Be very careful.

I did post the word 'many', not ALL.

I do not trust doctors and I know there are many like me.
I did post the word 'many', not ALL.

Okay...Ummm....How does that have any bearing on my remark? My comment has to do with the doctors, not the "many people" who naively "think doctors are only looking out for their best interests."
many Americans firmly believe their doctors are only looking out for their best interests.
Well that's just flat out naive. I have my doubts about whether even all parents are so singularly altruistic toward their kids and whether all spouses are so singularly altruistic toward their partners. I know damn well doctors are not that altruistic toward their patients, monetary gain notwithstanding.
Are you saying, in refutation of my comment, that the many people who believe their doctors are only looking out for their best interests" are not "flat out naive" in so believing?

I believe MANY doctors are not to be trusted. That is clearly what I have posted.

That does not mean ALL doctors are untrustworthy. Get it?
I believe MANY doctors are not to be trusted. That is clearly what I have posted.

One need only expand the above series of quoted posts to see that what you originally wrote and what you've subsequently stated you believe are not the same things.
  • First you wrote about what "many people" believe about their doctors.
  • Now you've attested to what you believe, and assert that is what you initially wrote.
If you didn't mean what you initially wrote as it is written, that's fine; mistakes like that happen. But don't sit there and claim that what your errant phrasing means something other that what it says.
Good Lord, must you?

Many people DO believe their doctors are honest and forthright. Do you deny this?
I do not. Neither have I before denied they believe that.
WHATEVER!
 
Doctors are dangerous.
22886234_10212648912051356_8117882029627804579_n.jpg


I would add...Why do doctors prescribe so many synthetic prescription drugs, most of which cause more harm than healing? They are paid by Big Pharma
It was found that a vaccine is created out of the original strain of the virus. Once that virus enters into a host, it changes. As it spreads from 1 host to another, it continues to morph into a completely different virus. So by the time someone who has had an immunization shot, the prevention isn't really preventing anything, other than having big pharma preventing you from keeping your money. Tax dollars go to purchase flu shots that don't really prevent the flu.

Flu vaccines are highly ineffective and toxic
So you basically have a three out of 300 chance (one percent) of being vaccinated for the proper viral strain. Additionally, the viruses are always adapting and may change form by the time you are exposed.
 
Doctor Gosnell anyone?

You know Dr. Gosnell, right? I would assume everyone has heard of him since he became the leading mass murderer in US history.

For those who don't know cuz Hollywood refused to make a movie about him, presumably for the same reason they refused to rat out Harvey Weinstein for over 30 years, which is politics. Gosnell was an abortion doctor who murdered babies and women alike with impunity. The government said he violated numerous health care laws but instead of enforcing them decided just to let him be as he then proceeded to harm people for the next 30 years cuz abortion is such a political football and any impedance on abortion is a big no, no.

Incidentally he picked on the poor, which meant minority women. You would think that the NAACP would be all over that, eh?
 
I did post the word 'many', not ALL.

I do not trust doctors and I know there are many like me.
I did post the word 'many', not ALL.

Okay...Ummm....How does that have any bearing on my remark? My comment has to do with the doctors, not the "many people" who naively "think doctors are only looking out for their best interests."
many Americans firmly believe their doctors are only looking out for their best interests.
Well that's just flat out naive. I have my doubts about whether even all parents are so singularly altruistic toward their kids and whether all spouses are so singularly altruistic toward their partners. I know damn well doctors are not that altruistic toward their patients, monetary gain notwithstanding.
Are you saying, in refutation of my comment, that the many people who believe their doctors are only looking out for their best interests" are not "flat out naive" in so believing?

I believe MANY doctors are not to be trusted. That is clearly what I have posted.

That does not mean ALL doctors are untrustworthy. Get it?
I believe MANY doctors are not to be trusted. That is clearly what I have posted.

One need only expand the above series of quoted posts to see that what you originally wrote and what you've subsequently stated you believe are not the same things.
  • First you wrote about what "many people" believe about their doctors.
  • Now you've attested to what you believe, and assert that is what you initially wrote.
If you didn't mean what you initially wrote as it is written, that's fine; mistakes like that happen. But don't sit there and claim that what your errant phrasing means something other that what it says.
Good Lord, must you?

Many people DO believe their doctors are honest and forthright. Do you deny this?
I do not. Neither have I before denied they believe that.


Doctors, much like politicians are influenced by lobbyists and the doctors get bonuses for pushing unnecessary vaccines on children that use mercury based preservatives. Your pompous attitude doesn't impress me in the slightest. I had to fill a prescription for my son and the pharmacist tried to persuade me to get a flu shot and was downright aggressive telling me that I was putting others at risk before I gave him a proper beat down....and I did it in front of customers. Don't fuck with the bull because you will eventually get the horns. Big pharma rules and doctors push unnecessary shots.Fuck'em....I don't trust these quacks any further than I could toss their asses.
 
What better way of getting rid of your creditors than killing them?

In a debt slavery society like you describe, the elites be the creditors and we the debtors. So I think you mean the elites are trying to kill the debtors. But, that doesn't make sense either, why would you want to kill your debtor? You want them to live long lives, borrowing and paying you back.
 
Don't fuck with the bull because you will eventually get the horns

Oh, Rocko ... you're such a man ...

swooning.gif


Don't get immunized. In fact, don't use any medicine at all ... you're too tough to need them.
 
What better way of getting rid of your creditors than killing them?

In a debt slavery society like you describe, the elites be the creditors and we the debtors. So I think you mean the elites are trying to kill the debtors. But, that doesn't make sense either, why would you want to kill your debtor? You want them to live long lives, borrowing and paying you back.


Ummm, no...WE are the creditors and this all goes back to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of 1933 when all real money was confiscated and our sweat equity was pledged as surety against a debt we do not owe and instead of rights, we were granted privileges as de-facto employees of USA.INC in exchange for benefits that we paid for in advance.Our signature on Promissory notes that are then "monetized" creates what passes for money in this corrupt monetary system.
 
Chapter 11 bankruptcy of 1933

Yea ... I've heard that term before and I know who uses it. Good luck in your crusade against 'International Bankers' and 'You know who'.
 
Back
Top Bottom