Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe

[evenflow1969]

Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe​

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential...

www.foxnews.com

18 May 2020 ~~ By Brooke Singman
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential criminality” in the conduct of that probe is “focused on others.”
Barr, during a press conference otherwise focused on the December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, spoke at length about the Durham investigation. He said he has a “general idea” of how the investigation is going and confirmed that “some aspects are being investigated as potential crimes.”
Barr did say, however, that “not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.”
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
~~Snip~~
One source said that the "pattern of conduct" Durham is investigating includes misrepresentations made to the FISA court to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign associate Carter Page, as well as the "unmasking" of Flynn's identity.
“Barr talks to Durham every day,” one source recently told Fox News. “The president has been briefed that the case is being pursued, and it’s serious.”


Comment:
AS I've expressed before, I don't believe that Barack Hussein Obama aka, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham will be indicted for any crimes committed as president. However, many of his willing sycophants that participated in the seditious acts of the failed coup d' etat will be prosecuted.
This all hinges at this point as to whether Trump will be re-elected.
Doing so, could set a precedent that would be followed by every incoming Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat administration—investigate and indict their predecessors. I do, however, think that everybody else involved, no matter how far up or down the food chain, needs to swing for this.
There's no doubt that those that violated the oath to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights need to be prosecuted, the question still remains to whether or not they will be. People like Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Power, Rhodes, Comey, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, Strzok, and Page need to pay the piper....
One has to wonder if Barry signed off on "Get out of Jail Cards" for all of the above.
When the elites exempt other elites from the rule of law, they are perpetrating a silent tyranny on the rest of us.

The unmasking was not a crime and likely no prosecution for such unmasking is to come because if it was being investigated as a possible crime, the names released by the NSA would not have been done, on an ongoing investigation....

it politically served their purpose, but would have been a no no, if any of them were being investigated for it, in any kind of criminal manner.

It's a felony if you have no need to know....That's how security clearances work.

So tell us, in your infinitesimal wisdom, what does the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy need to know about Flynn talking to Russian political players?

Please, enlighten us all.

first, they were all authorized to request any unmasking..... it was not something that was decided on Flynn.

They received the intelligence briefs on Kislyak phone calls, they did not ask for them, they were ALL part of the admin that received such intelligence level briefings....

thus they were authorized to request any unmaskings, with reasons for such unmasking to understand the intelligence they were receiving. The NSA legal team, had to approve them or disapprove them, under the legal guidelines.

The Obama admin had 9200 unmasking requests by those authorized individuals in 2016....

The Trump admin in 2019 requested 22,000 unmaskings..... more than double the Obama year!

If you want to argue, that this seems like an invasion of any American's privacy, or that it is still too easy, even with the legal rules, to unmask so many people..... and this all needs to be reviewed and changed, I would agree with you!

Good job at ignoring the question.

Let me repeat; if you have no need to know, unmaking is a FELONY.....I can not, in my wildest dreams, imagine any scenario where the deputy director of the EPA or the ambassador to Italy had any such need to know....On that front alone, this is scandalous behavior.

What Trump's people have done is immaterial whataboutism.

So again tell us about the no need to know felony!LOL Hey yall its the no need to know felony we have all heard of this right? The no need to know felony. If you have no need to know it is a felony!!!1 LOL-LOL-LOL-LOL- I hope you are telling your freinds and niehgbors about the no need to know felony. We all need to know about the no need to0 know felony!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LOL

 

[Oddball]

Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe​

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential...

www.foxnews.com

18 May 2020 ~~ By Brooke Singman
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential criminality” in the conduct of that probe is “focused on others.”
Barr, during a press conference otherwise focused on the December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, spoke at length about the Durham investigation. He said he has a “general idea” of how the investigation is going and confirmed that “some aspects are being investigated as potential crimes.”
Barr did say, however, that “not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.”
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
~~Snip~~
One source said that the "pattern of conduct" Durham is investigating includes misrepresentations made to the FISA court to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign associate Carter Page, as well as the "unmasking" of Flynn's identity.
“Barr talks to Durham every day,” one source recently told Fox News. “The president has been briefed that the case is being pursued, and it’s serious.”


Comment:
AS I've expressed before, I don't believe that Barack Hussein Obama aka, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham will be indicted for any crimes committed as president. However, many of his willing sycophants that participated in the seditious acts of the failed coup d' etat will be prosecuted.
This all hinges at this point as to whether Trump will be re-elected.
Doing so, could set a precedent that would be followed by every incoming Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat administration—investigate and indict their predecessors. I do, however, think that everybody else involved, no matter how far up or down the food chain, needs to swing for this.
There's no doubt that those that violated the oath to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights need to be prosecuted, the question still remains to whether or not they will be. People like Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Power, Rhodes, Comey, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, Strzok, and Page need to pay the piper....
One has to wonder if Barry signed off on "Get out of Jail Cards" for all of the above.
When the elites exempt other elites from the rule of law, they are perpetrating a silent tyranny on the rest of us.

The unmasking was not a crime and likely no prosecution for such unmasking is to come because if it was being investigated as a possible crime, the names released by the NSA would not have been done, on an ongoing investigation....

it politically served their purpose, but would have been a no no, if any of them were being investigated for it, in any kind of criminal manner.

It's a felony if you have no need to know....That's how security clearances work.

So tell us, in your infinitesimal wisdom, what does the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy need to know about Flynn talking to Russian political players?

Please, enlighten us all.

so its the no need to know felony? LOL what is the section and code on that one? LOL

It's in the rules that come with having a security clearance...I was T-Sec in the Strategic Air Command, so I know.

What is your knowledge on the subject?

 

[Oddball]

Yeeeah....Just what I thought...You have no knowledge about security clearances and the rules governing them.

 

[evenflow1969]

Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe​

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential...

www.foxnews.com

18 May 2020 ~~ By Brooke Singman
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential criminality” in the conduct of that probe is “focused on others.”
Barr, during a press conference otherwise focused on the December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, spoke at length about the Durham investigation. He said he has a “general idea” of how the investigation is going and confirmed that “some aspects are being investigated as potential crimes.”
Barr did say, however, that “not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.”
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
~~Snip~~
One source said that the "pattern of conduct" Durham is investigating includes misrepresentations made to the FISA court to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign associate Carter Page, as well as the "unmasking" of Flynn's identity.
“Barr talks to Durham every day,” one source recently told Fox News. “The president has been briefed that the case is being pursued, and it’s serious.”


Comment:
AS I've expressed before, I don't believe that Barack Hussein Obama aka, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham will be indicted for any crimes committed as president. However, many of his willing sycophants that participated in the seditious acts of the failed coup d' etat will be prosecuted.
This all hinges at this point as to whether Trump will be re-elected.
Doing so, could set a precedent that would be followed by every incoming Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat administration—investigate and indict their predecessors. I do, however, think that everybody else involved, no matter how far up or down the food chain, needs to swing for this.
There's no doubt that those that violated the oath to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights need to be prosecuted, the question still remains to whether or not they will be. People like Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Power, Rhodes, Comey, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, Strzok, and Page need to pay the piper....
One has to wonder if Barry signed off on "Get out of Jail Cards" for all of the above.
When the elites exempt other elites from the rule of law, they are perpetrating a silent tyranny on the rest of us.

The unmasking was not a crime and likely no prosecution for such unmasking is to come because if it was being investigated as a possible crime, the names released by the NSA would not have been done, on an ongoing investigation....

it politically served their purpose, but would have been a no no, if any of them were being investigated for it, in any kind of criminal manner.

It's a felony if you have no need to know....That's how security clearances work.

So tell us, in your infinitesimal wisdom, what does the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy need to know about Flynn talking to Russian political players?

Please, enlighten us all.

so its the no need to know felony? LOL what is the section and code on that one? LOL

It's in the rules that come with having a security clearance...I was T-Sec in the Strategic Air Command, so I know.

What is your knowledge on the subject?

ya sure you do!LOL Its the no need to know felony. What is the section and code then buddy? For the no need to know felony? LOL-LOL-LOL

https://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml

Above is how to search for it buddie! Educate us on the no need to know felony!!!!!!!!!!LOL

 

[Oddball]

Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe​

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential...

www.foxnews.com

18 May 2020 ~~ By Brooke Singman
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential criminality” in the conduct of that probe is “focused on others.”
Barr, during a press conference otherwise focused on the December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, spoke at length about the Durham investigation. He said he has a “general idea” of how the investigation is going and confirmed that “some aspects are being investigated as potential crimes.”
Barr did say, however, that “not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.”
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
~~Snip~~
One source said that the "pattern of conduct" Durham is investigating includes misrepresentations made to the FISA court to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign associate Carter Page, as well as the "unmasking" of Flynn's identity.
“Barr talks to Durham every day,” one source recently told Fox News. “The president has been briefed that the case is being pursued, and it’s serious.”


