouldn't it be simpler to discuss the actual topic?

No, I never cast a single vote for Obama, or any other democrat.

 

[WinterBorn]

The statement made in the OP, sounds as though it was written assuming that the religious person were Christian...

It certainly wasn't complaining about Muslim Jihadists or sympathizing with Hindu untouchables.

I am 57 years old. I have traveled and worked all over the US. I had one young woman try to tell me about Wicca. Other than her, I have never had anyone but Christians try and convince me of their faith. Not one.

Wicca isnt a faith. It is a chat room hobby. Mostly for teens and single mothers.

Wicca is a 20th century adaptation of an old pagan religion.

No it is a 20th century invention from whole cloth. A hobby.

You are welcome to your opinion. The fact of the matter is that Wicca is a recognized religion.

 

[WinterBorn]

As far as the OP goes, the Bible says the same thing.


1 John 3: 17-18
17 But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?

18 My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.


Or James 2:17
17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

My little children who were lucky enough to survive your mothers choice by not being aborted, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.

I would like to know where in the new testament where is says "Murder your children that you don't want from making a mistake while having sex". You lib ***** sure seem to have made that one up for your religious beliefs.

Tell you what, you show me a post where I voiced support for abortion, and I'll look for the passage you want. M'kay?

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

Singled out? Ok.
Polarized? No.
Attack? Kind of weak on that part.


But what is it that you actually disagree with from the OP?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

As far as the OP goes, the Bible says the same thing.


1 John 3: 17-18
17 But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?

18 My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.


Or James 2:17
17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

My little children who were lucky enough to survive your mothers choice by not being aborted, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.

I would like to know where in the new testament where is says "Murder your children that you don't want from making a mistake while having sex". You lib ***** sure seem to have made that one up for your religious beliefs.

Tell you what, you show me a post where I voiced support for abortion, and I'll look for the passage you want. M'kay?

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

Oh? And you think I am some leftwing radical? lol

Wouldn't it be simpler to discuss the actual topic?

No, I never cast a single vote for Obama, or any other democrat.

And you think I am some leftwing radical

I don't think you are, I know you are, any moron who voted for Obama twice and you are a ******* liar that you say you didn't, just proves how radical you are.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job

#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.

 

[WinterBorn]

As far as the OP goes, the Bible says the same thing.


1 John 3: 17-18
17 But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?

18 My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.


Or James 2:17
17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

My little children who were lucky enough to survive your mothers choice by not being aborted, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.

I would like to know where in the new testament where is says "Murder your children that you don't want from making a mistake while having sex". You lib ***** sure seem to have made that one up for your religious beliefs.

Tell you what, you show me a post where I voiced support for abortion, and I'll look for the passage you want. M'kay?

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

Oh? And you think I am some leftwing radical? lol

Wouldn't it be simpler to discuss the actual topic?

No, I never cast a single vote for Obama, or any other democrat.

And you think I am some leftwing radical

I don't think you are, I know you are, any moron who voted for Obama twice and you are a ******* liar that you say you didn't, just proves how radical you are.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job

#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.

You ignorant twit. You don't know jack-shit about who I voted for. And if you had been paying attention to posts on these forums you would have seen that my beliefs certainly do not fall in line with Obama. I have been consistent in my support of 2nd amendment rights, the US Constitution, serious tax reform, less gov't interference in our lives, the rights of the individual, capitalism over socialism, and more. But you, in your infinite wisdom, decide that I am a radical leftwinger. Why? Because I do not give someone a pass just because they spout the right words? And in doing so, you claim to know how I voted? Can you be any more absurd or petty?

Stick with the topic, junior. With any luck you won't look like a fool doing that. Because this line of bullshit makes you look like an idiot.

But, since you seem completely unable to discuss the actual topic, you resort to personal attacks and attempted insults.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I would like to know where in the new testament where is says "Murder your children that you don't want from making a mistake while having sex". You lib ***** sure seem to have made that one up for your religious beliefs.

Tell you what, you show me a post where I voiced support for abortion, and I'll look for the passage you want. M'kay?

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

Oh? And you think I am some leftwing radical? lol

Wouldn't it be simpler to discuss the actual topic?

No, I never cast a single vote for Obama, or any other democrat.

And you think I am some leftwing radical

I don't think you are, I know you are, any moron who voted for Obama twice and you are a ******* liar that you say you didn't, just proves how radical you are.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job

#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.

