Atheist Anti-Science - The Multiverse

[ChemEngineer]

Conflating atheism and science is like mixing bleach and ammonia in the toilet of your mind.

My mind does not have a toilet. Atheists constantly feign scientific and intellectual supremacy, like you and so many other Leftists do. I challenge the anti-science of atheists constantly. You on the other hand, make childish non-comparisons and think yourself cute. Grow up and act like an adult.

 

[Dante]

My mind does not have a toilet. Atheists constantly feign scientific and intellectual supremacy, like you and so many other Leftists do. I challenge the anti-science of atheists constantly. You on the other hand, make childish non-comparisons and think yourself cute. Grow up and act like an adult.

Didn't mean to infer your mind has a toilet. Apologies. Thought it was obvious that I see your mind as a toilet. You keep attacking people with labels and conflating things. Then you appear to reference religious shit as if you're holier than thou.

You have masked (poorly) your trolling spam intentions in this thread.

 

[Donald H]

From the people that brought us the Moon landings and Human contributions to Climate Change being real things:

Cygnus X-1​

Imagine the Universe!

This site is intended for students age 14 and up, and for anyone interested in learning about our universe.

imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov

So you don't believe in the moon landings and climate change?
You have a lot of good company on both, but probably still not in the majority.

 

[Dante]

So you don't believe in the moon landings and climate change?
You have a lot of good company on both, but probably still not in the majority.

What is your problem with grasping things? Do you even know what you are responding to?

 

[Donald H]

Due to your numerous inane replies, I had you on IGNORE and had to click a link to read what you said to make someone else make fun of your ignorance. I'm almost sorry I clicked the link now. You are a complete waste of time.
The Anthropic Principle is strictly scientific. Only YOU thumped the Bible. If you have anything of a scientific and common sense nature to contribute, by all means do so. But I deal in science and you clearly do not.

Irrational Atheism

irrational-atheism.blogspot.com

If you are claiming to deal in science, you misspoke when you criticized 'a' theists.

It's only fair that I say that your didn't say that you deal 'only' in science.

I consider your behaviour to be childish on account of you turning to personal attacks that appear to be motivated by me discounting Christian beliefs, that I consider to be nonsense.

We can start over again if you like/

 

[Donald H]

How can atheists delude themselves that there is an infinite number of universes to try to circumvent the Anthropic Principle which is a scientific analysis of the statistical insuperability of physical constants necessary for THE ONLY universe possible, ours?

The link to Sabine's explanation is worth your time. But she offers the same argument against the god too.

That's as controversial to me as it will be to you.

But 'I' wouldn't ever attempt to discredit her, based on her understanding that no god exists. I'll just say that there's another learned and valued opinion on the multiverse.

If you're a Christian, do you have the final answer?

 

[Donald H]

What is your problem with grasping things? Do you even know what you are responding to?

Not completely, due to your wording of your doubt on the moon landings and climate change. You've attempted to raise the questions, but haven't offered your opinions.

 

[Dante]

Not completely, due to your wording of your doubt on the moon landings and climate change. You've attempted to raise the questions, but haven't offered your opinions.

seek some help immediately

 

[Dante]

From the people that brought us the Moon landings and Human contributions to Climate Change being real things:

Cygnus X-1​

Imagine the Universe!

This site is intended for students age 14 and up, and for anyone interested in learning about our universe.

imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov

Donald H please look at the link with the comment. Then stop replying to my posts here. Too weird.

 

[MarathonMike]

You do not understand the Anthropic Principle.
If any of several dozen physical constants were smaller or larger by a very tiny fraction, some billionth of trillionths, our universe would not have formed. If any other "multiverse" had different constants, it would not have formed either. Atheists turn science and statistics upside down in their desperation to be "right." They never will be.; They face either eternal darkness or eternal misery - not a good selection to face.

It is never a good thing for religion to intervene on science. For example:

In February-March 1616, the Catholic Church issued a prohibition against the Copernican theory of the earth's motion. This led later (1633) to the Inquisition trial and condemnation of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) as a suspected heretic, which generated a controversy that continues to our day.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Didn't mean to infer your mind has a toilet. Apologies. Thought it was obvious that I see your mind as a toilet. You keep attacking people with labels and conflating things. Then you appear to reference religious shit as if you're holier than thou.

You have masked (poorly) your trolling spam intentions in this thread.

You don't like to learn, do you? I enjoy teaching and do it all the time even if some ignorati, such as you, misconstrue it and smear me. I brought up science, NOT religion. I referenced the anti-science nonsense of atheists to help others see through their destructive lies. This is what you call " religious shit."

I have nothing to mask or hide. You ignore the message and try to slay the messenger. This is what atheists do all the time when they thump the Bible as the first ones to bring it up, just as you did.

Ciao brutto
You just earned a place on my Ignore List
If you don't like what I write, why don't you add me to your Ignore List, or do you prefer stalking and harassing, like so many others who hate learning.

 

[Dante]

You don't like to learn, do you...I brought up science, NOT religion.

Religion.

A simple search would bring you to Wikipedia:

Atheism, in the broadest sense, is an absence of belief in the existence of deities. Less broadly, atheism is a rejection of the belief that any deities exist.

 

[ChemEngineer]

It is never a good thing for religion to intervene on science. For example:

In February-March 1616, the Catholic Church issued a prohibition against the Copernican theory of the earth's motion. This led later (1633) to the Inquisition trial and condemnation of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) as a suspected heretic, which generated a controversy that continues to our day.

You're right up to date, aren't you Mike? 1616, only 408 years ago. It's fine for science to overrule and negate religion but not the converse to you and millions of others like you.
In fact many brilliant scientists have done just that and will always continue to do so, for the simple reason that they are not mutually exclusive as you seem to think.

I wrote a book, Science of the Bible. You should read it. Perhaps it will change your mind.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Atheists don't debate.

They simply feign moral and intellectual superiority. Atheists marry less, have fewer children, are less happy, and commit suicide more. Atheists abandon their nihilistic religion more than anyone else, according to a Pew research study, and for obviously good reasons!

"Every thinking man is an atheist," wrote Ernest Hemingway. Years later he put his shotgun in his mouth and pulled the trigger. His father, also an atheist, killed himself as well.

Incidentally, the Unabomber was an atheist and had a well-worn book in his rathole cabin, viz., Earth in the Balance, by Al Ecohypocrite Gore.

http://Irrational-Atheism.blogspot.com

 

[Dante]

My mind does not have a toilet. Atheists constantly feign scientific and intellectual supremacy, like you and so many other Leftists do. I challenge the anti-science of atheists constantly. You on the other hand, make childish non-comparisons and think yourself cute. Grow up and act like an adult.

not sure wtf you're getting at

 

[para bellum]

How can atheists delude themselves that there is an infinite number of universes to try to circumvent the Anthropic Principle which is a scientific analysis of the statistical insuperability of physical constants necessary for THE ONLY universe possible, ours?

You are misstating the Anthropic Principle. It does not demand only one possible universe. It says there is no point to argue design of our universe based on the constants, because in a universe based on different constants, would not be here to debate the question.

M-Theory is not physics, it is Metaphysics. It makes no testable predictions, it is not disprovable, it is not science.

 

[ChemEngineer]

LiLYou are misstating the Anthropic Principle. It does not demand only one possible universe. It says there is no point to argue design of our universe based on the constants, because in a universe based on different constants, would not be here to debate the question.

M-Theory is not physics, it is Metaphysics. It makes no testable predictions, it is not disprovable, it is not science.

Like the typical atheist, you play wordgames devoid of substance.

We are in the ONLY POSSIBLE UNIVERSE, and the statistics of the numerous physical constants in our universe are insuperable - in other words, impossible under naturalistic conditions. This can ONLY mean intelligent design, and the Designer is obviously Nature's God as He is called in America's Declaration of Independence. The more science we have learned, the closer it has brought us to its Creator. I describe many of our profound fortuitous interdependences in my book. You should read it. Five-star reviews and a medical doctor called it "beyond incredible." I would never have thought of such a stunning compliment for myself.

Moreover Mathematical Proof of Nature's God


______________________________________

 

[abu afak]

Having been laughed out of the Science section, the Reverend Chemtaker tries to escape real debate and instead post his gospel shlt here in this one.

(He also has 2/3 of the Sci section posters on Ignore on every mb he's still allowed to post on)

 

[para bellum]

Like the typical atheist, you play wordgames devoid of substance.

We are in the ONLY POSSIBLE UNIVERSE, and the statistics of the numerous physical constants in our universe are insuperable - in other words, impossible under naturalistic conditions. This can ONLY mean intelligent design, and the Designer is obviously Nature's God as He is called in America's Declaration of Independence. The more science we have learned, the closer it has brought us to its Creator. I describe many of our profound fortuitous interdependences in my book. You should read it. Five-star reviews and a medical doctor called it "beyond incredible." I would never have thought of such a stunning compliment for myself.

Moreover Mathematical Proof of Nature's God

Posting in giant fonts does not make your assertion more true.

If the laws and physical constants of the universe were something different, we would live in a different universe, and you would be making the same argument about that universe...

That is the anthropic principle in a nutshell. Your mathematical proofs are just arguments of incredulity, the anthropic principle answers them- no further explanation is needed.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Posting in giant fonts does not make your assertion more true.

If the laws and physical constants of the universe were something different, we would live in a different universe, and you would be making the same argument about that universe...

That is the anthropic principle in a nutshell. Your mathematical proofs are just arguments of incredulity, the anthropic principle answers them- no further explanation is needed.

One may as well try to teach a pigeon as talk to an atheist such as you.

The Anthropic Principle was based on the science that if any one of several physical constants were infinitesimally different, no universe could have formed - not ours and not any in your godless imagination. You can't make up crap and convince anyone who knows anything.

Finally, these normal fonts are too small and difficult to see in less than optimal light and conditions, so I modify them for myself in particular. If it is upsetting to your tender, godless, whiny sensitivities, all the better.

____________________________________

_________________________________________________