Atlantic Editor Concedes Central Claim Of Trump Hit Piece Could Be Wrong

[Doc7505]

Some douche weasel I was talking to, when I said, "Names, or it didn't happen", responded with "Get real. You would just question their reputation and trustworthiness and still refuse to believe them if you knew who they were." As though that were somehow a bad thing, or as if I wasn't already doing that EVEN MORE because I DON'T know who they are. And, of course, as if the left isn't doing the exact same thing to the witnesses who have come forward to say it never happened.

I will never understand how leftists can all what they do "logical thinking".

Come on Jeff Goldberg has always been a weasel and a low life.

 

[Doc7505]

Here's What the Media Won't Tell You ​

About the Atlantic Hit Piece​

Here's What the Media Won't Tell You About the Atlantic Hit Piece

pjmedia.com

25 Mar 2025 ~~ By Matt Margolis

The left-wing media went into overdrive on Monday following a report by Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic that he was mistakenly included in a chat on Signal with senior Trump administration officials. Goldberg claims that the top national security officials were coordinating a military strike through the group chat.
CNN’s Scott Jennings destroyed the narrative from Goldberg’s article and the subsequent claims from the left-wing media.

The magazine’s hit piece, published Monday, alleged that senior officials — including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Vice President JD Vance, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth — used the encrypted messaging app to plan an operation in Yemen. Goldberg, who was mistakenly added to the chat, claimed he initially thought it was a hoax until airstrikes confirmed its authenticity.
CNN’s John Berman framed the controversy as a potential legal violation, suggesting that the Trump administration endangered national security. But when asked about it, Jennings responded with a reality check.

​

~Snip~
Goldberg has repeatedly sacrificed his credibility and the credibility of The Atlantic to push false narratives to undermine Trump. His track record of dishonest reporting speaks for itself, making skepticism not just reasonable but necessary. Given how eagerly the mainstream media rushed to declare the Steele dossier legitimate — only for it to be exposed as a sham — there’s every reason to doubt Goldberg’s framing of this story.

​

While legacy media fixates on process stories and supposed scandals, the bottom line remains clear: The Trump administration took decisive action to protect American interests, while its critics scramble to fabricate controversy.

Commentary:
Hmmm,,,,. Was this a setup by someone on the inside? In fact, it was Joe Biden who authorized the use of Signal for government communications, according to Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Seems
The devices were preloaded.
Now we turn our focus on treason. Calling defendant Jeffrey Goldberg to the stand.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Here's What the Media Won't Tell You ​

About the Atlantic Hit Piece​

Here's What the Media Won't Tell You About the Atlantic Hit Piece

pjmedia.com

25 Mar 2025 ~~ By Matt Margolis

The left-wing media went into overdrive on Monday following a report by Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic that he was mistakenly included in a chat on Signal with senior Trump administration officials. Goldberg claims that the top national security officials were coordinating a military strike through the group chat.
CNN’s Scott Jennings destroyed the narrative from Goldberg’s article and the subsequent claims from the left-wing media.

The magazine’s hit piece, published Monday, alleged that senior officials — including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Vice President JD Vance, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth — used the encrypted messaging app to plan an operation in Yemen. Goldberg, who was mistakenly added to the chat, claimed he initially thought it was a hoax until airstrikes confirmed its authenticity.
CNN’s John Berman framed the controversy as a potential legal violation, suggesting that the Trump administration endangered national security. But when asked about it, Jennings responded with a reality check.

​

~Snip~
Goldberg has repeatedly sacrificed his credibility and the credibility of The Atlantic to push false narratives to undermine Trump. His track record of dishonest reporting speaks for itself, making skepticism not just reasonable but necessary. Given how eagerly the mainstream media rushed to declare the Steele dossier legitimate — only for it to be exposed as a sham — there’s every reason to doubt Goldberg’s framing of this story.

​

While legacy media fixates on process stories and supposed scandals, the bottom line remains clear: The Trump administration took decisive action to protect American interests, while its critics scramble to fabricate controversy.

Commentary:
Hmmm,,,,. Was this a setup by someone on the inside? In fact, it was Joe Biden who authorized the use of Signal for government communications, according to Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Seems
The devices were preloaded.
Now we turn our focus on treason. Calling defendant Jeffrey Goldberg to the stand.

/---/ If this asshat found he was unintentionally joined in on a security briefing, why didn't he immediately announce it and disconnect?

 

[hadit]

/---/ If this asshat found he was unintentionally joined in on a security briefing, why didn't he immediately announce it and disconnect?

That is the correct question to ask.

 

[jc456]

Here's What the Media Won't Tell You ​

About the Atlantic Hit Piece​

Here's What the Media Won't Tell You About the Atlantic Hit Piece

pjmedia.com

25 Mar 2025 ~~ By Matt Margolis

The left-wing media went into overdrive on Monday following a report by Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic that he was mistakenly included in a chat on Signal with senior Trump administration officials. Goldberg claims that the top national security officials were coordinating a military strike through the group chat.
CNN’s Scott Jennings destroyed the narrative from Goldberg’s article and the subsequent claims from the left-wing media.

The magazine’s hit piece, published Monday, alleged that senior officials — including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Vice President JD Vance, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth — used the encrypted messaging app to plan an operation in Yemen. Goldberg, who was mistakenly added to the chat, claimed he initially thought it was a hoax until airstrikes confirmed its authenticity.
CNN’s John Berman framed the controversy as a potential legal violation, suggesting that the Trump administration endangered national security. But when asked about it, Jennings responded with a reality check.

​

~Snip~
Goldberg has repeatedly sacrificed his credibility and the credibility of The Atlantic to push false narratives to undermine Trump. His track record of dishonest reporting speaks for itself, making skepticism not just reasonable but necessary. Given how eagerly the mainstream media rushed to declare the Steele dossier legitimate — only for it to be exposed as a sham — there’s every reason to doubt Goldberg’s framing of this story.

​

While legacy media fixates on process stories and supposed scandals, the bottom line remains clear: The Trump administration took decisive action to protect American interests, while its critics scramble to fabricate controversy.

Commentary:
Hmmm,,,,. Was this a setup by someone on the inside? In fact, it was Joe Biden who authorized the use of Signal for government communications, according to Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Seems
The devices were preloaded.
Now we turn our focus on treason. Calling defendant Jeffrey Goldberg to the stand.

did anyone get fired for the assassination attempt on trump? just wondering and again, the hypocrisy of the demofks is substantial

 

[jc456]

Also, when the previous fbi guy was discussing the probability of things it was always under investigation and he couldn't talk about it. Transparency is happening here.

 

[Doc7505]

Does This Shocking Revelation Prove a Conspiracy in 'Signalgate' Controversy?​

Does This Shocking Revelation Prove a Conspiracy in 'Signalgate' Controversy?

pjmedia.com

27 Mar 2025 ~~ Matt Margolis

Something smells fishy about the latest developments in the ongoing 'Signalgate' situation, and it's not just The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg's questionable ethics in lurking in private government communications. A deeper dive into Signal reveals connections that should have every American concerned about the intersection of Big Tech, liberal media, and government communications.
The Biden administration specifically approved Signal for sensitive government communications, choosing it over other available platforms.
Enter Katherine Maher, the CEO of National Public Radio (NPR). Maher has shown herself to be anything but politically neutral. How extreme are we talking?
Back in 2020, Maher called Trump a “fascist” and a “deranged racist sociopath” and said that America is “addicted to white supremacy,” has publicly chastised using the phrase “boy and girl” because it “erases the language of non-binary people.”
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) called her out for her radical views Wednesday during a congressional hearing.
This is the same person who defended NPR's decision to completely ignore the Hunter Biden laptop story while simultaneously claiming that it's not biased. You can't make this stuff up.
What does this have to do with “Signalgate”? I’m glad you asked. Let's connect some dots here.
It turns out that Maher, the current CEO of NPR, who testified before Congress on Wednesday, sits on the board of directors of Signal.

xxxxxxxxxx
​

~Snip~
The deeper this story goes, the more it looks less like a simple security breach and more like a symptom of a much larger problem: the incestuous relationship between Big Tech, liberal media, and government operations. It's time for Congress to start asking some tough questions.

