Barack Obama's half brother Malik Obama poses a question:

[JGalt]

He sounds pretty based for an Obama.

"Put 3 groups of people on separate islands and give them all they need to survive. Gay men, gay women, and straight people. Go back in 100 years. Which group survived?"

 

[BrokeLoser]

He sounds pretty based for an Obama.

"Put 3 groups of people on separate islands and give them all they need to survive. Gay men, gay women, and straight people. Go back in 100 years. Which group survived?"

My old man always said….”Son, if you can’t support the idea of all people becoming faggots than you shouldn’t be supportive of one person being a faggot.”

 

[Slade3200]

My old man always said….”Son, if you can’t support the idea of all people becoming faggots than you shouldn’t be supportive of one person being a faggot.”

No offense to your pops but that’s a pretty idiotic statement

 

[JGalt]

My old man always said….”Son, if you can’t support the idea of all people becoming faggots than you shouldn’t be supportive of one person being a faggot.”

 

[Slade3200]

View attachment 731385

Really?! You agree with that shit?!

 

[BrokeLoser]

Really?! You agree with that shit?!

All legitimately principled people would have to.

 

[Slade3200]

All legitimately principled people would have to.

Not really. For example. From your statement Let’s substitute the word “faggot” with “celibate priest”.

See where that goes?

 

[ESay]

He sounds pretty based for an Obama.

"Put 3 groups of people on separate islands and give them all they need to survive. Gay men, gay women, and straight people. Go back in 100 years. Which group survived?"

Yes, and? There are people who don't have children because of 'childfree' principles, can't have because of some physical aspect and so on.

What this silly remark in the OP means? Maybe you should elaborate your thoughts.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Yes, and? There are people who don't have children because of 'childfree' principles, can't have because of some physical aspect and so on.

What this silly remark in the OP means? Maybe you should elaborate your thoughts.

WHOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

 

[ESay]

WHOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

It seems you aren't good in expressing your thought by words. Maybe try pictures?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

It seems you aren't good in expressing your thought by words. Maybe try pictures?

Wow! I'm impressed by how smart you thought you sounded saying that. Way to go!


.

 

[ESay]

Wow! I'm impressed by how smart you thought you sounded saying that. Way to go!


.

And I am impressed by your progress. So, maybe now some meaningful addressing of my previous post?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

And I am impressed by your progress. So, maybe now some meaningful addressing of my previous post?

I'd rather just go on being entertained by you trying to troll me.


.

 

[ESay]

I'd rather just go on being entertained by you trying to troll me.


.

Troll you? I want to remind it was your highly meaningful post at first.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Troll you? I want to remind it was your highly meaningful post at first.

OK. You win.


.

 

[JGalt]

Yes, and? There are people who don't have children because of 'childfree' principles, can't have because of some physical aspect and so on.

What this silly remark in the OP means? Maybe you should elaborate your thoughts.

Of course there are people who have "child-free" principles and physical disabilities. But they comprise a very small percentage of the total heterosexual child-bearing population. And in spite of those people who have "child-free" principles and physical disabilities, mankind has thrived and multiplied. That would not occur, given a majority of individuals who do not procreate in a normal fashion, such as gays and lesbians.

Do I need to draw you a picture with crayons or something?

 

[surada]

He sounds pretty based for an Obama.

"Put 3 groups of people on separate islands and give them all they need to survive. Gay men, gay women, and straight people. Go back in 100 years. Which group survived?"

What is based?

 

[JGalt]

What is based?

Based is "red-pilled." It's the opposite of "woke", which in reality is not "woke" at all.

Those in a state of "wokeness" are merely sheep, bleating the same leftist party lines. They're participants in a "human centipede."

For example: Blacks people like Ye are "based" or "red-pilled." They've seen through the facade of lies created by the left, that all Blacks are "victims" and should vote for Democrats to provide them with everything they need from cradle to grave. They've "broken away from the Plantation", so to speak.

Hispanic-Americans are "based" when they realize that illegal immigration actually hurts them, and they vote Republican.

 

[surada]

Based is "red-pilled." It's the opposite of "woke", which in reality is not "woke" at all.

Those in a state of "wokeness" are merely sheep, bleating the same leftist party lines. They're participants in a "human centipede."

For example: Blacks people like Ye are "based" or "red-pilled." They've seen through the facade of lies created by the left, that all Blacks are "victims" and should vote for Democrats to provide them with everything they need from cradle to grave. They've "broken away from the Plantation", so to speak.

Hispanic-Americans are "based" when they realize that illegal immigration actually hurts them, and they vote Republican.

I still don't know what woke is so I'm stumped by red pilled.

What Is Christian Nationalism? - Christianity Today

An explainer on how the belief differs from other forms of nationalism, patriotism, and Christianity.

www.christianitytoday.com

 

[JGalt]

I still don't know what woke is so I'm stumped by red pilled.

What Is Christian Nationalism? - Christianity Today

An explainer on how the belief differs from other forms of nationalism, patriotism, and Christianity.

www.christianitytoday.com

Urban Dictionary: based