Atlantic Editor Concedes Central Claim Of Trump Hit Piece Could Be Wrong

Hilarious, Labor Day, and Trumpoholics are working their asses off defending the indefensible "Suckers and Losers" comments made by Donnie bone spurs.
Defend no one. Thereā€™s no story
This whole thread is trumpoholics defending an international story and #1 story in America. As usual, Trump defense is denial and delusion.
i
Name the person who said they heard the President say those words.
Tactics and methods used by Trump are now being used against him by his opponents. Hey, "people are saying". Losers and Suckers will be a Trump legacy forever. It will be repeated as folks piss on his grave.
name the person who was in the room and heard Trump say those words? Thanks in advance.

People are saying that Trump called the Military Losers
names of those people other than that it's a lie
This is the one reason why mainstream media must lose their first amendment right protection
Slander is not protected under the first amendment

Just following the lead of our President.

He never names his sources.....Why should I?
so no body heard him say those words it's all a lie?
and interesting that you make another false accusation against the president to dodge this lie against the president.
Many, many people heard it and their stories match

The accusations are true......
Let Trump convince us other wise
Damn right the stories match....

Everyone that has come forward (including Bolton, who is no fan of Trump) stated that the Atlantic is lying....

That's why the editor is backpeddling on his claim.....
Okay, so quote the Atlantic editor backpedaling on his claim then.....

Atlantic Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg admitted the White Houseā€™s account that President Trumpā€™s trip to a cemetery of fallen World War I soldiers in France in 2018 was modified due to bad weather is probably accurate.

Doesnā€˜t say the part about calling soldiers losers is not true
Then his "witnesses" need to step forward (if they even exist)....

No witnesses = no proof....
No they donā€™t.

Trump is once again trying to find and punish those who tell the truth about him. In this case, members of his staff spoke up and when other staff members told the same story, The Atlantic had verifiable sources.

Just because they protect their sources from a vindictive Trump, doesnā€™t make the story false
If they don't come forward, then there isn't any evidence that they even exist ....

See, I could say that 5 people called you a flaming faggot (and said they know it because they caught you in the act}...

Now if you question the allegation, would you consider it "proof" that the allegation is true if I said that I won't tell you who the witnesses are, and that they won't come forward???

Or would you say that my refusal to prove the statement true means that I'm lying????

Anonymous sources are anonymous for a reason. They fear retribution.

Trump has made it clear he will punish any staffer who dares to tell the truth. In this case, we have not one.....but four top staff members independently telling the same story.
There's another reason: Their stories are total horseshit.

As far was we know, we have no one who supports these sleazy accusations. The sources are made up from whole cloth. They don't actually exist.
How bout we have Trump offer immunity to any staffer who comes forward and testifies under oath?


Ask LTC Vindman how Trump reacted when he testified to Congress under oath
Dumb ass Vidman never heard Trump say anything he heard someone say something about something
I heard you like licking balls all the way to the asshole
 
The Atlantic Hoax is Dead ā€“ Bring on the Next Hoax!