Comment:
AS I've expressed before, I don't believe that Barack Hussein Obama aka, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham will be indicted for any crimes committed as president. However, many of his willing sycophants that participated in the seditious acts of the failed coup d' etat will be prosecuted.
This all hinges at this point as to whether Trump will be re-elected.
Doing so, could set a precedent that would be followed by every incoming Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat administration—investigate and indict their predecessors. I do, however, think that everybody else involved, no matter how far up or down the food chain, needs to swing for this.
There's no doubt that those that violated the oath to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights need to be prosecuted, the question still remains to whether or not they will be. People like Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Power, Rhodes, Comey, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, Strzok, and Page need to pay the piper....
One has to wonder if Barry signed off on "Get out of Jail Cards" for all of the above.
When the elites exempt other elites from the rule of law, they are perpetrating a silent tyranny on the rest of us.

The unmasking was not a crime and likely no prosecution for such unmasking is to come because if it was being investigated as a possible crime, the names released by the NSA would not have been done, on an ongoing investigation....

it politically served their purpose, but would have been a no no, if any of them were being investigated for it, in any kind of criminal manner.

It's a felony if you have no need to know....That's how security clearances work.

So tell us, in your infinitesimal wisdom, what does the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy need to know about Flynn talking to Russian political players?

Please, enlighten us all.

so its the no need to know felony? LOL what is the section and code on that one? LOL

It's in the rules that come with having a security clearance...I was T-Sec in the Strategic Air Command, so I know.

What is your knowledge on the subject?

ya sure you do!LOL Its the no need to know felony. What is the section and code then buddy? For the no need to know felony? LOL-LOL-LOL

https://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml

Above is how to search for it buddie! Educate us on the no need to know felony!!!!!!!!!!LOL

I'm not searching shit, punk...It was part of the very thorough briefing that everyone who had a security clearance got about them....Sharing privileged information with those without a need to know -even if they have an equal or higher clearance than you- is a felony, grounds for court martial, and a possible trip to Leavenworth.

So take you link and shove it up your unprepossessing ass.

 

[colfax_m]

Let me repeat; if you have no need to know, unmaking is a FELONY.....I can not, in my wildest dreams, imagine any scenario where the deputy director of the EPA or the ambassador to Italy had any such need to know....On that front alone, this is scandalous behavior.

No one has unilateral ability to unmask. The request is processed by the NSA who determine if the request is legitimate. The approval process does not care if you can’t imagine why it’s necessary. Your opinion doesn’t matter.

 

[evenflow1969]

Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe​

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential...

www.foxnews.com

18 May 2020 ~~ By Brooke Singman
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential criminality” in the conduct of that probe is “focused on others.”
Barr, during a press conference otherwise focused on the December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, spoke at length about the Durham investigation. He said he has a “general idea” of how the investigation is going and confirmed that “some aspects are being investigated as potential crimes.”
Barr did say, however, that “not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.”
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
~~Snip~~
One source said that the "pattern of conduct" Durham is investigating includes misrepresentations made to the FISA court to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign associate Carter Page, as well as the "unmasking" of Flynn's identity.
“Barr talks to Durham every day,” one source recently told Fox News. “The president has been briefed that the case is being pursued, and it’s serious.”


Comment:
AS I've expressed before, I don't believe that Barack Hussein Obama aka, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham will be indicted for any crimes committed as president. However, many of his willing sycophants that participated in the seditious acts of the failed coup d' etat will be prosecuted.
This all hinges at this point as to whether Trump will be re-elected.
Doing so, could set a precedent that would be followed by every incoming Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat administration—investigate and indict their predecessors. I do, however, think that everybody else involved, no matter how far up or down the food chain, needs to swing for this.
There's no doubt that those that violated the oath to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights need to be prosecuted, the question still remains to whether or not they will be. People like Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Power, Rhodes, Comey, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, Strzok, and Page need to pay the piper....
One has to wonder if Barry signed off on "Get out of Jail Cards" for all of the above.
When the elites exempt other elites from the rule of law, they are perpetrating a silent tyranny on the rest of us.

The unmasking was not a crime and likely no prosecution for such unmasking is to come because if it was being investigated as a possible crime, the names released by the NSA would not have been done, on an ongoing investigation....

it politically served their purpose, but would have been a no no, if any of them were being investigated for it, in any kind of criminal manner.

It's a felony if you have no need to know....That's how security clearances work.

So tell us, in your infinitesimal wisdom, what does the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy need to know about Flynn talking to Russian political players?

Please, enlighten us all.

so its the no need to know felony? LOL what is the section and code on that one? LOL

It's in the rules that come with having a security clearance...I was T-Sec in the Strategic Air Command, so I know.

What is your knowledge on the subject?

ya sure you do!LOL Its the no need to know felony. What is the section and code then buddy? For the no need to know felony? LOL-LOL-LOL

https://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml

Above is how to search for it buddie! Educate us on the no need to know felony!!!!!!!!!!LOL

I'm not searching shit, punk...It was part of the very thorough briefing that everyone who had a security clearance got about them....Sharing privileged information with those without a need to know -even if they have an equal or higher clearance than you- is a felony, grounds for court martial, and a possible trip to Leavenworth.

So take you link and shove it up your unprepossessing ass.

so much like your brain the section and code does not exist. Come on now you bright,bright guy, you have a chance to educate the poor uneducated masses about the no need to know felony! LOL-LOL-LOL-LOL-LOL_LOL It is such a terrible crime dont ya thiink we all deserve to know about it. Tell us about the no need to know felony!LOL_LOL_LOL

 

[Oddball]

Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe​

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential...

www.foxnews.com

18 May 2020 ~~ By Brooke Singman
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential criminality” in the conduct of that probe is “focused on others.”
Barr, during a press conference otherwise focused on the December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, spoke at length about the Durham investigation. He said he has a “general idea” of how the investigation is going and confirmed that “some aspects are being investigated as potential crimes.”
Barr did say, however, that “not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.”
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
~~Snip~~
One source said that the "pattern of conduct" Durham is investigating includes misrepresentations made to the FISA court to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign associate Carter Page, as well as the "unmasking" of Flynn's identity.
“Barr talks to Durham every day,” one source recently told Fox News. “The president has been briefed that the case is being pursued, and it’s serious.”


Comment:
AS I've expressed before, I don't believe that Barack Hussein Obama aka, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham will be indicted for any crimes committed as president. However, many of his willing sycophants that participated in the seditious acts of the failed coup d' etat will be prosecuted.
This all hinges at this point as to whether Trump will be re-elected.
Doing so, could set a precedent that would be followed by every incoming Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat administration—investigate and indict their predecessors. I do, however, think that everybody else involved, no matter how far up or down the food chain, needs to swing for this.
There's no doubt that those that violated the oath to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights need to be prosecuted, the question still remains to whether or not they will be. People like Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Power, Rhodes, Comey, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, Strzok, and Page need to pay the piper....
One has to wonder if Barry signed off on "Get out of Jail Cards" for all of the above.
When the elites exempt other elites from the rule of law, they are perpetrating a silent tyranny on the rest of us.

The unmasking was not a crime and likely no prosecution for such unmasking is to come because if it was being investigated as a possible crime, the names released by the NSA would not have been done, on an ongoing investigation....

it politically served their purpose, but would have been a no no, if any of them were being investigated for it, in any kind of criminal manner.

It's a felony if you have no need to know....That's how security clearances work.

So tell us, in your infinitesimal wisdom, what does the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy need to know about Flynn talking to Russian political players?

Please, enlighten us all.

so its the no need to know felony? LOL what is the section and code on that one? LOL

It's in the rules that come with having a security clearance...I was T-Sec in the Strategic Air Command, so I know.

What is your knowledge on the subject?

ya sure you do!LOL Its the no need to know felony. What is the section and code then buddy? For the no need to know felony? LOL-LOL-LOL

https://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml

Above is how to search for it buddie! Educate us on the no need to know felony!!!!!!!!!!LOL

I'm not searching shit, punk...It was part of the very thorough briefing that everyone who had a security clearance got about them....Sharing privileged information with those without a need to know -even if they have an equal or higher clearance than you- is a felony, grounds for court martial, and a possible trip to Leavenworth.

So take you link and shove it up your unprepossessing ass.

so much like your brain the section and code does not exist. Come on now you bright,bright guy, you have a chance to educate the poor uneducated masses about the no need to know felony! LOL-LOL-LOL-LOL-LOL_LOL It is such a terrible crime dont ya thiink we all deserve to know about it. Tell us about the no need to know felony!LOL_LOL_LOL

So my direct experience counts for nothing and you won't even bother yourself to look it up in the UCMJ.

Go fuck yourself.

 

[evenflow1969]

Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe​

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential...

www.foxnews.com

18 May 2020 ~~ By Brooke Singman
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential criminality” in the conduct of that probe is “focused on others.”
Barr, during a press conference otherwise focused on the December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, spoke at length about the Durham investigation. He said he has a “general idea” of how the investigation is going and confirmed that “some aspects are being investigated as potential crimes.”
Barr did say, however, that “not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.”
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
~~Snip~~
One source said that the "pattern of conduct" Durham is investigating includes misrepresentations made to the FISA court to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign associate Carter Page, as well as the "unmasking" of Flynn's identity.
“Barr talks to Durham every day,” one source recently told Fox News. “The president has been briefed that the case is being pursued, and it’s serious.”


Comment:
AS I've expressed before, I don't believe that Barack Hussein Obama aka, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham will be indicted for any crimes committed as president. However, many of his willing sycophants that participated in the seditious acts of the failed coup d' etat will be prosecuted.
This all hinges at this point as to whether Trump will be re-elected.
Doing so, could set a precedent that would be followed by every incoming Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat administration—investigate and indict their predecessors. I do, however, think that everybody else involved, no matter how far up or down the food chain, needs to swing for this.
There's no doubt that those that violated the oath to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights need to be prosecuted, the question still remains to whether or not they will be. People like Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Power, Rhodes, Comey, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, Strzok, and Page need to pay the piper....
One has to wonder if Barry signed off on "Get out of Jail Cards" for all of the above.
When the elites exempt other elites from the rule of law, they are perpetrating a silent tyranny on the rest of us.

The unmasking was not a crime and likely no prosecution for such unmasking is to come because if it was being investigated as a possible crime, the names released by the NSA would not have been done, on an ongoing investigation....

it politically served their purpose, but would have been a no no, if any of them were being investigated for it, in any kind of criminal manner.

It's a felony if you have no need to know....That's how security clearances work.

So tell us, in your infinitesimal wisdom, what does the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy need to know about Flynn talking to Russian political players?

Please, enlighten us all.

so its the no need to know felony? LOL what is the section and code on that one? LOL

It's in the rules that come with having a security clearance...I was T-Sec in the Strategic Air Command, so I know.

What is your knowledge on the subject?

ya sure you do!LOL Its the no need to know felony. What is the section and code then buddy? For the no need to know felony? LOL-LOL-LOL

https://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml

Above is how to search for it buddie! Educate us on the no need to know felony!!!!!!!!!!LOL

I'm not searching shit, punk...It was part of the very thorough briefing that everyone who had a security clearance got about them....Sharing privileged information with those without a need to know -even if they have an equal or higher clearance than you- is a felony, grounds for court martial, and a possible trip to Leavenworth.

So take you link and shove it up your unprepossessing ass.

so much like your brain the section and code does not exist. Come on now you bright,bright guy, you have a chance to educate the poor uneducated masses about the no need to know felony! LOL-LOL-LOL-LOL-LOL_LOL It is such a terrible crime dont ya thiink we all deserve to know about it. Tell us about the no need to know felony!LOL_LOL_LOL

So my direct experience counts for nothing and you won't even bother yourself to look it up in the UCMJ.

Go fuck yourself.

I am not the one saying the no need to know felony exists, you are and you want to spend tax payers money on the investigation of it , so it is up to you to educate the poorly educated public on the no need to know felony. Obvously you think it is important so pleazse educate us on the no need to know felony!!!!!LOl Oh, and please mkae sure those at your job and your neighbors are well educated on this I meen you want to investigae a former press based on it so we must need to know about it. We would all love to see the section and code on that one!LOL

 

[easyt65]

so its the no need to know felony? LOL what is the section and code on that one? LOL

As oddball pointed out, you obviously have never held a security clearance and have no knowledge / experience with them.

HAVING a security clearance does not give you immediate legal authority to access / have possession of classified information. Part of having that legal authority is having a 'LEGITIMATE NEED TO KNOW'.

