DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 16,903
- 24,844
- 2,288
- Thread starter
- #81
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why didn't Trump?Why didn't the Biden admin expose Trump then?![]()
Psst....
"9-11.150 - Subpoenaing Targets of the Investigation
A grand jury may properly subpoena a subject or a target of the investigation and question the target about his or her involvement in the crime under investigation. See United States v. Wong, 431 U.S. 174, 179 n. 8 (1977); United States v. Washington, 431 U.S. 181, 190 n. 6 (1977); United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564, 573-75 and 584 n. 9 (1976); United States v. Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1, 10 n. 8 (1973). However, in the context of particular cases such a subpoena may carry the appearance of unfairness. Because the potential for misunderstanding is great, before a known "target" (as defined in JM 9-11.151) is subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury about his or her involvement in the crime under investigation, an effort should be made to secure the target's voluntary appearance. If a voluntary appearance cannot be obtained, the target should be subpoenaed only after the United States Attorney or the responsible Assistant Attorney General have approved the subpoena. In determining whether to approve a subpoena for a "target," careful attention will be paid to the following considerations:
The importance to the successful conduct of the grand jury's investigation of the testimony or other information sought;
Whether the substance of the testimony or other information sought could be provided by other witnesses; and
Whether the questions the prosecutor and the grand jurors intend to ask or the other information sought would be protected by a valid claim of privilege.
[cited in JM 9-11.153] [updated April 2018]"
![]()
9-11.000 - Grand Jury
www.justice.gov
Any day now...
HahahaObysmal is not going to jail, but the Demoquacks are going to feel the pain.
And under the 5th Amendment the accoused can tell them to piss off.
WW
Hahaha
And then they play video of Trump tongue bathing Putin.
And then they trot out the bipartisan Intelligence committee's report.
And that will be that.
Oh, apparently Newsmax didn't show you any of that.Fort..................you don't even make sense.
I really liked the part where Putin and Trump shared a lie, while Trump was running for president and after he was elected, about Trump tower Moscow.All things Russian have been and will continue to be a felonious hoax.
Because there is no there.Why didn't Trump?
"Barack Obama responds to Donald Trump's Russia "treason" threats
Former President Barack Obama's office has released a statement after President Donald Trump has accused the Democrat and members of his administration of committing "treason" over alleged manufacturing of intelligence regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Obama's office said in a statement, "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction."
Save it for the federal grand jury, Barack. They will have a lot of questions under oath for you.
"Barack Obama responds to Donald Trump's Russia "treason" threats
Former President Barack Obama's office has released a statement after President Donald Trump has accused the Democrat and members of his administration of committing "treason" over alleged manufacturing of intelligence regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Obama's office said in a statement, "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction."
Save it for the federal grand jury, Barack. They will have a lot of questions under oath for you.
Sounds like Obama may need a few more gay friends.
Well, responding is likely not a good idea, given his 5th amendment right, but talking about something completely off topic, is not a bad idea. Deflection isn’t a bad defense
I am sure you have proof, let’s see it.Obama is right. All Trump is doing is attempting to distract from his pedo friendship with Epstein.
Big Mike may have already done some of that.He may try the "transitioning" gambit to get into a women's prison.
He could, if invited.Psst - the accused doesn't testify before a Grand Jury. Hell the defense isn't even present.