7 Sep 2020 ~~ By David Blackmon

So, The Atlanticā€™s ā€œTrump hates the militaryā€ hoax died on the vine after about a 24-hour run. It died for the simple reason that Trumpā€™s public actions consistently in favor of the interests of the U.S. military and its personnel and retirees rendered the anonymously-sourced hit piece transparently unbelievable to anyone with functioning synapses in their cranial cavity, which of course excludes China Joe Biden.
The obvious hope of the Biden/Harris campaign and its corrupt media toadies was that this particular hoax would lead thousands of Trump supporters to finally abandon him out of disgust. Yeah, thatā€™s not going to happen.
No passenger on the Trump Train is leaping off over this story or for any other reason. The only disgust expressed by any real Trump supporter towards anyone involved in the obvious hoax is toward Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg, the Atlanticā€™s corrupt owner who is also the poisonous Black Widow of Steve Jobs, and all the other Democrat media toadies like Jake Tapper and Jennifer Griffin who did everything they could to amplify it.
~[snip]~
Think about it: Among your circle of friends, co-workers and acquaintances, do you know a single Trump supporter who has said he/she is going to vote for Creepy Uncle McWifeMolester on November 3? Of course you donā€™t because those people do not exist.
The corrupt media continues to trot out this parade of ā€œformer Bush officialsā€ and ā€œformer McCain campaign workersā€ and ā€œformer Romney peopleā€ who claim to be all like ā€˜Republicansā€™ and stuff and who just hate Trump and have signed a letter condemning him along with 400 of their fellow sippers of cheap zinfandel, but so what?
~[snip]~
The Atlantic hoax has failed. Miserably. Gloriously. A truly epic fail.
Lacking any other alternative, the Democrats and their media toadies will simply mount the next hoax. We donā€™t know what form it will take or exactly when it will come, but we do know this: It will also be an epic fail, and it will be glorious.
That is all.




Comment:

What they did was put out the ultimate LIE that proves that everything they say is a lie. When it isn't a lie it's still a lie because truth is often determined by context and the context of their lies is always a false narrative.

Harris/Bide and their deep state, MIC, and RINO collaborationists have extended the legal principal of 'falsus in uno falsus in omnibus to falsus in pluribus falsus in omnibus.' (Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus - Wikipedia )
They have lied about so many things so consistently that we just have to assume every word out of their mouths every dot on a printed page is a lie. And our ears are closed to the notion that it could be otherwise.
It's like the lie "the threat is not China, it's Russia," a lie on which Tim Cook and Jobs's the Atlantic owning widow have been trying to bet their fortunes. Once Biden becomes zombie President do you think the CCP is going to refrain from taking everything they want, Apple and Taiwan included. What are we going to do - risk nuclear war? A question you have to turn around on the Chinese and convince them there is a very very bright red white and blue line in the Ocean starting 6 miles off the Chinese coast-line.
They can bet their own fortunes, but we refuse to have them use ours in their efforts. They can't bet ours and that is what they are trying to do.
Consider this.
Why would *any* voter to pick the party of violent rapists, murderers, arsonists, rioters and looters over the GOP at a time when Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat prosecutors are aiding criminals instead of prosecuting them?
PMS/DSA Democrat Leftists want productive people harnessed to their communist schemes or dead. To the Dems, we are the kulaks that Stalin killed by the millions - wreckers and saboteurs and enemies of the state. Why would any productive person vote Democrat? Itā€™s like voting yourself into the grave.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat Leftists are going for broke to eliminate Trump and the GOP... They have failed and they are well aware of their failure. They have only one option Left and are scared to use it...
Could be...

But it's not.

And you know it.
You really need to get that TDS fixed because I don't believe you're going to make it after Trump wins in 2 months
 
How long will our USMB trumpoholics weep, cry, and whine about Trump's "Suckers and Losers" exposed insults? Surely, they can't stay in denial much longer.
There's no need to. The Atlantic has retracted the main point. People who were not afraid to reveal their identities and who were there in France with the President said it never happened. John Bolton didn't put any such bullshit in his book. The President of France said it didn't happen.

Liberals are the only little bitches whining about it now.
That is not seen in this thread, blogs, or news media and The Atlantic hasn't retracted the main point. Far from it. Other media has independently confirmed the main points. The topic is still being discussed every day as a major news story. Advertisements are being made and promoted. The military has turned on Trump big time.
Oh, you mean that hack, Jennifer Griffin from Fox News?


The Atlantic posted bullshit and Jennifer Griffin polished it for them.

Both are dishonest assholes!

Griffin told Fox News that Steve Mnuchin was present when Trump uttered his vile statements. Griffin said this about the Treasury Secretary, ā€œMnuchin was in the Tank meeting at the Pentagon on July 20, 2017, when the president berated the Pentagon four-star generals, calling them losers, and dopes, and babies.ā€


[The story changed ā€” now itā€™s generals who were called losers and babies.]




