If what Barney Frank says is true, that what you inherit isn't worked for thus should be taxed at 55%, what does that say about what the government gets in taxes from us?
The government didn't work for it. Why do they feel they have a right to all of that money? This assumes that what we didn't actually work for automatically belongs to the government.
This is why Barney Frank's argument is wrong. You shouldn't be taxed higher just because, in his opinion, you didn't work for it. As long as it's legal it doesn't matter how you got it. What right does he have to decide the level of taxation according to how it was obtained?
Watch the video:
Barney Frank and his hypocrisy
The number one goal of Marxism is the removal of private property. The ownership of all property by the government.
I think we're seeing this in Barney Frank.
The government didn't work for it. Why do they feel they have a right to all of that money? This assumes that what we didn't actually work for automatically belongs to the government.
This is why Barney Frank's argument is wrong. You shouldn't be taxed higher just because, in his opinion, you didn't work for it. As long as it's legal it doesn't matter how you got it. What right does he have to decide the level of taxation according to how it was obtained?
Watch the video:
Barney Frank and his hypocrisy
The number one goal of Marxism is the removal of private property. The ownership of all property by the government.
I think we're seeing this in Barney Frank.
Last edited: