Bachmann signs The Family Lead pledge

I don't care one way or the other..if homosexuals want to be miserable in marriage like the other 50% of the population, let them..

but MARRIAGE still isn't a RIGHT. but then it involve getting the Guberment involved, yet they then tell us to stay out of their bedrooms and uterus...

can't have it both ways
 
I don't care one way or the other..if homosexuals want to be miserable in marriage like the other 50% of the population, let them..

but MARRIAGE still isn't a RIGHT. but then it involve getting the Guberment involved, yet they then tell us to stay out of their bedrooms and uterus...

can't have it both ways

It's true it's not a right. otherwise, you wouldn't need a license. but why does the government discriminate?
 
thats not what I asked and remarked upon based on the quote I answered NK..... The what means little in the remark I made- its the why, why democratic social issue pursuance is ok, but the reps get beat up for doing same?
DADT was a compromise. The Social Conservatives would not stand for President Clinton relieving the military of bigotry all at once. The Dream Act would have permitted immigrant children (brought here by their parents and grew up essentially as Americans) to pursue a college degree and apply for citizenship. But, the Social Conservatives would rather squander the resource of educated Americans if only to bolster their own bigotry and xenophobia. DOMA was not a Liberal initiative was it?

So, we see Conservatives blocking civil rights, social advancement and the concept of e pluribis unum at every turn.

that sir, is not what I asked you, I am well aware of the content of the issues;

I asked why; is it ok for dems to purse their social issues and reps get hammered for pursing theirs?
Because the Conservative Social issues deny rights, divide the country along bigotted lines and promote the erosion of personal freedoms.

It looks as if Conservatives want smaller government when it comes to feeding children, housing the poor and caring for the destitute. But they want bigger, more intrusive government when it comes to personal freedom and bedrooms.

I guess cash trumps freedom in a Conservative mindset.
 
thats not what I asked and remarked upon based on the quote I answered NK..... The what means little in the remark I made- its the why, why democratic social issue pursuance is ok, but the reps get beat up for doing same?
DADT was a compromise. The Social Conservatives would not stand for President Clinton relieving the military of bigotry all at once. The Dream Act would have permitted immigrant children (brought here by their parents and grew up essentially as Americans) to pursue a college degree and apply for citizenship. But, the Social Conservatives would rather squander the resource of educated Americans if only to bolster their own bigotry and xenophobia. DOMA was not a Liberal initiative was it?

So, we see Conservatives blocking civil rights, social advancement and the concept of e pluribis unum at every turn.

that sir, is not what I asked you, I am well aware of the content of the issues;

I asked why; is it ok for dems to purse their social issues and reps get hammered for pursing theirs?

Are you claiming that conservatives don't "hammer" Dems on their social issues?
 
DADT was a compromise. The Social Conservatives would not stand for President Clinton relieving the military of bigotry all at once. The Dream Act would have permitted immigrant children (brought here by their parents and grew up essentially as Americans) to pursue a college degree and apply for citizenship. But, the Social Conservatives would rather squander the resource of educated Americans if only to bolster their own bigotry and xenophobia. DOMA was not a Liberal initiative was it?

So, we see Conservatives blocking civil rights, social advancement and the concept of e pluribis unum at every turn.

that sir, is not what I asked you, I am well aware of the content of the issues;

I asked why; is it ok for dems to purse their social issues and reps get hammered for pursing theirs?
Because the Conservative Social issues deny rights, divide the country along bigotted lines and promote the erosion of personal freedoms.

It looks as if Conservatives want smaller government when it comes to feeding children, housing the poor and caring for the destitute. But they want bigger, more intrusive government when it comes to personal freedom and bedrooms.

I guess cash trumps freedom in a Conservative mindset.

you are caught up in making values judgments, then, your answer is tantamount to telling anyone that doesn't feel same- to shut up. you realize that....right?
 