Commentary:
Simply put, the Trump administration should consider everything having to do with Biden administration era technology to be as bugged as that desk they had to take out of the Oval office.
For this reason alone "Signal" should be abandoned.
Probably every enemy nation state (and enemy MSM) has back door access.
The real scandal about "Signal" is that anyone seriously thought that this was serving a legitimate purpose. All we need is a CIA gold seal of approval and we know that it had no pedigree whatsoever except to enable the CIA to keep tabs on everyone.
Operationally there is little difference between something that is "classified" and something that is "Sensitive." Things are classified because they are sensitive. A collection of unclassified information that comprises and operational security breech is in some books classified. Folks need to stop splitting legalistic threads here unless they are sitting in the hot seat trying to explain why the release of a specific piece of sensitive info was embarrassing, but not illegal,

 

[otto105]

Does This Shocking Revelation Prove a Conspiracy in 'Signalgate' Controversy?​

Does This Shocking Revelation Prove a Conspiracy in 'Signalgate' Controversy?

pjmedia.com

27 Mar 2025 ~~ Matt Margolis

Something smells fishy about the latest developments in the ongoing 'Signalgate' situation, and it's not just The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg's questionable ethics in lurking in private government communications. A deeper dive into Signal reveals connections that should have every American concerned about the intersection of Big Tech, liberal media, and government communications.
The Biden administration specifically approved Signal for sensitive government communications, choosing it over other available platforms.
Enter Katherine Maher, the CEO of National Public Radio (NPR). Maher has shown herself to be anything but politically neutral. How extreme are we talking?
Back in 2020, Maher called Trump a “fascist” and a “deranged racist sociopath” and said that America is “addicted to white supremacy,” has publicly chastised using the phrase “boy and girl” because it “erases the language of non-binary people.”
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) called her out for her radical views Wednesday during a congressional hearing.
This is the same person who defended NPR's decision to completely ignore the Hunter Biden laptop story while simultaneously claiming that it's not biased. You can't make this stuff up.
What does this have to do with “Signalgate”? I’m glad you asked. Let's connect some dots here.
It turns out that Maher, the current CEO of NPR, who testified before Congress on Wednesday, sits on the board of directors of Signal.

xxxxxxxxxx
​

~Snip~
The deeper this story goes, the more it looks less like a simple security breach and more like a symptom of a much larger problem: the incestuous relationship between Big Tech, liberal media, and government operations. It's time for Congress to start asking some tough questions.

Commentary:
Simply put, the Trump administration should consider everything having to do with Biden administration era technology to be as bugged as that desk they had to take out of the Oval office.
For this reason alone "Signal" should be abandoned.
Probably every enemy nation state (and enemy MSM) has back door access.
The real scandal about "Signal" is that anyone seriously thought that this was serving a legitimate purpose. All we need is a CIA gold seal of approval and we know that it had no pedigree whatsoever except to enable the CIA to keep tabs on everyone.
Operationally there is little difference between something that is "classified" and something that is "Sensitive." Things are classified because they are sensitive. A collection of unclassified information that comprises and operational security breech is in some books classified. Folks need to stop splitting legalistic threads here unless they are sitting in the hot seat trying to explain why the release of a specific piece of sensitive info was embarrassing, but not illegal,

This ^^^^^^^ is just more stupid ass trump defense syndrome bullshit from the fuckup crowd.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Does This Shocking Revelation Prove a Conspiracy in 'Signalgate' Controversy?​

