Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome

JimH52

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
31,779
Reaction score
6,280
Points
1,170
Location
US
More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
Unlike the FBI, the D.O.J. is not an investigative agency. Barr is a lawyer. He doesn't know anything that hasn't been served on him.
The FBI is part of the DOJ. Barr had his agents look for voter fraud. They found none that would change the election results. They never will. But The Don is getting richer off of the lie,
 

justinacolmena

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
4,954
Reaction score
1,450
Points
140
Location
alaska, usa
The FBI is part of the DOJ.
DOJ attorneys are not FBI special agents.
When the FBI finds something worth going to court over, then they present it to the district attorneys.
The district attorney's job is to represent the criminal case against the defendant on behalf of the people to the best of his ability in court.
District attorneys do not, and cannot have any evidence to work with unless and until law enforcement officers or agents place it on their desk to prosecute in court.
 
OP
Skylar

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,630
Reaction score
6,956
Points
1,130
The FBI is part of the DOJ.
DOJ attorneys are not FBI special agents.
When the FBI finds something worth going to court over, then they present it to the district attorneys.
The district attorney's job is to represent the criminal case against the defendant on behalf of the people to the best of his ability in court.
District attorneys do not, and cannot have any evidence to work with unless and until law enforcement officers or agents place it on their desk to prosecute in court.
Again, for the cheap seats....

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”
 

donttread

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
126
Reaction score
61
Points
58
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
 
OP
Skylar

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,630
Reaction score
6,956
Points
1,130
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
Are you expecting Barr to answer you?
 

Indeependent

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
11,216
Points
2,030
Barr was correct, the DOJ and FBI, who have not been involved in investigating voter fraud, did not find evidence of enough voter fraud to change the result of the election.
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
56,716
Reaction score
15,125
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
Barr was correct, the DOJ and FBI, who have not been involved in investigating voter fraud, did not find evidence of enough voter fraud to change the result of the election.
The DOJ was involved in all states, Barr ordered them to be involved about a month ago.
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
56,716
Reaction score
15,125
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
None is acceptable, all fraud ...with evidence, that can be prosecuted, should be, by the State it occurred in.

Barr, is only involved at the federal level if there is widespread voter fraud where people conspired together, or across state lines, that was large enough, to affect the election results of the Biden win.

Nothing found, would affect the results of the Biden win....

Simple as that...
 

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
72,521
Reaction score
14,906
Points
2,180
Barr knows there is nothing in hell now that will stop Biden from becoming President...and his boss.

Also, anyone actually still holding their breath waiting for Durham's report can exhale now. The legitimate report will never see the light of day. IF one comes out it will say the same thing Barr just stated - 'Nothing to see here...move along.'

With none of the proven traitors being punished it is almost 100% certain that such treasonous coups...and stolen elections...will happen again. 'There is NOTHING / no repercussions to fear.'
:cul2:
 

donttread

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
126
Reaction score
61
Points
58
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
None is acceptable, all fraud ...with evidence, that can be prosecuted, should be, by the State it occurred in.

Barr, is only involved at the federal level if there is widespread voter fraud where people conspired together, or across state lines, that was large enough, to affect the election results of the Biden win.

Nothing found, would affect the results of the Biden win....

Simple as that...
Unless they fully investigate the Voting software that we know "randomly" switched votes in one county how would we ever know how widespread the fraud was or how much collusion was involved. the FBI made that determination in a week? LOL
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
71,961
Reaction score
13,191
Points
2,210
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
None is acceptable, all fraud ...with evidence, that can be prosecuted, should be, by the State it occurred in.

Barr, is only involved at the federal level if there is widespread voter fraud where people conspired together, or across state lines, that was large enough, to affect the election results of the Biden win.

Nothing found, would affect the results of the Biden win....

Simple as that...
Unless they fully investigate the Voting software that we know "randomly" switched votes in one county how would we ever know how widespread the fraud was or how much collusion was involved. the FBI made that determination in a week? LOL
What software randomly switched votes? In which state? Where's your proof?
 

BWK

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
15,430
Reaction score
3,255
Points
255
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
Doesn't matter. Republicans have abandoned their country and Democracy, while their racism needs to be fed, over the good of the country; Steve Schmidt: We are ‘one election away… from losing our democracy’
 

BWK

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
15,430
Reaction score
3,255
Points
255
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
None is acceptable, all fraud ...with evidence, that can be prosecuted, should be, by the State it occurred in.

Barr, is only involved at the federal level if there is widespread voter fraud where people conspired together, or across state lines, that was large enough, to affect the election results of the Biden win.

Nothing found, would affect the results of the Biden win....

Simple as that...
Unless they fully investigate the Voting software that we know "randomly" switched votes in one county how would we ever know how widespread the fraud was or how much collusion was involved. the FBI made that determination in a week? LOL
You are a liar, because you don't have any proof.
 

BWK

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
15,430
Reaction score
3,255
Points
255
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
None is acceptable, all fraud ...with evidence, that can be prosecuted, should be, by the State it occurred in.

Barr, is only involved at the federal level if there is widespread voter fraud where people conspired together, or across state lines, that was large enough, to affect the election results of the Biden win.