Griffin continued, ā€œSo when Mnuchin says heā€™s never heard the president speak that way of the military or to generals thatā€™s patently false.ā€


ā€œI confirmed with people who were present at the meeting the president use those exact words in the Pentagon,ā€ Griffin unequivocally stated.


How in the world can she confirm gossip and stick up for gossip as if it was fact?
Poor Donald. The world is so mean to him. No one should be allowed to talk badly about Donald.
Talking badly about the president because of bad policies is one thing creating lies about them is a totally different story.
 
Hilarious, Labor Day, and Trumpoholics are working their asses off defending the indefensible "Suckers and Losers" comments made by Donnie bone spurs.
Defend no one. Thereā€™s no story
This whole thread is trumpoholics defending an international story and #1 story in America. As usual, Trump defense is denial and delusion.
i
Name the person who said they heard the President say those words.
Tactics and methods used by Trump are now being used against him by his opponents. Hey, "people are saying". Losers and Suckers will be a Trump legacy forever. It will be repeated as folks piss on his grave.
name the person who was in the room and heard Trump say those words? Thanks in advance.

People are saying that Trump called the Military Losers
names of those people other than that it's a lie
This is the one reason why mainstream media must lose their first amendment right protection
Slander is not protected under the first amendment

Just following the lead of our President.

He never names his sources.....Why should I?
so no body heard him say those words it's all a lie?
and interesting that you make another false accusation against the president to dodge this lie against the president.
Many, many people heard it and their stories match

The accusations are true......
Let Trump convince us other wise
Damn right the stories match....

Everyone that has come forward (including Bolton, who is no fan of Trump) stated that the Atlantic is lying....

That's why the editor is backpeddling on his claim.....
Bolton clears things up in his book he wrote. Bet he now regrets writing that in his book.
 
H
Hilarious, Labor Day, and Trumpoholics are working their asses off defending the indefensible "Suckers and Losers" comments made by Donnie bone spurs.
Defend no one. Thereā€™s no story
This whole thread is trumpoholics defending an international story and #1 story in America. As usual, Trump defense is denial and delusion.
i
Name the person who said they heard the President say those words.
Tactics and methods used by Trump are now being used against him by his opponents. Hey, "people are saying". Losers and Suckers will be a Trump legacy forever. It will be repeated as folks piss on his grave.
name the person who was in the room and heard Trump say those words? Thanks in advance.

People are saying that Trump called the Military Losers
names of those people other than that it's a lie
This is the one reason why mainstream media must lose their first amendment right protection
Slander is not protected under the first amendment

Just following the lead of our President.

He never names his sources.....Why should I?
so no body heard him say those words it's all a lie?
and interesting that you make another false accusation against the president to dodge this lie against the president.
Many, many people heard it and their stories match

The accusations are true......
Let Trump convince us other wise
Damn right the stories match....

Everyone that has come forward (including Bolton, who is no fan of Trump) stated that the Atlantic is lying....

That's why the editor is backpeddling on his claim.....
Bolton clears things up in his book he wrote. Bet he now regrets writing that in his book.
He does no such thing.
 
Sb7gwUz.gif
Just because you hate the guy is no reason to abandon the truth completely.
You hate Trump, you want it to be true, good enough right? The funny thing is you go around saying everyone else is duped.
You sure use the word "hate" a lot.

I'm not like you. Thankfully.
 
Hilarious, Labor Day, and Trumpoholics are working their asses off defending the indefensible "Suckers and Losers" comments made by Donnie bone spurs.
Defend no one. Thereā€™s no story
This whole thread is trumpoholics defending an international story and #1 story in America. As usual, Trump defense is denial and delusion.
i
Name the person who said they heard the President say those words.
Tactics and methods used by Trump are now being used against him by his opponents. Hey, "people are saying". Losers and Suckers will be a Trump legacy forever. It will be repeated as folks piss on his grave.
name the person who was in the room and heard Trump say those words? Thanks in advance.

People are saying that Trump called the Military Losers
names of those people other than that it's a lie
This is the one reason why mainstream media must lose their first amendment right protection
Slander is not protected under the first amendment

Just following the lead of our President.

He never names his sources.....Why should I?
so no body heard him say those words it's all a lie?
and interesting that you make another false accusation against the president to dodge this lie against the president.
Many, many people heard it and their stories match

The accusations are true......
Let Trump convince us other wise
Damn right the stories match....

Everyone that has come forward (including Bolton, who is no fan of Trump) stated that the Atlantic is lying....

That's why the editor is backpeddling on his claim.....
Okay, so quote the Atlantic editor backpedaling on his claim then.....

Atlantic Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg admitted the White Houseā€™s account that President Trumpā€™s trip to a cemetery of fallen World War I soldiers in France in 2018 was modified due to bad weather is probably accurate.

Doesnā€˜t say the part about calling soldiers losers is not true
Then his "witnesses" need to step forward (if they even exist)....

No witnesses = no proof....
No they donā€™t.

Trump is once again trying to find and punish those who tell the truth about him. In this case, members of his staff spoke up and when other staff members told the same story, The Atlantic had verifiable sources.

Just because they protect their sources from a vindictive Trump, doesnā€™t make the story false
If they don't come forward, then there isn't any evidence that they even exist ....

See, I could say that 5 people called you a flaming faggot (and said they know it because they caught you in the act}...

Now if you question the allegation, would you consider it "proof" that the allegation is true if I said that I won't tell you who the witnesses are, and that they won't come forward???

Or would you say that my refusal to prove the statement true means that I'm lying????

Anonymous sources are anonymous for a reason. They fear retribution.

Trump has made it clear he will punish any staffer who dares to tell the truth. In this case, we have not one.....but four top staff members independently telling the same story.
There's another reason: Their stories are total horseshit.

As far was we know, we have no one who supports these sleazy accusations. The sources are made up from whole cloth. They don't actually exist.
How bout we have Trump offer immunity to any staffer who comes forward and testifies under oath?


Ask LTC Vindman how Trump reacted when he testified to Congress under oath
You DO know that Vindman's career had already reached a dead end when he was reprimanded for denigrating our troops to the Russians during a military exercise, don't you???
 
Hilarious, Labor Day, and Trumpoholics are working their asses off defending the indefensible "Suckers and Losers" comments made by Donnie bone spurs.
Defend no one. Thereā€™s no story
This whole thread is trumpoholics defending an international story and #1 story in America. As usual, Trump defense is denial and delusion.
i
Name the person who said they heard the President say those words.
Tactics and methods used by Trump are now being used against him by his opponents. Hey, "people are saying". Losers and Suckers will be a Trump legacy forever. It will be repeated as folks piss on his grave.
name the person who was in the room and heard Trump say those words? Thanks in advance.

People are saying that Trump called the Military Losers
names of those people other than that it's a lie
This is the one reason why mainstream media must lose their first amendment right protection
Slander is not protected under the first amendment

Just following the lead of our President.

He never names his sources.....Why should I?
so no body heard him say those words it's all a lie?
and interesting that you make another false accusation against the president to dodge this lie against the president.
Many, many people heard it and their stories match

The accusations are true......
Let Trump convince us other wise
Damn right the stories match....

Everyone that has come forward (including Bolton, who is no fan of Trump) stated that the Atlantic is lying....

That's why the editor is backpeddling on his claim.....
Okay, so quote the Atlantic editor backpedaling on his claim then.....

Atlantic Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg admitted the White Houseā€™s account that President Trumpā€™s trip to a cemetery of fallen World War I soldiers in France in 2018 was modified due to bad weather is probably accurate.

Doesnā€˜t say the part about calling soldiers losers is not true
Then his "witnesses" need to step forward (if they even exist)....

No witnesses = no proof....
No they donā€™t.

Trump is once again trying to find and punish those who tell the truth about him. In this case, members of his staff spoke up and when other staff members told the same story, The Atlantic had verifiable sources.

Just because they protect their sources from a vindictive Trump, doesnā€™t make the story false
If they don't come forward, then there isn't any evidence that they even exist ....

See, I could say that 5 people called you a flaming faggot (and said they know it because they caught you in the act}...

Now if you question the allegation, would you consider it "proof" that the allegation is true if I said that I won't tell you who the witnesses are, and that they won't come forward???

Or would you say that my refusal to prove the statement true means that I'm lying????

Anonymous sources are anonymous for a reason. They fear retribution.

Trump has made it clear he will punish any staffer who dares to tell the truth. In this case, we have not one.....but four top staff members independently telling the same story.
There's another reason: Their stories are total horseshit.

As far was we know, we have no one who supports these sleazy accusations. The sources are made up from whole cloth. They don't actually exist.
How bout we have Trump offer immunity to any staffer who comes forward and testifies under oath?


Ask LTC Vindman how Trump reacted when he testified to Congress under oath
You DO know that Vindman's career had already reached a dead end when he was reprimanded for denigrating our troops to the Russians during a military exercise, don't you???
When did that happen? Can you provide a link? All I found was an alleged verbal reprimand by a retired Trump Allie made during Vindman's testimony. Nothing official in his military record.
 
Last edited:
It's only dead in the minds of Trumpsters.
partisan trump haters like you will accept the smear as factual even though you have no proof

but the rest of America aint falling for that lie

And now, even though it has been exposed as a lie, 2,6 months when talking about the next lie, theyā€™ll insert a comment about this as though it were fact. By then their fellow travelers at google will have scrubbed any article proving it was a hoax.

theyā€˜re evil bastards.
 
Hilarious, Labor Day, and Trumpoholics are working their asses off defending the indefensible "Suckers and Losers" comments made by Donnie bone spurs.
Defend no one. Thereā€™s no story
This whole thread is trumpoholics defending an international story and #1 story in America. As usual, Trump defense is denial and delusion.
i
Name the person who said they heard the President say those words.
Tactics and methods used by Trump are now being used against him by his opponents. Hey, "people are saying". Losers and Suckers will be a Trump legacy forever. It will be repeated as folks piss on his grave.
name the person who was in the room and heard Trump say those words? Thanks in advance.

People are saying that Trump called the Military Losers
names of those people other than that it's a lie
This is the one reason why mainstream media must lose their first amendment right protection
Slander is not protected under the first amendment

Just following the lead of our President.

He never names his sources.....Why should I?
so no body heard him say those words it's all a lie?
and interesting that you make another false accusation against the president to dodge this lie against the president.
Many, many people heard it and their stories match

The accusations are true......
Let Trump convince us other wise
Damn right the stories match....

Everyone that has come forward (including Bolton, who is no fan of Trump) stated that the Atlantic is lying....

That's why the editor is backpeddling on his claim.....
Okay, so quote the Atlantic editor backpedaling on his claim then.....

Atlantic Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg admitted the White Houseā€™s account that President Trumpā€™s trip to a cemetery of fallen World War I soldiers in France in 2018 was modified due to bad weather is probably accurate.

Doesnā€˜t say the part about calling soldiers losers is not true
Then his "witnesses" need to step forward (if they even exist)....

No witnesses = no proof....
No they donā€™t.

Trump is once again trying to find and punish those who tell the truth about him. In this case, members of his staff spoke up and when other staff members told the same story, The Atlantic had verifiable sources.

Just because they protect their sources from a vindictive Trump, doesnā€™t make the story false
If they don't come forward, then there isn't any evidence that they even exist ....

See, I could say that 5 people called you a flaming faggot (and said they know it because they caught you in the act}...

Now if you question the allegation, would you consider it "proof" that the allegation is true if I said that I won't tell you who the witnesses are, and that they won't come forward???

Or would you say that my refusal to prove the statement true means that I'm lying????

Anonymous sources are anonymous for a reason. They fear retribution.

Trump has made it clear he will punish any staffer who dares to tell the truth. In this case, we have not one.....but four top staff members independently telling the same story.
There's another reason: Their stories are total horseshit.

As far was we know, we have no one who supports these sleazy accusations. The sources are made up from whole cloth. They don't actually exist.
How bout we have Trump offer immunity to any staffer who comes forward and testifies under oath?


Ask LTC Vindman how Trump reacted when he testified to Congress under oath
You DO know that Vindman's career had already reached a dead end when he was reprimanded for denigrating our troops to the Russians during a military exercise, don't you???
When did that happen? Can you provide a link? All I found was an alleged verbal reprimand by a retired Trump Allie made during Vindman's testimony. Nothing official in his military record.
Gee, you don't want to accept a witness that's willing to come forward???

Doesn't that beat a "witness" that doesn't even want their name associated with an allegation???
 
Hilarious, Labor Day, and Trumpoholics are working their asses off defending the indefensible "Suckers and Losers" comments made by Donnie bone spurs.
Defend no one. Thereā€™s no story
This whole thread is trumpoholics defending an international story and #1 story in America. As usual, Trump defense is denial and delusion.
i
Name the person who said they heard the President say those words.
Tactics and methods used by Trump are now being used against him by his opponents. Hey, "people are saying". Losers and Suckers will be a Trump legacy forever. It will be repeated as folks piss on his grave.
name the person who was in the room and heard Trump say those words? Thanks in advance.

People are saying that Trump called the Military Losers
names of those people other than that it's a lie
This is the one reason why mainstream media must lose their first amendment right protection
Slander is not protected under the first amendment

Just following the lead of our President.

He never names his sources.....Why should I?
so no body heard him say those words it's all a lie?
and interesting that you make another false accusation against the president to dodge this lie against the president.
Many, many people heard it and their stories match

The accusations are true......
Let Trump convince us other wise
Damn right the stories match....

Everyone that has come forward (including Bolton, who is no fan of Trump) stated that the Atlantic is lying....

That's why the editor is backpeddling on his claim.....
Okay, so quote the Atlantic editor backpedaling on his claim then.....

Atlantic Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg admitted the White Houseā€™s account that President Trumpā€™s trip to a cemetery of fallen World War I soldiers in France in 2018 was modified due to bad weather is probably accurate.

Doesnā€˜t say the part about calling soldiers losers is not true
Then his "witnesses" need to step forward (if they even exist)....

No witnesses = no proof....
No they donā€™t.

Trump is once again trying to find and punish those who tell the truth about him. In this case, members of his staff spoke up and when other staff members told the same story, The Atlantic had verifiable sources.

Just because they protect their sources from a vindictive Trump, doesnā€™t make the story false
If they don't come forward, then there isn't any evidence that they even exist ....

See, I could say that 5 people called you a flaming faggot (and said they know it because they caught you in the act}...

Now if you question the allegation, would you consider it "proof" that the allegation is true if I said that I won't tell you who the witnesses are, and that they won't come forward???

Or would you say that my refusal to prove the statement true means that I'm lying????

Anonymous sources are anonymous for a reason. They fear retribution.

Trump has made it clear he will punish any staffer who dares to tell the truth. In this case, we have not one.....but four top staff members independently telling the same story.
There's another reason: Their stories are total horseshit.

As far was we know, we have no one who supports these sleazy accusations. The sources are made up from whole cloth. They don't actually exist.
How bout we have Trump offer immunity to any staffer who comes forward and testifies under oath?


