Attorney Jarrett: NY Trump case full of error and prejudice, should be dismissed now

[para bellum]

Yup. And merchans daughter was a beneficiary of that conspiracy, and Dan Goldman FUNDED that conspiracy.

ALL of them need to have an extended stay at the gray bar Hilton.

Trump will be appointing a new US Attorney for the SDNY, and he will have access to all the records...

 

[para bellum]

The system disagrees with you.

Then you won't mind when Trump gives the same treatment to his political enemies...

 

[lafayette]

Then you won't mind when Trump gives the same treatment to his political enemies...

He can't go out of the system. I think he is looking for ways to work together. He wants the lawfare out of the and will forego retribution if he can get most of what he wants: deportation, secure border, and tariffs.

 

[lafayette]

Yup. And merchans daughter was a beneficiary of that conspiracy, and Dan Goldman FUNDED that conspiracy.

ALL of them need to have an extended stay at the gray bar Hilton.

What goofy thinking.

 

[AZrailwhale]

I don’t think so. The case in front of the Appeal Court will reveal to the entire world how the charge and trial was malicious prosecution and election interference. It will be exposed how Bragg and Merchan took an expired misdemeanor and twisted the law into charging multiple felonies with the sole purpose of damaging the Democrats’ #1 political rival.

Merchan and Bragg aren't the ones running things. The are just the frontmen. The people running things are the ones who hand-picked a hostile judge, in a judicial district where ninety five percent of the jury pool voted democratic.

 

[Lisa558]

Merchan and Bragg aren't the ones running things. The are just the frontmen. The people running things are the ones who hand-picked a hostile judge, in a judicial district where ninety five percent of the jury pool voted democratic.

The $64k question: who are they?

 

[lafayette]

The feds are not in charge. Do you understand that, Lisa558.

 

[Lisa558]

The feds are not in charge. Do you understand that, Lisa558.

They did conspire with local DA’s to help them interfere with the election.

 

[lafayette]

They did conspire with local DA’s to help them interfere with the election.

Where's the evidence? MAGA allegations are not evidence.

 

[Rawley]

Where's the evidence? MAGA allegations are not evidence.

Fani Willis met with Kamala Harris before indicting Trump—attorney

Fani Willis met with Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House, according to lawyer Ashley Merchant.

www.newsweek.com

Nathan Wade admitted to multiple White House meetings during Trump Georgia probe, transcript suggests

Former Fulton County special prosecutor Nathan Wade was deposed by the House Judiciary Committee last week.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Lisa558]

Where's the evidence? MAGA allegations are not evidence.

That lover-boy of Fani Willis, whom she hired to work on the case at the highest fee ever paid, had meetings at the White House. A DOJ staffer high up in the ranks left his position to work in the local NY office with Bragg. Both of these are considered evidence.

 

[Lisa558]

Fani Willis met with Kamala Harris before indicting Trump—attorney

Fani Willis met with Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House, according to lawyer Ashley Merchant.

www.newsweek.com

Nathan Wade admitted to multiple White House meetings during Trump Georgia probe, transcript suggests

Former Fulton County special prosecutor Nathan Wade was deposed by the House Judiciary Committee last week.

www.foxnews.com

Oops. I just saw your post after I posted my answer. I basically said the same thing - but you backed it up much better!

 

[lafayette]

Fani Willis met with Kamala Harris before indicting Trump—attorney

Fani Willis met with Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House, according to lawyer Ashley Merchant.

www.newsweek.com

Nathan Wade admitted to multiple White House meetings during Trump Georgia probe, transcript suggests

Former Fulton County special prosecutor Nathan Wade was deposed by the House Judiciary Committee last week.

www.foxnews.com

So what? I have met Presidents and conspired to do nothing. You need evidence.

 

[lafayette]

That lover-boy of Fani Willis, whom she hired to work on the case at the highest fee ever paid, had meetings at the White House. A DOJ staffer high up in the ranks left his position to work in the local NY office with Bragg. Both of these are considered evidence.

No, they are not.

 

[Lisa558]

No, they are not.

Of course they are. The problem is that you don’t understand what evidence is.

 

[lafayette]

Of course they are. The problem is that you don’t understand what evidence is.

Every MAGA accusation is a confession, which you just proved again.

 

[Rawley]

So what? I have met Presidents and conspired to do nothing. You need evidence.

In the White House? Did you indict a former President and the sitting President's political enemy immediately after the meeting? Do tell.

 

[Fang]

Faux News

It's gonna be a long 4 years for you. Seek help for that TDS. LOL