I don't care one way or the other..if homosexuals want to be miserable in marriage like the other 50% of the population, let them..

but MARRIAGE still isn't a RIGHT. but then it involve getting the Guberment involved, yet they then tell us to stay out of their bedrooms and uterus...

can't have it both ways

It's true it's not a right. otherwise, you wouldn't need a license. but why does the government discriminate?

Can't answer that one, but this proposition has been put before the people of states to vote on and they have voted against it mostly..they have their reasons I guess.
 
DADT was a compromise. The Social Conservatives would not stand for President Clinton relieving the military of bigotry all at once. The Dream Act would have permitted immigrant children (brought here by their parents and grew up essentially as Americans) to pursue a college degree and apply for citizenship. But, the Social Conservatives would rather squander the resource of educated Americans if only to bolster their own bigotry and xenophobia. DOMA was not a Liberal initiative was it?

So, we see Conservatives blocking civil rights, social advancement and the concept of e pluribis unum at every turn.

that sir, is not what I asked you, I am well aware of the content of the issues;

I asked why; is it ok for dems to purse their social issues and reps get hammered for pursing theirs?

Are you claiming that conservatives don't "hammer" Dems on their social issues?

*sigh* did you read the exchanges going back to the point of origin re: my question to Nosmo King?
 
where does it state MARRIAGE IS A RIGHT?
talk about WEDGE ISSUES, you Liberals are famous for using them.

So, 2 people of the same gender who live together for over 7 years (requirement for common law marriage) shouldn't be able to enjoy the same tax rights as those who are of opposite genders?

They shouldn't be able to visit loved ones in the hospital?

THey should.
And for the life of me I dont understand why my conservative friends dont argue for it as I do...
As a conservative, I believe anyone has the right to do whatever they want with their lives...it is none of my business....and I will always support gay marriage.
And no...I am not gay. A married heterosexual man.

You know...........I met my first gay person on my first ship in the Navy. He and I had been friends for a while when he told me. I asked him why he told me and he said it just made it easier to be able to be himself once in a while around people he trusted.

Over the next 20 years, I met quite a few more. Interestingly enough, they were more detail oriented and did their jobs better than their straight counterparts. How do I know? Simple, I was a PN and had to prepare exam worksheets for the command every cycle, which meant I had to tally their personal awards, evaluation averages as well as figure out their time in service and length of service.

Me personally? I think they should have the same rights to serve, as well as have the same legal rights that heterosexual couples do.

And yeah........I'm also very much a hetero male.
 
I am not a fan of pornography and am heterosexual as they come. My life has been complete in being faithful to each of my wives; I did not know a woman between the death of the first and my marriage to my second. I rarely drink, I don't smoke, and I don't toke. Having said all this, I also believe that small government cannot regulate such behaviors without becoming massive, intrusive big government in the lives of everyday Americans.

MB is wrong if she thinks that 'small government' can do these things without becoming Big Brother intrusive government. She is a Righty Extremist Religious Fascist that wants to marry her fundamentalist views to government. I oppose such nonsense.
 
that sir, is not what I asked you, I am well aware of the content of the issues;

I asked why; is it ok for dems to purse their social issues and reps get hammered for pursing theirs?
Because the Conservative Social issues deny rights, divide the country along bigotted lines and promote the erosion of personal freedoms.

It looks as if Conservatives want smaller government when it comes to feeding children, housing the poor and caring for the destitute. But they want bigger, more intrusive government when it comes to personal freedom and bedrooms.

I guess cash trumps freedom in a Conservative mindset.

you are caught up in making values judgments, then, your answer is tantamount to telling anyone that doesn't feel same- to shut up. you realize that....right?

What does your side do? Scream your judgments... lobby for legislation to ban things you don't like? Kill an abortion doctor or two? And you wonder why we call you Fascists?
 
I am not a fan of pornography and am heterosexual as they come. My life has been complete in being faithful to each of my wives; I did not know a woman between the death of the first and my marriage to my second. I rarely drink, I don't smoke, and I don't toke. Having said all this, I also believe that small government cannot regulate such behaviors without becoming massive, intrusive big government in the lives of everyday Americans.

