Austin Police Warning

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

 

[Jackson]

"I'd turn back if I were you."

The Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA) has put up two billboards along Interstate 35 entering Austin after the city council voted last month to cut the Austin police budget. One of them reads: "Warning! Austin defunded police. Enter at your own risk!"

Texas police group puts up billboard warning "enter at your own risk," saying Austin defunded police

They should not have done that. Number one, increase the budget for police.

Number two, the billboard should read, "Warning! Austin increased the police budget. Enter at your own risk!"

 

[SavannahMann]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

 

[eagle1462010]

Liberals pushing the narrative of Police suck........America Sucks...........bend the knee to the flag.....burn it ok.........kill a baby while being born is OK.

Perhaps one day a vaccine can be found to stop this mindless infection............

Oh.........defund the police......and the criminals will all be nice ...........okay...........

 

[fncceo]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

Only as a deterrent.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

You didn’t respond to my point.
Cops respond to crime. Criminals rarely respond to crime.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[SavannahMann]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

You didn’t respond to my point.
Cops respond to crime. Criminals rarely respond to crime.

And it just is not dangerous using the statistical model from Harmonica.

 

[eagle1462010]

The Police are there for the rioters protection......Not law abiding citizens.............Send all the police away...............and try it again................WILD WILD WEST....

Think the looters will be begging for the police to come back............Would do this nation a favor to purge these lunatics .............OH WELL.

 

[pknopp]

Former Austin police officer Walter Dodds was arrested Thursday for allegedly sexually assaulting a woman that he met while responding to a mental health call, according to KXAN-TV.

Former Austin police officer reportedly arrested in connection to sexual assault investigation

 

[harmonica]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

You didn’t respond to my point.
Cops respond to crime. Criminals rarely respond to crime.

And it just is not dangerous using the statistical model from Harmonica.

what's not dangerous?
'''''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer''''''.

All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides

The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…

nypost.com

 

[harmonica]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

you are babbling--your post is nonsense = makes no sense
.....my math is correct--the police make MILLIONS of arrests and MILLIONS of contacts and MILLIONS of traffic stops...they make hundreds of thousands of these before any ONE '''''incident'''' of police brutality

 

[SavannahMann]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

you are babbling--your post is nonsense = makes no sense
.....my math is correct--the police make MILLIONS of arrests and MILLIONS of contacts and MILLIONS of traffic stops...they make hundreds of thousands of these before any ONE '''''incident'''' of police brutality

And all I am doing is applying the same exact formula to other things. If that math is correct for brutality why is it wrong for anything else?

 

[SavannahMann]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

You didn’t respond to my point.
Cops respond to crime. Criminals rarely respond to crime.

And it just is not dangerous using the statistical model from Harmonica.

what's not dangerous?
'''''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer''''''.

All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides

The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…

nypost.com

You are not using your math. The number of interactions. You have to use the same math.

 

[harmonica]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

you are babbling--your post is nonsense = makes no sense
.....my math is correct--the police make MILLIONS of arrests and MILLIONS of contacts and MILLIONS of traffic stops...they make hundreds of thousands of these before any ONE '''''incident'''' of police brutality

And all I am doing is applying the same exact formula to other things. If that math is correct for brutality why is it wrong for anything else?

the math is correct for police brutality --you are babbling

 

[SavannahMann]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

you are babbling--your post is nonsense = makes no sense
.....my math is correct--the police make MILLIONS of arrests and MILLIONS of contacts and MILLIONS of traffic stops...they make hundreds of thousands of these before any ONE '''''incident'''' of police brutality

And all I am doing is applying the same exact formula to other things. If that math is correct for brutality why is it wrong for anything else?

the math is correct for police brutality --you are babbling

Then that formula is good for cops dying. Not a problem. And the cops do not have a dangerous job.

 

[harmonica]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

you are babbling--your post is nonsense = makes no sense
.....my math is correct--the police make MILLIONS of arrests and MILLIONS of contacts and MILLIONS of traffic stops...they make hundreds of thousands of these before any ONE '''''incident'''' of police brutality

And all I am doing is applying the same exact formula to other things. If that math is correct for brutality why is it wrong for anything else?

the math is correct for police brutality --you are babbling

Then that formula is good for cops dying. Not a problem. And the cops do not have a dangerous job.