Ask LTC Vindman how Trump reacted when he testified to Congress under oath
You DO know that Vindman's career had already reached a dead end when he was reprimanded for denigrating our troops to the Russians during a military exercise, don't you???
When did that happen? Can you provide a link? All I found was an alleged verbal reprimand by a retired Trump Allie made during Vindman's testimony. Nothing official in his military record.
Gee, you don't want to accept a witness that's willing to come forward???

Doesn't that beat a "witness" that doesn't even want their name associated with an allegation???
Well, he was never willing to make an official or recorded reprimand. He only made his claim after Vindman had testified under oath. Even then, his complaint was a nothing burger.
 
It all comes down to....

Who do we believe?

Has Trump earned our trust? Has he ever deceived us? Does his past behavior show he would never say such a thing?

Let the voters decide
Stopped backing the Atlantic magazine pack of lies, huh? That's at least ONE smart thing you have done.

Will the voters believe Trumps repeated denials?


He is like the boy who cryā€™s wolf. After a while he loses credibility.

The military is turning on Trump. A vote he canā€™t afford to lose

Trump never cried wolf and he has loads of credibility. The only people who think he doesn't are lefty loons just like you. Lefty loons who think foot in mouth Biden would make a good POTUS.

Trump has done more for the military than the last four Presidents and they know it.
No question his followers who would ignore him shooting someone on Fifth Avenue will believe him.

The rest of the public and the military will not
funny stuff, that's not correct it takes context to all things that happen. blanket statement of choice rather than fact makes you a hypocrite. you surely haven't probably cared about the business properties looted and burned, right? be a man and admit you're a hypocrite and truly do not care if someone is shot or hurt by violence.
 
Hilarious, Labor Day, and Trumpoholics are working their asses off defending the indefensible "Suckers and Losers" comments made by Donnie bone spurs.
Defend no one. Thereā€™s no story
This whole thread is trumpoholics defending an international story and #1 story in America. As usual, Trump defense is denial and delusion.
i
Name the person who said they heard the President say those words.
Tactics and methods used by Trump are now being used against him by his opponents. Hey, "people are saying". Losers and Suckers will be a Trump legacy forever. It will be repeated as folks piss on his grave.
name the person who was in the room and heard Trump say those words? Thanks in advance.

People are saying that Trump called the Military Losers
names of those people other than that it's a lie
This is the one reason why mainstream media must lose their first amendment right protection
Slander is not protected under the first amendment

Just following the lead of our President.

He never names his sources.....Why should I?
so no body heard him say those words it's all a lie?
and interesting that you make another false accusation against the president to dodge this lie against the president.
Many, many people heard it and their stories match

The accusations are true......
Let Trump convince us other wise
Damn right the stories match....

Everyone that has come forward (including Bolton, who is no fan of Trump) stated that the Atlantic is lying....

That's why the editor is backpeddling on his claim.....
Okay, so quote the Atlantic editor backpedaling on his claim then.....

Atlantic Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg admitted the White Houseā€™s account that President Trumpā€™s trip to a cemetery of fallen World War I soldiers in France in 2018 was modified due to bad weather is probably accurate.

Doesnā€˜t say the part about calling soldiers losers is not true
Then his "witnesses" need to step forward (if they even exist)....

No witnesses = no proof....
No they donā€™t.

Trump is once again trying to find and punish those who tell the truth about him. In this case, members of his staff spoke up and when other staff members told the same story, The Atlantic had verifiable sources.

Just because they protect their sources from a vindictive Trump, doesnā€™t make the story false
If they don't come forward, then there isn't any evidence that they even exist ....

See, I could say that 5 people called you a flaming faggot (and said they know it because they caught you in the act}...

Now if you question the allegation, would you consider it "proof" that the allegation is true if I said that I won't tell you who the witnesses are, and that they won't come forward???

Or would you say that my refusal to prove the statement true means that I'm lying????

Anonymous sources are anonymous for a reason. They fear retribution.