MB is wrong if she thinks that 'small government' can do these things without becoming Big Brother intrusive government. She is a Righty Extremist Religious Fascist that wants to marry her fundamentalist views to government. I oppose such nonsense.

EACH of your wives?
and you're full of shit about Bachmann, that is what you all ALWAYS say about any Conservative candidate, you all said the same thing about Palin. too bad for you you just might be saying, Madame President Bachmann or Palin, eh.:lol:
 
I am not a fan of pornography and am heterosexual as they come. My life has been complete in being faithful to each of my wives; I did not know a woman between the death of the first and my marriage to my second. I rarely drink, I don't smoke, and I don't toke. Having said all this, I also believe that small government cannot regulate such behaviors without becoming massive, intrusive big government in the lives of everyday Americans.

you do realize that that is exactly what gov. has been doing for oh, 70 years? Right?


MB is wrong if she thinks that 'small government' can do these things without becoming Big Brother intrusive government. She is a Righty Extremist Religious Fascist that wants to marry her fundamentalist views to government. I oppose such nonsense.

I agree with that.
 
Because the Conservative Social issues deny rights, divide the country along bigotted lines and promote the erosion of personal freedoms.

It looks as if Conservatives want smaller government when it comes to feeding children, housing the poor and caring for the destitute. But they want bigger, more intrusive government when it comes to personal freedom and bedrooms.

I guess cash trumps freedom in a Conservative mindset.

you are caught up in making values judgments, then, your answer is tantamount to telling anyone that doesn't feel same- to shut up. you realize that....right?

What does your side do? Scream your judgments... lobby for legislation to ban things you don't like? Kill an abortion doctor or two? And you wonder why we call you Fascists?

Diazepam is used to relieve anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures and to control agitation caused by alcohol withdrawal. Diazepam comes as a tablet, extended-release (long-acting) capsule, and concentrate (liquid) to take by mouth. Do not open, chew, or crush the extended-release capsules; swallow them whole....more at-

Diazepam - PubMed Health
 
that sir, is not what I asked you, I am well aware of the content of the issues;

I asked why; is it ok for dems to purse their social issues and reps get hammered for pursing theirs?

Are you claiming that conservatives don't "hammer" Dems on their social issues?

*sigh* did you read the exchanges going back to the point of origin re: my question to Nosmo King?

I had not, when I posted that.

Why should Nosmo King (a liberal) "hammer" people for issues he agrees with?
 
that sir, is not what I asked you, I am well aware of the content of the issues;

I asked why; is it ok for dems to purse their social issues and reps get hammered for pursing theirs?
Because the Conservative Social issues deny rights, divide the country along bigotted lines and promote the erosion of personal freedoms.

It looks as if Conservatives want smaller government when it comes to feeding children, housing the poor and caring for the destitute. But they want bigger, more intrusive government when it comes to personal freedom and bedrooms.

I guess cash trumps freedom in a Conservative mindset.

you are caught up in making values judgments, then, your answer is tantamount to telling anyone that doesn't feel same- to shut up. you realize that....right?
Not to shut up but join in righting wrongs, not deepening divides between Americans. Not shut up, but think about justice and freedom and what America stands for.

There will be a constant struggle between those who desire freedom~ real freedom not just the freedom not to pay your taxes~and those who want to diminish the worth of American citizens.
 
you are caught up in making values judgments, then, your answer is tantamount to telling anyone that doesn't feel same- to shut up. you realize that....right?

What does your side do? Scream your judgments... lobby for legislation to ban things you don't like? Kill an abortion doctor or two? And you wonder why we call you Fascists?

Diazepam is used to relieve anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures and to control agitation caused by alcohol withdrawal. Diazepam comes as a tablet, extended-release (long-acting) capsule, and concentrate (liquid) to take by mouth. Do not open, chew, or crush the extended-release capsules; swallow them whole....more at-

Diazepam - PubMed Health

You really don't like it when someone speaks the truth, do you? Do you NOT scream judgments ad nauseum? Do you NOT Lobby for legislation against people or practices you don't like? Didn't one of your fellow fascists kill an abortion doctor?

