Assessment of Michael Cohen’s “credibility”

[Couchpotato]

That's what the legal system is for dumb ass. It's there to go after crooks. Political, or otherwise.

And 3 entities who already investigated this incident with more resources, and actual jurisdiction found no criminal activity which is the point, dumb ass.

 

[Couchpotato]

Actually this is about going after a crook, who used the presidency to shield himself from prosecution for 4 years, hoping the statute of limitations would run out.

Trump has been in legal trouble most of his life, but he was always able to get one of his "fixers" to pay people off, to make the problem go away.

But Trump is too much of a grifter to let being president stop his violations of law. So the cases against him took a hiatus, while he was in office, and have now come home to roost.

Ummmm the only reason Stormy Daniels came forward with the story and he paid her to keep quiet about it was because he was running for President.... Had he not run for President there would be no "crime".

 

[WorldWatcher]

Ummmm the only reason Stormy Daniels came forward with the story and he paid her to keep quiet about it was because he was running for President.... Had he not run for President there would be no "crime".

Even if he was running for President, paying a porn star to not disclose that you boinked her while your wife was at home having just given birth to your son isn't a crime.

What is causing the FPOTUS all the problems is the coverup in trying to hide the payment. That's where it gets into the realm of campaign finance laws and falsifying business records.

WW

 

[JustAGuy1]

Says Fox entertainment network, remember they said themselves they are not a news network. I think it'll come down to who lies the most and no one beats trump. He even believes his own lies, that's how crazy he is. Should have been locked up years ago.

And yet not a word about Biden's lifetime of lies. Go figure.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Nobody should believe anything Cohen says without corraberating evidence, and there seems to be tons of that. I'm curious as to why they didn't bother to ask Cohen any more questions after Costello's testimony. He was on hand for any additional questions they might have.

Such as?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Agreed. It's fair to question Cohen because he has been found guilty of lying. That's why it's so important to have corraberating evidence. I hear they have tons of that.

Such as?

 

[JustAGuy1]

Goes to the credibility of the witness.

No matter how Trump answers that question, he's TOAST.

You got him this time....dumbass.

 

[Couchpotato]

Even if he was running for President, paying a porn star to not disclose that you boinked her while your wife was at home having just given birth to your son isn't a crime.

What is causing the FPOTUS all the problems is the coverup in trying to hide the payment. That's where it gets into the realm of campaign finance laws and falsifying business records.

WW

And 3 entities the FEC, the Southern District of NY and the Mueller investigation looked at and determined that a crime hadnt occurred. What could this DA who's using the same witnesses that those entities had have uncovered? It's not like this "crime" is all that complicated. Trump ***** PS, PS is going to go public, Trump gives Cohen 130k to pay off PS for NDA, said payment is marked as legal services which is the "crime". What am I missing?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Even if he was running for President, paying a porn star to not disclose that you boinked her while your wife was at home having just given birth to your son isn't a crime.

What is causing the FPOTUS all the problems is the coverup in trying to hide the payment. That's where it gets into the realm of campaign finance laws and falsifying business records.

WW

Wrong answer.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If any other person committed as much fraud as trump has they'd been in prison long ago. When trump said he could murder someone on fifth avenue and get away with it he wasn't kidding. I'm sure some of the people he robbed, he also killed. If he never goes to prison in this life, I pitu him in the next.

Pitu?

 

[Delldude]

A transfer of money between Mike Cohen and President Trump could have been for anything. The only "proof" that is offered to show it was for some allegedly illicit purpose is the self serving statement of a Convicted Serial Liar. That's really not proof at all

Except Cohen's testimony.

 

[Delldude]

There is nothing on it's face that's illegal about writing a check. It's how the check is recorded in the financial records that makes a difference. And those records weren't available until Trump had left office.

Think of it like having a locked briefcase in your possession. Until you can get the means to open it, would you know what's inside.

The federal charge DOJ could have persued previously without Trumps tax returns......but they chose no to, why is that?

 

[Couchpotato]

Goes to the credibility of the witness.

No matter how Trump answers that question, he's TOAST.

The question would be objected to as irrelevant and sustained. What possible reason could the prosecution have for asking that question? How does his answer relate to the crime he's being accused of?

 

[WorldWatcher]

And 3 entities the FEC, the Southern District of NY and the Mueller investigation looked at and determined that a crime hadnt occurred. What could this DA who's using the same witnesses that those entities had have uncovered? It's not like this "crime" is all that complicated. Trump ***** PS, PS is going to go public, Trump gives Cohen 130k to pay off PS for NDA, said payment is marked as legal services which is the "crime". What am I missing?

The FEC looked at Federal campaign laws, not State Campaign Laws. You know this talk of indictment is NY state law based not federal law based, right?

THE SDNY Federal laws, not Laws.

Mueller didn't look into New York State campaign and business laws pertaining to paying a porn star to bury a story about the candidate boinking said porn star while his wife was home having just given birth to their son as part of a political campaign at all.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Even if he was running for President, paying a porn star to not disclose that you boinked her while your wife was at home having just given birth to your son isn't a crime.

What is causing the FPOTUS all the problems is the coverup in trying to hide the payment. That's where it gets into the realm of campaign finance laws and falsifying business records.

WW

Wrong answer.

You don't think the New York State Manhattan District Attorney, if charges are decided upon, will not be charging the FPOTUS under NY campaign and business laws?

What laws do you think the NY DA will use?

WW

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Goes to the credibility of the witness.

No matter how Trump answers that question, he's TOAST.

Why would he answer a question?

 

[Polishprince]

Ummmm the only reason Stormy Daniels came forward with the story and he paid her to keep quiet about it was because he was running for President.... Had he not run for President there would be no "crime".

To me, it really just sounds like Ms. Daniels and her lawyer Mike Avenatti were trying to shakedown President Trump, and I wonder if Extortion charges could be filed against the pair.

Whether Trump actually fornicated with Daniels is pretty irrelevant I'd say.

Although from what I've heard, Daniels said the man that she fucked had a small penis, but Trump's testimony during the 2016 debates with Little Marco contradicts that. She undoubtably was ******* someone else.

 

[Couchpotato]

The FEC looked at Federal campaign laws, not State Campaign Laws. You know this talk of indictment is NY state law based not federal law based, right?

THE SDNY Federal laws, not Laws.

Mueller didn't look into New York State campaign and business laws pertaining to paying a porn star to bury a story about the candidate boinking said porn star while his wife was home having just given birth to their son as part of a political campaign at all.

WW

Yeah. So that he could raise the predicate misdemeanor to a felony and extend the statute of limitations.

 

[Couchpotato]

To me, it really just sounds like Ms. Daniels and her lawyer Mike Avenatti were trying to shakedown President Trump, and I wonder if Extortion charges could be filed against the pair.

Whether Trump actually fornicated with Daniels is pretty irrelevant I'd say.

Although from what I've heard, Daniels said the man that she fucked had a small penis, but Trump's testimony during the 2016 debates with Little Marco contradicts that. She undoubtably was ******* someone else.

What?

 

[WorldWatcher]

What?

He thinks speaking at a debate and talking about the size of his dick is "testimony".

[Ignoring the fact the debates were in 2016 and the Stormy Daniels sandal for paying a porn star for sex while your wife is home having just given birth to your son didn't break until 2018.]

WW