Nothing found, would affect the results of the Biden win....

Simple as that...
Unless they fully investigate the Voting software that we know "randomly" switched votes in one county how would we ever know how widespread the fraud was or how much collusion was involved. the FBI made that determination in a week? LOL
What software randomly switched votes? In which state? Where's your proof?
He's a liar who hit and runs from those lies.
 

BWK

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
15,430
Reaction score
3,255
Points
255
Barr knows there is nothing in hell now that will stop Biden from becoming President...and his boss.

Also, anyone actually still holding their breath waiting for Durham's report can exhale now. The legitimate report will never see the light of day. IF one comes out it will say the same thing Barr just stated - 'Nothing to see here...move along.'

With none of the proven traitors being punished it is almost 100% certain that such treasonous coups...and stolen elections...will happen again. 'There is NOTHING / no repercussions to fear.'
There is no legitimate report that you refer to you. You are a liar.
 

BWK

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
15,430
Reaction score
3,255
Points
255
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
Well, unless they somehow got to check the signatures... a worthless opinion.
Or....there's no evidence of widespread election fraud.

Occam's Razor, my friend.
He did not say that, he said he had no evidence that would change the outcome. Widespread fraud has already been established, people voting out of state and from residential addresses.

Which is not surprising... how would he if he could not look for it.
No widespread fraud has been found. You are a liar.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
71,961
Reaction score
13,191
Points
2,210
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
None is acceptable, all fraud ...with evidence, that can be prosecuted, should be, by the State it occurred in.

Barr, is only involved at the federal level if there is widespread voter fraud where people conspired together, or across state lines, that was large enough, to affect the election results of the Biden win.

Nothing found, would affect the results of the Biden win....

Simple as that...
Unless they fully investigate the Voting software that we know "randomly" switched votes in one county how would we ever know how widespread the fraud was or how much collusion was involved. the FBI made that determination in a week? LOL
What software randomly switched votes? In which state? Where's your proof?
He's a liar who hit and runs from those lies.
I see that.
 
OP
Skylar

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,630
Reaction score
6,956
Points
1,130
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
None is acceptable, all fraud ...with evidence, that can be prosecuted, should be, by the State it occurred in.

Barr, is only involved at the federal level if there is widespread voter fraud where people conspired together, or across state lines, that was large enough, to affect the election results of the Biden win.

Nothing found, would affect the results of the Biden win....

Simple as that...
Unless they fully investigate the Voting software that we know "randomly" switched votes in one county how would we ever know how widespread the fraud was or how much collusion was involved. the FBI made that determination in a week? LOL
Dude, the software 'switching votes' nonsense is double stupid.

First, there's no evidence of it. All the voting companies and their software were investigated, vetted and certified by our own Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council. They affirmed that this was the most secure election in US history with zero evidence of fraud or changed votes.

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history...
...There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."


Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees
So the claim of 'switched votes' is not only evidence free, its actively contradicted by our own election security experts. Which by any rational standard, would put this to bed.

But it gets worse. If the voting machines were changing votes, then the physical ballot (which has the vote right on it, which candidates the voter selected for the voter to review) would be wildly different from the electronic tallies.

Georgia did a hand recount of the physical ballots. The hand count of the physical ballots matched the electronic tallies with way more than 99% accuracy.

Utterly disproving the 'changed vote' conspiracy. A conspiracy for which no evidence exists in the first place.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BWK

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
71,961
Reaction score
13,191
Points
2,210
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
His answer doesn't say there was no election fraud...it says they haven't come up with a number or voter fraud sufficient enough to overturn the election...but when the legislators of these states reject certification due to possible fraudulent activity in blue districts Barr will have to investigate that....
You laughing libtards had better pay attention to what is happening in the states.....this whole thing may be undone if the state legislatures can't sign off on their own elections.....
So my question to "all talk Barr" is this. Just how much election fraud is acceptible?"
None is acceptable, all fraud ...with evidence, that can be prosecuted, should be, by the State it occurred in.

Barr, is only involved at the federal level if there is widespread voter fraud where people conspired together, or across state lines, that was large enough, to affect the election results of the Biden win.

Nothing found, would affect the results of the Biden win....

Simple as that...
Unless they fully investigate the Voting software that we know "randomly" switched votes in one county how would we ever know how widespread the fraud was or how much collusion was involved. the FBI made that determination in a week? LOL
Dude, the software 'switching votes' nonsense is double stupid.

First, there's no evidence of it. All the voting companies and their software were investigated, vetted and certified by our own Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council. They affirmed that this was the most secure election in US history with zero evidence of fraud or changed votes.

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history...
...There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."


Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees
So the claim of 'switched votes' is not only evidence free, its actively contradicted by our own election security experts. Which by any rational standard, would put this to bed.

But it gets worse. If the voting machines were changing votes, then the physical ballot (which has the vote right on it, which candidates the voter selected for the voter to review) would be wildly different from the electronic tallies.

Georgia did a hand recount of the physical ballots. The hand count of the physical ballots matched the electronic tallies with way more than 99% accuracy.

Utterly disproving the 'changed vote' conspiracy. A conspiracy for which no evidence exists in the first place.
I have never seen such mass delusion since Guyana
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top