Look up Fascism.. and see where extremist right wingers fit into the definition.
 
15th post
What does your side do? Scream your judgments... lobby for legislation to ban things you don't like? Kill an abortion doctor or two? And you wonder why we call you Fascists?

Diazepam is used to relieve anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures and to control agitation caused by alcohol withdrawal. Diazepam comes as a tablet, extended-release (long-acting) capsule, and concentrate (liquid) to take by mouth. Do not open, chew, or crush the extended-release capsules; swallow them whole....more at-

Diazepam - PubMed Health

You really don't like it when someone speaks the truth, do you? Do you NOT scream judgments ad nauseum? Do you NOT Lobby for legislation against people or practices you don't like? Didn't one of your fellow fascists kill an abortion doctor?

Look up Fascism.. and see where extremist right wingers fit into the definition.
First of all, Traj is no fascist so can your kneejerk reaction. Secondly, Traj is not an extremist right winger. Take your valium.

Thirdly, if you think the left is free of violent extremists, you are delusional. Check the most wanted terrorists on the FBI site - Daniel Andreas. He's a lefty. A violent lefty. A terrorist.
 
Last edited:
What does your side do? Scream your judgments... lobby for legislation to ban things you don't like? Kill an abortion doctor or two? And you wonder why we call you Fascists?

Diazepam is used to relieve anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures and to control agitation caused by alcohol withdrawal. Diazepam comes as a tablet, extended-release (long-acting) capsule, and concentrate (liquid) to take by mouth. Do not open, chew, or crush the extended-release capsules; swallow them whole....more at-

Diazepam - PubMed Health

You really don't like it when someone speaks the truth, do you? Do you NOT scream judgments ad nauseum? Do you NOT Lobby for legislation against people or practices you don't like? Didn't one of your fellow fascists kill an abortion doctor?

Look up Fascism.. and see where extremist right wingers fit into the definition.

wtf? I DON'T have any fellow fascist who kill abortion doctors. the IDIOT who did that did it ALL ON THEIR OWN. I am offended you lump me in with that. puke
 
Are you claiming that conservatives don't "hammer" Dems on their social issues?

*sigh* did you read the exchanges going back to the point of origin re: my question to Nosmo King?

I had not, when I posted that.

Why should Nosmo King (a liberal) "hammer" people for issues he agrees with?

this is the original post.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3836254-post243.html


My question was simply, why this is a big deal? everyone pursues their own chosen ideology, and there is no why in this context, imho.

I was just asking where he was coming from, she is no more right than you or me or NK.

There have been many media outlets that have beat the crap out of this, because there is supposed to be a truce or a focus on financial issues, yet, I have never gotten a satisfactory answer as to why those very same media outlets ( and folks here) beat the drum for doma dadt and the dream act in November ( and there after), while bachmann et al gets whacked if they pursue theirs, as if THEY should just stop?

of course we all beat on each other right on left etc etc..thats not even a question in my mind, its who's doing the beating and the hypocrisy that gets to me.
 
Last edited:
What does your side do? Scream your judgments... lobby for legislation to ban things you don't like? Kill an abortion doctor or two? And you wonder why we call you Fascists?

Diazepam is used to relieve anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures and to control agitation caused by alcohol withdrawal. Diazepam comes as a tablet, extended-release (long-acting) capsule, and concentrate (liquid) to take by mouth. Do not open, chew, or crush the extended-release capsules; swallow them whole....more at-

Diazepam - PubMed Health

You really don't like it when someone speaks the truth, do you? Do you NOT scream judgments ad nauseum? Do you NOT Lobby for legislation against people or practices you don't like? Didn't one of your fellow fascists kill an abortion doctor?

Look up Fascism.. and see where extremist right wingers fit into the definition.

I suggested Diazepam because you are waaaaay out in left field as to the remarks and questions I was posing as to the why.......
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom