You realize those women are the CUSTOMERS....not the service providers, right?
Yes, but immaterial. Do women have the right to decide who they want to examine them or don't they? Would it be proper for government to force women to be attended to by male gynecologists in order to SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION?
Do these women have a right to free association or not?
I'm sorry...but it is TOTALLY material......customers can pick and choose their service providers at will. It's pretty interesting that I have to even tell you that.
Why can't employers pick and choose their employees? Why can't businesses pick and choose their customers? Your answer? It's against the law.
Well you know what, it was also against the law for blacks to vote and for women to vote. Why should women get the vote? They shouldn't, it's against the law for women to vote. Well, that's easy to solve, just change the law.
All you're doing is employing the Appeal to Law fallacy. This fallacy has no place in discussions focused on principles.
Your position, I assume, is that discrimination is wrong. Well, these women are discriminating. There's no doubt about that. So, what are you prepared to do to stop these women from sexually discriminating against male gynecologists?
If your answer is that these women have the right to free association, the right to pick and choose who they want in their life, that no law can supersede their human rights to make their own friends, pick their own physician, etc then you have to address the issue of human rights applying to one group of people and being denied to another group of people.
The law that you point to is morally and philosophically wrong. It privileges an orderly marketplace over the human rights of humans. Forced association with people you don't want to associate with is one form of totalitarian control over individual dignity.
If you believe that a woman being forced to be seen by a male gynecologist when her preference is to be seen by a female gynecologist is a direct attack on the woman's right to free association, then how do you imagine that the same form of indignity isn't being felt by people who provide services?
To defend totalitarianism by saying "It's the law" is ludicrous.