Let me ask you, do you think our current voting system is any less fair? I mean, let's say we all got to vote whether or not we take Flopper's money on USMB, would you call that fair if we could?
Of course not. You would be the minority of course and have no control over your very own money. That's what we have today in our voting system, we have people voting money out of other people's pockets, some not even born yet.
That's one thing, but the other are the ignorant voters. We seen the videos of the Obama money or Obama phone people. It not only reveals the ignorance of our electorate, but supports my point of voting for other people's money to give to them.
As far as a test is concerned, it would be totally unbiased and non-partisan. No questions about Democrat or Republican issues, just to insure people have the very least understanding of our government to vote. Some sample questions would be: Who is the Speaker of the House? What party do they represent? Who is the Vice President? What party does he represent? Is the United States in debt? If so, by how much?
These are basic things people need to know in order to properly vote. It can be multiple choice with five possible answers, and none of the questions directed at any particular party or issue.
Would you object to that? Of course you would. Why? Because the Democrat party has the ignorant voter base secure; people with the extent of political knowledge Republicans are for the rich people and Democrats for the poor and working. Even though untruthful, that's all they understand about this country and I think we would do much better in our government by weeding those people out so they can't vote.