GLASNOST
Platinum Member
Provide some and we’ll see.
Evidence.What would you accept?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Provide some and we’ll see.
Evidence.What would you accept?
Honestly... it sounds like you are expecting a one way conversation where God does all the work. It's like you expect the creator of existence to jump through your hoops. Does that seem reasonable to you?A genuine two-way conversation with "God" would have been nice.
Like what? I'm not going to play a guessing game.Evidence.
All I can tell you is that a notional belief isn't going to cut it. You must seek him in earnest and humility. Or not. Your loss, not his.I understand your beliefs. I done been born and raised southern baptist, got myself dunked and the whole nine yards. So I know how it supposedly works.
It just doesn't work for me in any kind of objectively verifiable way.
Evidence.
The available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.Like what?
Nope! What do you believe? Answer the questionWhat I (we) do not believe is infinitely more important than what we do believe. Anyway, you wrote in your OP, “atheists have nothing to say against faith in God”. If that's true then I believe that's a good thing. But didn’t I already tell you that? Is there something else you'd like to know about what I believe?
Honestly... it sounds like you are expecting a one way conversation where God does all the work. It's like you expect the creator of existence to jump through your hoops. Does that seem reasonable to you?
I guess I'll have to take the loss if and when it comes then.All I can tell you is that a notional belief isn't going to cut it. You must seek him in earnest and humility. Or not. Your loss, not his.
I have to say I've been known to poke fun at the adherents of the products of Bronze Age desert superstitions.Should they? Theists have a ton of things to say against other Theists. Particularly Christians. They slander the Jews. They slander the Moslems. They slander the Hindus. They slander the Buddhists. Even among themselves. Catholics and Protestants don’t like each other. Worst of all are the Mormons. They hate and slander everyone. Agnostics slander no one. Agnostics don’t hate anyone. I don’t know if Atheists say anything against faith in God so I’ll take your word for it that they don’t. But that’s a good thing ….. isn’t it?![]()
Many, many hay paddocks died for those straw men.More to the point, isn't atheism just one more religion? They believe in the unprovable. They can no more prove their faith in the universe being just an object coming from mere dust as most religious people can prove the existence of God--- both are essentially just different faiths. The main difference being that:
BOTH recognize the role of consciousness, just that while theists believe our finite consciousness came from a supreme, higher consciousness, atheists believe that our consciousness came from random chance and spontaneous generation.
- Formal religions are generally a faith in a /personal/ universe, headed by some deity, supreme intelligence, and cause of all causes headed by a supreme consciousness and compassion.
- Atheism is really just another religion, a faith in an /impersonal/ universe, where all comes about by accident and random chance, and random combinations resulting in order.
THE DIFFERENCE being that while theists believe in an absolute moral order with God being the guiding light, atheists believe morality is relative with no one but man himself to set the rules, define the boundaries, and to guide human activity.
It is more likely they don't believe that, going on their history of disbelief.Atheists believe that human beings are the highest form of intelligence in the universe.
Is that like an atheist Muslim?That's not surprising given that most Jews are atheists. You're probably one yourself.
Valid morals are those community norms which assist the survival and prosperity of the community.A better question is why would atheists believe being moral was important?I know many atheists who are moral.
Is absence of evidence evidence of absence?Then prove there is no god. Before toy make fool of your sef by claiming you cant prove a negative we can and do it all the time. We use null hypothesis or a significant negative correlation. Go ahead
Of course they are and must be so. Different societies will have differentMorals are effectively standards. Standards exist for logical reasons. They can't be just whatever society says they are.
In which case, like the House Speaker, you say gawd told you to do it.And no one can actually prove them wrong. More to the point, atheists want to believe that man is answerable only to himself, sets his own rules and conduct, a far more appetizing position than having some higher authority one must answer to! Especially if you are a government wanting to call all of the shots.
What I (we) do not believe is infinitely more important than what we do believe. Anyway, you wrote in your OP, “atheists have nothing to say against faith in God”. If that's true then I believe that's a good thing. But didn’t I already tell you that? Is there something else you'd like to know about what I believe?
OK. Well, let me see now. If I am going to reply spontaneously:Nope! What do you believe? Answer the question

Can't blame you there, cnm.I have to say I've been known to poke fun at the adherents of the products of Bronze Age desert superstitions.
Speaking as an athiest, no I don't. I don't believe that at all.Atheists believe that human beings are the highest form of intelligence in the universe.