You ignorant twit. You don't know jack-shit about who I voted for. And if you had been paying attention to posts on these forums you would have seen that my beliefs certainly do not fall in line with Obama. I have been consistent in my support of 2nd amendment rights, the US Constitution, serious tax reform, less gov't interference in our lives, the rights of the individual, capitalism over socialism, and more. But you, in your infinite wisdom, decide that I am a radical leftwinger. Why? Because I do not give someone a pass just because they spout the right words? And in doing so, you claim to know how I voted? Can you be any more absurd or petty?

Stick with the topic, junior. With any luck you won't look like a fool doing that. Because this line of bullshit makes you look like an idiot.

But, since you seem completely unable to discuss the actual topic, you resort to personal attacks and attempted insults.

I do know, because of the way you speak. You can deny all you ******* want, but like Hillary, we see through those lies. When you get called out for your liberalism, then you are too ashamed to admit it. People like you are a weasel.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I would like to know where in the new testament where is says "Murder your children that you don't want from making a mistake while having sex". You lib ***** sure seem to have made that one up for your religious beliefs.

Tell you what, you show me a post where I voiced support for abortion, and I'll look for the passage you want. M'kay?

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

Oh? And you think I am some leftwing radical? lol

Wouldn't it be simpler to discuss the actual topic?

No, I never cast a single vote for Obama, or any other democrat.

And you think I am some leftwing radical

I don't think you are, I know you are, any moron who voted for Obama twice and you are a ******* liar that you say you didn't, just proves how radical you are.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job

#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.

You ignorant twit. You don't know jack-shit about who I voted for. And if you had been paying attention to posts on these forums you would have seen that my beliefs certainly do not fall in line with Obama. I have been consistent in my support of 2nd amendment rights, the US Constitution, serious tax reform, less gov't interference in our lives, the rights of the individual, capitalism over socialism, and more. But you, in your infinite wisdom, decide that I am a radical leftwinger. Why? Because I do not give someone a pass just because they spout the right words? And in doing so, you claim to know how I voted? Can you be any more absurd or petty?

Stick with the topic, junior. With any luck you won't look like a fool doing that. Because this line of bullshit makes you look like an idiot.

But, since you seem completely unable to discuss the actual topic, you resort to personal attacks and attempted insults.

But, since you seem completely unable to discuss the actual topic, you resort to personal attacks and attempted insults

Attack? Kind of weak on that part.

Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and 'frozen.'...

"...any target can always say, 'Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?' When your 'freeze the target,' you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments.... Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the 'others' come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target...'

 

[WinterBorn]

Tell you what, you show me a post where I voiced support for abortion, and I'll look for the passage you want. M'kay?

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

Oh? And you think I am some leftwing radical? lol

Wouldn't it be simpler to discuss the actual topic?

No, I never cast a single vote for Obama, or any other democrat.

And you think I am some leftwing radical

I don't think you are, I know you are, any moron who voted for Obama twice and you are a ******* liar that you say you didn't, just proves how radical you are.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job

#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.

You ignorant twit. You don't know jack-shit about who I voted for. And if you had been paying attention to posts on these forums you would have seen that my beliefs certainly do not fall in line with Obama. I have been consistent in my support of 2nd amendment rights, the US Constitution, serious tax reform, less gov't interference in our lives, the rights of the individual, capitalism over socialism, and more. But you, in your infinite wisdom, decide that I am a radical leftwinger. Why? Because I do not give someone a pass just because they spout the right words? And in doing so, you claim to know how I voted? Can you be any more absurd or petty?

Stick with the topic, junior. With any luck you won't look like a fool doing that. Because this line of bullshit makes you look like an idiot.

But, since you seem completely unable to discuss the actual topic, you resort to personal attacks and attempted insults.

I do know, because of the way you speak. You can deny all you ******* want, but like Hillary, we see through those lies. When you get called out for your liberalism, then you are too ashamed to admit it. People like you are a weasel.

Oh? And what, exactly, have I said that proves I voted for Obama? That I do not parrot the words of the religious right/social conservatives? That I believe in individual rights instead of some half-assed theocracy?

Your claims are laughable. You claim you know how I voted. Is lying part of your game plan?

 

[WinterBorn]

Tell you what, you show me a post where I voiced support for abortion, and I'll look for the passage you want. M'kay?

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

Oh? And you think I am some leftwing radical? lol

Wouldn't it be simpler to discuss the actual topic?

No, I never cast a single vote for Obama, or any other democrat.

And you think I am some leftwing radical

I don't think you are, I know you are, any moron who voted for Obama twice and you are a ******* liar that you say you didn't, just proves how radical you are.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job

#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.

You ignorant twit. You don't know jack-shit about who I voted for. And if you had been paying attention to posts on these forums you would have seen that my beliefs certainly do not fall in line with Obama. I have been consistent in my support of 2nd amendment rights, the US Constitution, serious tax reform, less gov't interference in our lives, the rights of the individual, capitalism over socialism, and more. But you, in your infinite wisdom, decide that I am a radical leftwinger. Why? Because I do not give someone a pass just because they spout the right words? And in doing so, you claim to know how I voted? Can you be any more absurd or petty?

Stick with the topic, junior. With any luck you won't look like a fool doing that. Because this line of bullshit makes you look like an idiot.

But, since you seem completely unable to discuss the actual topic, you resort to personal attacks and attempted insults.

But, since you seem completely unable to discuss the actual topic, you resort to personal attacks and attempted insults

Attack? Kind of weak on that part.

Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and 'frozen.'...

"...any target can always say, 'Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?' When your 'freeze the target,' you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments.... Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the 'others' come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target...'

Careful, sparky. Your own posts fit Saul's rules better than mine. You are the one sidetracking the discussion. You are the one making spurious claims. You are the one making personal attacks.

It is funny, you post the Rules for Radicals. But you have singled me out and attempted to "freeze" me. So, in fact, you have used tactics more suited to the radical left than I have. Did you vote for Obama both times? Or just once?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Did you vote for Obama? Yes or no?


Notice how I have used the Rules for Radicals #13 on WB, first you single out the target, then you polarize the target, then you attack the target.

Oh? And you think I am some leftwing radical? lol

Wouldn't it be simpler to discuss the actual topic?

No, I never cast a single vote for Obama, or any other democrat.

And you think I am some leftwing radical

I don't think you are, I know you are, any moron who voted for Obama twice and you are a ******* liar that you say you didn't, just proves how radical you are.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job

#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.

You ignorant twit. You don't know jack-shit about who I voted for. And if you had been paying attention to posts on these forums you would have seen that my beliefs certainly do not fall in line with Obama. I have been consistent in my support of 2nd amendment rights, the US Constitution, serious tax reform, less gov't interference in our lives, the rights of the individual, capitalism over socialism, and more. But you, in your infinite wisdom, decide that I am a radical leftwinger. Why? Because I do not give someone a pass just because they spout the right words? And in doing so, you claim to know how I voted? Can you be any more absurd or petty?

Stick with the topic, junior. With any luck you won't look like a fool doing that. Because this line of bullshit makes you look like an idiot.

But, since you seem completely unable to discuss the actual topic, you resort to personal attacks and attempted insults.

But, since you seem completely unable to discuss the actual topic, you resort to personal attacks and attempted insults

Attack? Kind of weak on that part.

Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and 'frozen.'...

"...any target can always say, 'Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?' When your 'freeze the target,' you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments.... Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the 'others' come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target...'

Careful, sparky. Your own posts fit Saul's rules better than mine. You are the one sidetracking the discussion. You are the one making spurious claims. You are the one making personal attacks.

It is funny, you post the Rules for Radicals. But you have singled me out and attempted to "freeze" me. So, in fact, you have used tactics more suited to the radical left than I have. Did you vote for Obama both times? Or just once?

Your own posts fit Saul's rules better than mine

I told the USMB that I was using the Rules against you and you just didn't understand it until about 2 posts ago. You libs hate it when the Rules end up being used against you, because of the thin skin you wear. I learned a while ago, that to go into battle with a lib, you play their game, get down in the gutter and bring the game equally as dirty.

As for voting for the 1/2 white moron who wanted to fundamentally transform America into a toilet, no I didn't vote for the brown turd. I knew as he was running, that he would make Jimmy Carter no longer the worst president ever in the history of the US. That Obamaturd, would attack the whites, and do nothing for the blacks, because typical of a liberal socialist, it is all about themselves, so while the RICH got much RICHER, the most citizens ended in poverty since the great depression.

Obamanomics also created record levels of poverty and government dependency in America. “Over the last 5 years, the number in poverty has increased by nearly 31%, to 49.7 million, with the poverty rate climbing over 30% to 16.1%,” Ferarra wrote.

Under Obamanomics, the Rich Get Richer While the Poor Get ...
www.progressivestoday.com/under-obamanomics-the-rich-get-richer-while-the-poor-get-poorer/