Zone1 Atheists have nothing to say against faith in God

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How can what the creator created not be used as evidence?

This entails a fallacy called "begging the question".

 

[Dante]

Atheists have nothing to say against faith in God. They believe in things that they can’t explain or prove. Check this out and let’s see atheists squirm:

Whatever are you going on about here? It's puzzling. Are you trying to make a point?

 

[ding]

This entails a fallacy called "begging the question".

No. It's how investigations are performed. I don't need to know who the creator was to examine the evidence of his creation to learn things about the person who created it. So try again.

 

[ding]

Whatever are you going on about here? It's puzzling. Are you trying to make a point?

Yes, but it was an ill conceived idea that was poorly executed.

How did that not go in the hole!!!! If you don't golf, you won't get the joke.

 

[Chuz Life]

I'm neither religious nor an atheist so I thought I would check this out.

Both sides exhibit blind faith.

I think that is objectively true.

Thus, I remain agnostic.

 

[dblack]

Atheists have nothing to say against faith in God.

I certainly don't.

I think that's the case for most atheists.

 

[Dante]

Yes, but it was an ill conceived idea that was poorly executed.

How did that not go in the hole!!!! If you don't golf, you won't get the joke.

and I don't Golf.

 

[Dante]

I'm neither religious nor an atheist so I thought I would check this out.

Both sides exhibit blind faith.

I think that is objectively true.

Thus, I remain agnostic.

Wrong. Atheists' views change with science discoveries.

 

[Dante]

I certainly don't.

I think that's the case for most atheists.

B-i-n-g-o!

ty

 

[ding]

I certainly don't.

I think that's the case for most atheists.

Most atheists don't typically post in religious forums.

 

[Chuz Life]

Wrong. Atheists' views change with science discoveries.

I call.

Does an abortion kill a child?

 

[Dante]

Does an abortion kill a child?

Define "child" and off you go.

 

[Dante]

Does an abortion kill a child?

MAybe you'd help society more if you focused on saving the living rather than that not yet born

 

[ding]

Wrong. Atheists' views change with science discoveries.

Who doesn't? My issue is more with people who have elevated science to a religion and have practically no understanding of the science.

 

[Chuz Life]

Define "child" and off you go.

Use your science.

 

[Dante]

Who doesn't? My issue is more with people who have elevated science to a religion and have practically no understanding of the science.

Nobody has "elevated science into a religion" That is a narrative that is spun from people who engage in debates before crowds. Religious people have been fighting against scientific discoveries since science was first made public.

Of course members of the "Church" were scientists and there's a long history of that with arguments about who said what, who believed what, etc .. but none of hat negates the facts about Religious People Attacking Science

 

[Chuz Life]

MAybe you'd help society more if you focused on saving the living rather than that not yet born

A child in the womb is not living?

Did your science tell you that?

 

[Dante]

Use your science.

My science?

"Child" is not a scientific term

 

[Dante]

A child in the womb is not living?

Did your science tell you that?

A plant, a vegetable is living.

 

[Dante]

A child in the womb is not living?

Did your science tell you that?

A single cell organism is "living"