????!!!irrelevant--you did not prove there is police brutality

 

[SavannahMann]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

you are babbling--your post is nonsense = makes no sense
.....my math is correct--the police make MILLIONS of arrests and MILLIONS of contacts and MILLIONS of traffic stops...they make hundreds of thousands of these before any ONE '''''incident'''' of police brutality

And all I am doing is applying the same exact formula to other things. If that math is correct for brutality why is it wrong for anything else?

the math is correct for police brutality --you are babbling

Then that formula is good for cops dying. Not a problem. And the cops do not have a dangerous job.

????!!!irrelevant--you did not prove there is police brutality

Using your math I proved that cops do not have a dangerous job. If there is no brutality. There is no danger to cops. Simple.

 

[harmonica]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

you are babbling--your post is nonsense = makes no sense
.....my math is correct--the police make MILLIONS of arrests and MILLIONS of contacts and MILLIONS of traffic stops...they make hundreds of thousands of these before any ONE '''''incident'''' of police brutality

And all I am doing is applying the same exact formula to other things. If that math is correct for brutality why is it wrong for anything else?

the math is correct for police brutality --you are babbling

Then that formula is good for cops dying. Not a problem. And the cops do not have a dangerous job.

????!!!irrelevant--you did not prove there is police brutality

Using your math I proved that cops do not have a dangerous job. If there is no brutality. There is no danger to cops. Simple.

that's babble crap---how does that prove there is brutality???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????

 

[SavannahMann]

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

hey--the police are not the problem--blacks committing crime at HIGH rates and graduation at low rates is the problem

Even with police funding at 100% the cops will not and can not protect yous nor can they stop crime from happening.

1. the police are not the problem
2. with less police, you will have more traffic violations/deaths
3. crime will go UP!!!!! look at the shitholes now--looting/vandalism/etc
4. you NEED the police
what world are you living in???

Actually. The Police are a big part of the problem.

Get a glimpse behind the curtain.

The classic phrase drawn from the Wizard of Oz applies here. A cop with twenty years of experience sees things in a new light and lets us glimpse behind the curtain. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/07/tased-in-the-chest-for-23-seconds-dead-for-8-minutes-now-facing-a-lifetime-of-recovery/ It...

www.usmessageboard.com

...so, we have over 20 MILLION police contacts and arrests and how many brutality problems?? 20?? [ and that's the high number ]
....what math class did you go to when we have 1 incident out of 1 MILLION, and that's a problem??
..and that's not counting MILLIONS of traffic stops --with a lot of jackass blacks who want to argue and be jackasses

I made this offer before. I will agree to that mathematical formula if you agree to apply it everywhere to all criminal activity. You declined before didn’t you?

WTH are you yakking about?

Ok. You want to count brutality incidents based not on totals or each event. But based upon the unique formula of interactions.

By that standard. Cops die at about one in what? Five million interactions? One in twenty million interactions? Which means the job is just not dangerous right?
For Rape we have to consider that literally hundreds of millions of interactions occur for each rape. Men talk to women and do not rape them. So by using the same formula Rape is not a problem either.

1.what do cops dying have to do with supposed police brutality????!!!!! what is the math there equating with VERY rare brutality cases?
2. men TALKING to women????? and rape----?????? very ridiculous

The test of a mathematical formula is if it works in any or all situations. Using the same procedures means it is fair. Applying it to the deaths of cops the same way you apply it to police brutality shows that there is no real danger to cops.

Of course you knew the math was bullshit when you posted it.

Except that the cops are confronting violent criminals every time while the violent criminals were dealing with non-violent civil servants every time.
Calculate the probability of danger, factoring in that significant aspect.
You should change your name to Savannahcriminal.

Again. Nonsense. The mathematical model used by Harmonica shows that there are millions of interactions between police and the public before a cop is killed. So millions of the people are not violent criminals and the cops do not face significant danger.

you are babbling--your post is nonsense = makes no sense
.....my math is correct--the police make MILLIONS of arrests and MILLIONS of contacts and MILLIONS of traffic stops...they make hundreds of thousands of these before any ONE '''''incident'''' of police brutality

And all I am doing is applying the same exact formula to other things. If that math is correct for brutality why is it wrong for anything else?

the math is correct for police brutality --you are babbling

Then that formula is good for cops dying. Not a problem. And the cops do not have a dangerous job.

????!!!irrelevant--you did not prove there is police brutality

Using your math I proved that cops do not have a dangerous job. If there is no brutality. There is no danger to cops. Simple.

that's babble crap---how does that prove there is brutality???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????

The very same math. Of Brutality happens in one in ten million interactions. Then the deaths of cops that result in the same one in ten million interactions are not a problem either. You see. Sauce for the goose.