Case in point: Just BEFORE Hillary Clinton stepped down as Secretary of State and left the State Department, she was debriefed and 'Read Out' of TOP SECRET SPECIAL COMPARTMENTALIZED INFORMATION (TS-SCI) programs, Part of that process is being briefed you no longer have legal access to any of that information you had access to - You can not have access to it, you can not have any of the information in your possession - you can't even DISCUSS it anymore.

A search of her private server revealed she had TS-SCI data on her unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured personal server.
- This is not a JOKE. It is not to be taken lightly. TS-SCI information is information so classified that if it were to be compromised it could do grave damage to national security. Hillary did not just violate a host of laws - she endangered national security. Handling of classified information and the rules and laws created to safeguard that information is not part of any political crap. It's serious and has serious consequences.

Whet the Obama administration did, or at least some within it, was to weaponize both United States Intelligence agencies and used classified information and ways to collect that information against POLITICAL enemies - not foreign/physical national security threats.

As OB stated, unless there is a valid, legitimate reason for the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy to have this classified information on Flynn at the very LEAST there was a massive abuse of power perpetrated, not to mention unmasking citizens in such a way is ILLEGAL.

 

[easyt65]

...it is up to you to educate the poorly educated public on the no need to know felony.

One must 1st WANT to be educated, and if someone truly wants to be educated they do not demand t be spoon-fed information that they themselves can not / will not make an effort to verify. Also, there are extremely too many examples DAILY of individuals demanding 'evidence' only to mock / refuse to acknowledge it when it is given. If 'the public' WANTED to truly know, the 'pubic' would make an effort to educate THEMSELVES, not just rely on others.

 

[Votto]

No investigation of Obamagate?

It's one of the perks of being with the Deep State.

Since 1965....

DEMOCRATS.........25 years in power
3 indictments
1 conviction
1 prison sentence
REPUBLICANS.......28 YEARS IN POWER
120 indictments
89 convictions
34 prison sentences

 

[evenflow1969]

so its the no need to know felony? LOL what is the section and code on that one? LOL

As oddball pointed out, you obviously have never held a security clearance and have no knowledge / experience with them.

HAVING a security clearance does not give you immediate legal authority to access / have possession of classified information. Part of having that legal authority is having a 'LEGITIMATE NEED TO KNOW'.

Case in point: Just BEFORE Hillary Clinton stepped down as Secretary of State and left the State Department, she was debriefed and 'Read Out' of TOP SECRET SPECIAL COMPARTMENTALIZED INFORMATION (TS-SCI) programs, Part of that process is being briefed you no longer have legal access to any of that information you had access to - You can not have access to it, you can not have any of the information in your possession - you can't even DISCUSS it anymore.

A search of her private server revealed she had TS-SCI data on her unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured personal server.
- This is not a JOKE. It is not to be taken lightly. TS-SCI information is information so classified that if it were to be compromised it could do grave damage to national security. Hillary did not just violate a host of laws - she endangered national security. Handling of classified information and the rules and laws created to safeguard that information is not part of any political crap. It's serious and has serious consequences.

Whet the Obama administration did, or at least some within it, was to weaponize both United States Intelligence agencies and used classified information and ways to collect that information against POLITICAL enemies - not foreign/physical national security threats.

As OB stated, unless there is a valid, legitimate reason for the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy to have this classified information on Flynn at the very LEAST there was a massive abuse of power perpetrated, not to mention unmasking citizens in such a way is ILLEGAL.

blah,blahblahblah you walk into a court room and you need section and code to place charges. Come up with section and code and I will listen till then you are full of shit. The no need to know felony what a laugh Put up or shut the fuck up.

 

[Care4all]

Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe​

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential...

www.foxnews.com

18 May 2020 ~~ By Brooke Singman
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential criminality” in the conduct of that probe is “focused on others.”
Barr, during a press conference otherwise focused on the December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, spoke at length about the Durham investigation. He said he has a “general idea” of how the investigation is going and confirmed that “some aspects are being investigated as potential crimes.”
Barr did say, however, that “not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.”
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
~~Snip~~
One source said that the "pattern of conduct" Durham is investigating includes misrepresentations made to the FISA court to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign associate Carter Page, as well as the "unmasking" of Flynn's identity.
“Barr talks to Durham every day,” one source recently told Fox News. “The president has been briefed that the case is being pursued, and it’s serious.”