Trump has made it clear he will punish any staffer who dares to tell the truth. In this case, we have not one.....but four top staff members independently telling the same story.
There's another reason: Their stories are total horseshit.

As far was we know, we have no one who supports these sleazy accusations. The sources are made up from whole cloth. They don't actually exist.
How bout we have Trump offer immunity to any staffer who comes forward and testifies under oath?


Ask LTC Vindman how Trump reacted when he testified to Congress under oath
Why would he grant immunity to sleazy douchebags who want to stab him in the bacK?
 
Hilarious, Labor Day, and Trumpoholics are working their asses off defending the indefensible "Suckers and Losers" comments made by Donnie bone spurs.
Defend no one. Thereā€™s no story
This whole thread is trumpoholics defending an international story and #1 story in America. As usual, Trump defense is denial and delusion.
i
Name the person who said they heard the President say those words.
Tactics and methods used by Trump are now being used against him by his opponents. Hey, "people are saying". Losers and Suckers will be a Trump legacy forever. It will be repeated as folks piss on his grave.
name the person who was in the room and heard Trump say those words? Thanks in advance.

People are saying that Trump called the Military Losers
names of those people other than that it's a lie
This is the one reason why mainstream media must lose their first amendment right protection
Slander is not protected under the first amendment

Just following the lead of our President.

He never names his sources.....Why should I?
so no body heard him say those words it's all a lie?
and interesting that you make another false accusation against the president to dodge this lie against the president.
Many, many people heard it and their stories match

The accusations are true......
Let Trump convince us other wise
Damn right the stories match....

Everyone that has come forward (including Bolton, who is no fan of Trump) stated that the Atlantic is lying....

That's why the editor is backpeddling on his claim.....
Okay, so quote the Atlantic editor backpedaling on his claim then.....

Atlantic Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg admitted the White Houseā€™s account that President Trumpā€™s trip to a cemetery of fallen World War I soldiers in France in 2018 was modified due to bad weather is probably accurate.

Doesnā€˜t say the part about calling soldiers losers is not true
Then his "witnesses" need to step forward (if they even exist)....

No witnesses = no proof....
No they donā€™t.

Trump is once again trying to find and punish those who tell the truth about him. In this case, members of his staff spoke up and when other staff members told the same story, The Atlantic had verifiable sources.

Just because they protect their sources from a vindictive Trump, doesnā€™t make the story false
If they don't come forward, then there isn't any evidence that they even exist ....

See, I could say that 5 people called you a flaming faggot (and said they know it because they caught you in the act}...

Now if you question the allegation, would you consider it "proof" that the allegation is true if I said that I won't tell you who the witnesses are, and that they won't come forward???

Or would you say that my refusal to prove the statement true means that I'm lying????

Anonymous sources are anonymous for a reason. They fear retribution.

Trump has made it clear he will punish any staffer who dares to tell the truth. In this case, we have not one.....but four top staff members independently telling the same story.
There's another reason: Their stories are total horseshit.

As far was we know, we have no one who supports these sleazy accusations. The sources are made up from whole cloth. They don't actually exist.
How bout we have Trump offer immunity to any staffer who comes forward and testifies under oath?


Ask LTC Vindman how Trump reacted when he testified to Congress under oath
Why would he grant immunity to sleazy douchebags who want to stab him in the bacK?

Winner, winner Chicken Dinner!

Why Trumps staff needs to remain anonymous if they want to tell the truth
 
Fuck everyday journalism. What's important is to label people faggots and call that "news."
Actually, I saw an article in the National Enquirer that said aliens landed in Roswell, screwed all the sheep and jackasses, and gave us Democrats....

Now that's journalism!!!!

They even named their sources, and they had pictures!!!!

Guess that really proves that they are credible, doesn't it????
You read the National Enquirer.. 'Nuff said.

You believe The Atlantic's "anonymous sources" . . . 'Nuff said.
 

Forum List

Back
Top