Does This Shocking Revelation Prove a Conspiracy in 'Signalgate' Controversy?

pjmedia.com

27 Mar 2025 ~~ Matt Margolis

Something smells fishy about the latest developments in the ongoing 'Signalgate' situation, and it's not just The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg's questionable ethics in lurking in private government communications. A deeper dive into Signal reveals connections that should have every American concerned about the intersection of Big Tech, liberal media, and government communications.
The Biden administration specifically approved Signal for sensitive government communications, choosing it over other available platforms.
Enter Katherine Maher, the CEO of National Public Radio (NPR). Maher has shown herself to be anything but politically neutral. How extreme are we talking?
Back in 2020, Maher called Trump a “fascist” and a “deranged racist sociopath” and said that America is “addicted to white supremacy,” has publicly chastised using the phrase “boy and girl” because it “erases the language of non-binary people.”
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) called her out for her radical views Wednesday during a congressional hearing.
This is the same person who defended NPR's decision to completely ignore the Hunter Biden laptop story while simultaneously claiming that it's not biased. You can't make this stuff up.
What does this have to do with “Signalgate”? I’m glad you asked. Let's connect some dots here.
It turns out that Maher, the current CEO of NPR, who testified before Congress on Wednesday, sits on the board of directors of Signal.

xxxxxxxxxx
​

~Snip~
The deeper this story goes, the more it looks less like a simple security breach and more like a symptom of a much larger problem: the incestuous relationship between Big Tech, liberal media, and government operations. It's time for Congress to start asking some tough questions.

Commentary:
Simply put, the Trump administration should consider everything having to do with Biden administration era technology to be as bugged as that desk they had to take out of the Oval office.
For this reason alone "Signal" should be abandoned.
Probably every enemy nation state (and enemy MSM) has back door access.
The real scandal about "Signal" is that anyone seriously thought that this was serving a legitimate purpose. All we need is a CIA gold seal of approval and we know that it had no pedigree whatsoever except to enable the CIA to keep tabs on everyone.
Operationally there is little difference between something that is "classified" and something that is "Sensitive." Things are classified because they are sensitive. A collection of unclassified information that comprises and operational security breech is in some books classified. Folks need to stop splitting legalistic threads here unless they are sitting in the hot seat trying to explain why the release of a specific piece of sensitive info was embarrassing, but not illegal,

/----/ Remember Vindman? Trump used Signal to keep the nosy Trump haters out of sensitive conversations and prevent leaks. Unfortunately, Signal has its flaws too.

 

[otto105]

/----/ Remember Vindman? Trump used Signal to keep the nosy Trump haters out of sensitive conversations and prevent leaks. Unfortunately, Signal has its flaws too.

So, he broke national security protocols back then too.

 

[jc456]

So, he broke national security protocols back then too.

Vindman did if it was classified.

 

[otto105]

Vindman did if it was classified.

So, still an idiot I see.

 

[jc456]

So, still an idiot I see.

don't you hate it when you get an answer to a question you asked that proves my point? you're welcome. Hey, ask us anything.

 

[otto105]

don't you hate it when you get an answer to a question you asked that proves my point? you're welcome. Hey, ask us anything.

YOU stated that shitler! used other communication channels to evade national security protocols in his first failed term.

Just as his team and him are doing in the second.

 

[jc456]

YOU stated that shitler! used other communication channels to evade national security protocols in his first failed term.

Just as his team and him are doing in the second.

xiden team used the same platform seems your agitated. you're a demofk November 5th baby

 

[otto105]

xiden team used the same platform seems your agitated. you're a demofk November 5th baby

proof?

 

[JusticeHammer]

proof?

You're talking

 

[otto105]

You're talking

What are you hearing fuckup? Voices?

 

[JusticeHammer]

What are you hearing fuckup? Voices?

Your f'ckedup voice crying like a good little pussy.

 

[otto105]

Your f'ckedup voice crying like a good little pussy.

Hilarious wanker.