Comment:
AS I've expressed before, I don't believe that Barack Hussein Obama aka, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham will be indicted for any crimes committed as president. However, many of his willing sycophants that participated in the seditious acts of the failed coup d' etat will be prosecuted.
This all hinges at this point as to whether Trump will be re-elected.
Doing so, could set a precedent that would be followed by every incoming Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat administration—investigate and indict their predecessors. I do, however, think that everybody else involved, no matter how far up or down the food chain, needs to swing for this.
There's no doubt that those that violated the oath to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights need to be prosecuted, the question still remains to whether or not they will be. People like Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Power, Rhodes, Comey, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, Strzok, and Page need to pay the piper....
One has to wonder if Barry signed off on "Get out of Jail Cards" for all of the above.
When the elites exempt other elites from the rule of law, they are perpetrating a silent tyranny on the rest of us.

The unmasking was not a crime and likely no prosecution for such unmasking is to come because if it was being investigated as a possible crime, the names released by the NSA would not have been done, on an ongoing investigation....

it politically served their purpose, but would have been a no no, if any of them were being investigated for it, in any kind of criminal manner.

It's a felony if you have no need to know....That's how security clearances work.

So tell us, in your infinitesimal wisdom, what does the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy need to know about Flynn talking to Russian political players?

Please, enlighten us all.

first, they were all authorized to request any unmasking..... it was not something that was decided on Flynn.

They received the intelligence briefs on Kislyak phone calls, they did not ask for them, they were ALL part of the admin that received such intelligence level briefings....

thus they were authorized to request any unmaskings, with reasons for such unmasking to understand the intelligence they were receiving. The NSA legal team, had to approve them or disapprove them, under the legal guidelines.

The Obama admin had 9200 unmasking requests by those authorized individuals in 2016....

The Trump admin in 2019 requested 22,000 unmaskings..... more than double the Obama year!

If you want to argue, that this seems like an invasion of any American's privacy, or that it is still too easy, even with the legal rules, to unmask so many people..... and this all needs to be reviewed and changed, I would agree with you!

Good job at ignoring the question.

Let me repeat; if you have no need to know, unmaking is a FELONY.....I can not, in my wildest dreams, imagine any scenario where the deputy director of the EPA or the ambassador to Italy had any such need to know....On that front alone, this is scandalous behavior.

What Trump's people have done is immaterial whataboutism.

If you have no need to know, in order to understand the intelligence, then the NSA reviewing your request for the release, won't authorize the unmasking request.

The person asking, is not the person who accepts or denies the request....

There is no felony, ever, for them asking.

The NSA, who authorized it, if done improperly and not within the rules could be in trouble....

 

[Care4all]

No investigation of Obamagate?

It's one of the perks of being with the Deep State.

Since 1965....

DEMOCRATS.........25 years in power
3 indictments
1 conviction
1 prison sentence
REPUBLICANS.......28 YEARS IN POWER
120 indictments
89 convictions
34 prison sentences

There is no Obamagate, it's all conjured up out of thin air, but you chose to believe the gobbledygook...!!!!!

Oh, nd just as we have been saying, most of the crooks, are republicans in office.... it's always been that way in my lifetime. Your list proves it!

 

[Oddball]

Barr Says He Doesn't Expect Criminal Investigation Of Obama or Biden As Result of Durham Probe​

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential...

www.foxnews.com

18 May 2020 ~~ By Brooke Singman
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday he does not expect U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review into the origins of the Russia probe will lead to a “criminal investigation” of either former President Barack Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden -- while noting that their concern of “potential criminality” in the conduct of that probe is “focused on others.”
Barr, during a press conference otherwise focused on the December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, spoke at length about the Durham investigation. He said he has a “general idea” of how the investigation is going and confirmed that “some aspects are being investigated as potential crimes.”
Barr did say, however, that “not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.”
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man,” Barr said. “Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
~~Snip~~
One source said that the "pattern of conduct" Durham is investigating includes misrepresentations made to the FISA court to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign associate Carter Page, as well as the "unmasking" of Flynn's identity.
“Barr talks to Durham every day,” one source recently told Fox News. “The president has been briefed that the case is being pursued, and it’s serious.”


Comment:
AS I've expressed before, I don't believe that Barack Hussein Obama aka, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham will be indicted for any crimes committed as president. However, many of his willing sycophants that participated in the seditious acts of the failed coup d' etat will be prosecuted.
This all hinges at this point as to whether Trump will be re-elected.
Doing so, could set a precedent that would be followed by every incoming Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat administration—investigate and indict their predecessors. I do, however, think that everybody else involved, no matter how far up or down the food chain, needs to swing for this.
There's no doubt that those that violated the oath to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights need to be prosecuted, the question still remains to whether or not they will be. People like Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Power, Rhodes, Comey, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, Strzok, and Page need to pay the piper....
One has to wonder if Barry signed off on "Get out of Jail Cards" for all of the above.
When the elites exempt other elites from the rule of law, they are perpetrating a silent tyranny on the rest of us.

The unmasking was not a crime and likely no prosecution for such unmasking is to come because if it was being investigated as a possible crime, the names released by the NSA would not have been done, on an ongoing investigation....

it politically served their purpose, but would have been a no no, if any of them were being investigated for it, in any kind of criminal manner.

It's a felony if you have no need to know....That's how security clearances work.

So tell us, in your infinitesimal wisdom, what does the deputy director of the EPA, the UN ambassador, or the ambassador to Italy need to know about Flynn talking to Russian political players?

Please, enlighten us all.

first, they were all authorized to request any unmasking..... it was not something that was decided on Flynn.

They received the intelligence briefs on Kislyak phone calls, they did not ask for them, they were ALL part of the admin that received such intelligence level briefings....

thus they were authorized to request any unmaskings, with reasons for such unmasking to understand the intelligence they were receiving. The NSA legal team, had to approve them or disapprove them, under the legal guidelines.

The Obama admin had 9200 unmasking requests by those authorized individuals in 2016....

The Trump admin in 2019 requested 22,000 unmaskings..... more than double the Obama year!

If you want to argue, that this seems like an invasion of any American's privacy, or that it is still too easy, even with the legal rules, to unmask so many people..... and this all needs to be reviewed and changed, I would agree with you!

Good job at ignoring the question.

Let me repeat; if you have no need to know, unmaking is a FELONY.....I can not, in my wildest dreams, imagine any scenario where the deputy director of the EPA or the ambassador to Italy had any such need to know....On that front alone, this is scandalous behavior.

What Trump's people have done is immaterial whataboutism.

If you have no need to know, in order to understand the intelligence, then the NSA reviewing your request for the release, won't authorize the unmasking request.

The person asking, is not the person who accepts or denies the request....

There is no felony, ever, for them asking.

The NSA, who authorized it, if done improperly and not within the rules could be in trouble....

There's never a penalty for asking....It's the revealing that is the criminal behavior.

If NSA actors revealed such info to those with no need to know, they're on the hook....But we're talking deep swamp here, and the accountability there is extremely rare.

But if A1C Joe Blow did the same thing, he'd be bunking at the stockade right now.

 

[Votto]

No investigation of Obamagate?

It's one of the perks of being with the Deep State.

Since 1965....

DEMOCRATS.........25 years in power
3 indictments
1 conviction
1 prison sentence
REPUBLICANS.......28 YEARS IN POWER
120 indictments
89 convictions
34 prison sentences

There is no Obamagate, it's all conjured up out of thin air, but you chose to believe the gobbledygook...!!!!!

Maybe Putin made them do it.

Or maybe nothing illegal ever goes on at the Federal level cuz they are all so righteous.

You be the judge.

LMAO!

 

[wamose]

I don't know what to think about this guy. I'd like to think he's going to do his job and prosecute all the lawbreakers but I need a few heads to show me he's actually doing what needs to be done. He's making it so people are starting to look at him like POS FBI director, Wray. This fucking shit has gone on too long without results. It's time for results or Trump should just clean house. All this jive bullshit doesn't mean anything without filling some jail cells.

 

[Billiejeens]

Obama, and Holder, did not know about fast and furious, until after that fact.... that was proven....

My goodness -
That one!

 

[Votto]

I don't know what to think about this guy. I'd like to think he's going to do his job and prosecute all the lawbreakers but I need a few heads to show me he's actually doing what needs to be done. He's making it so people are starting to look at him like POS FBI director, Wray. This fucking shit has gone on too long without results. It's time for results or Trump should just clean house. All this jive bullshit doesn't mean anything without filling some jail cells.

Don't be so hard on Barr. After all, look what they did to Flynn. They started to go after his family from what I hear. What would you do to protect the ones you love? Maybe Barr was faced with a similar situation.