And for the record I started playing video games when they were created and still do. From pong to Far Cry 3
No urges to kill as of yet. And keep in mind I started playing 30 years ago.
So why ban guns so that just a FEW that can't control themselves like this shooter still can use knives?
My point is banning the inanimate object is not the solution.
Behavior modification of the FEW is what has occurred and this behavior WAS done because of the influence of video games!
I was being facetious regarding "banning" video games but MY point is when I was getting my degree in psychology, we did behavior modification of cats and found pleasure zones in the brain that stimulated cats.
Same thing happens to YOUR brain starting with pong, Mario,etc... it modified your behavior Gramps because you were able to displace some anger by bopping the mole! It's called displacement. MOST people like you gramps don't have a problem... it is the shooters that do BUT to ban GUNS because of a few??
Again knee jerk reactions. Hyperbole. Hysteria. Stupid behavior on the part of the media!
I read an article from NYT today and 10 times we were told Ms. Lanza was a "big gun fan"! 10 times in that one article. Think there was a bias there?
Ms. Lanza, mother of Conn. school gunman, was "big, big gun fan
she was "a big, big gun fan"
gun apparently drawn from her own collection,
she liked to talk about her gun collection.
"She had several different guns," he said. "I don't know how many. She would go target shooting with her kids."
She was "a big, big gun fan," he added on his website.
Nancy Lanza, mother of Conn. school gunman, was "big, big gun fan" - The Denver Post
This MSM biased obsession with GUN Control as evidenced by just this ONE article's repetition of "gun fan"..etc. why was that necessary?
All it does is FAN hysteria, hyperbole, and totally uncalled for idiocy!