Assad to Netanyahu: Help Me Control the Region and I Guarantee You a Calm Golan

[Phoenall]

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

It will be , duh , we are the ones supplying the rebels. We want you gone and we want to put one of our men in charge of Syria, because we want to control Syria and Lebanon.

That being from the branch of islamic extremism that you are a follower of. Imagine what the M.E minus Israel would be like if the west just let them get on with it, there would be no oil flowing and dead bodies piled up high. Disease would be ravaging the population and the death rate would be around 90%. And best of all there would be no palestine to worry about as they would have been used as cannon fodder to feed the internal wars

Its hard but I imagine it'd be a lot more peaceful.

BULLSHIT it would be just another islamonazi hell hole that would demand nuclear technology so they could destroy the world.

All I see is us destroying other countries. If only we could leave those Arab countries alone, they would not want to come to Europe or the US, but hey I'd run from bombs too.

Read the koran and see what it says about that, it is a command from their god to take over the world. And that is just what they are trying to do, so time to stop them at the gates out of mecca and not the gates into the USA. OPEN YOUR EYES TO THE REALITY AND TRUTH OF ISLAM

 

[Bleipriester]

The Israelis know Assad is the lesser of two evils. It wouldn't surprise me if they would try to get some concessions from Assad in exchange for covert assistance, but the Israelis aren't going to do anything to topple Assad.

Precisely, in fact we both have bigger worries than a long beard conflict.

Bleipriester

Yes, this conflict should finally end. The big question is if the Israeli government´s agenda allows a final settlement.

Any progress is a progress my friend.

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

 

[Roudy]

I love these Shiite vs Sunni food fights.

 

[Bleipriester]

But it isn´t. Religion in this war doesn´t matter but only for terrorists. The majority of the SAA is Sunni, religious phrases, like "Allah akbar", are not in the army´s vocabulary though, as it is the multi-religious force of a secular government.

 

[Freeman]

Precisely, in fact we both have bigger worries than a long beard conflict.

Bleipriester

Yes, this conflict should finally end. The big question is if the Israeli government´s agenda allows a final settlement.

Any progress is a progress my friend.

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

What's about the settlers of the Golan?

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Yes, this conflict should finally end. The big question is if the Israeli government´s agenda allows a final settlement.

Any progress is a progress my friend.

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

What's about the settlers of the Golan?

The Golan was annexed by Israel in 1981 (I was there at the time). So the Israelis who live there are citizens of Israel and not settlers.

 

[Hossfly]

Any progress is a progress my friend.

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

What's about the settlers of the Golan?

The Golan was annexed by Israel in 1981 (I was there at the time). So the Israelis who live there are citizens of Israel and not settlers.

The Druze enjoy living on the Golan Heights. Maybe freeman should stop by for a little visit with them, and they could tell him to stop bad mouthing Israel.

Golan Druze Leader: UN Accusation Of Israel Hardships A Joke?

 

[RoccoR]

ForeverYoung436, Freeman, Bleipriester, Daniyel, et al,

Both the pro-Palestinians and pro-Syrians have some erroneous belief that the descriptor of "settlers" is some sort of bad or evil word. It is not. It all "settler" means it someone who "migrated to an area with the intent to established a permanent residence. It has no connotation as to good or evil --- legal or illegal.

It is important to remember, that from the standpoint of the 1949 Armistice, the Syria never pursued a Peace Treaty Arrangement. Technically, while a ceasefire was in place, Israel and Syria were still at War from 1948. In April 1967, Syria broke the ceasefire with a Syrian MiG air battle --- re-opening hostilities.

Prior to the start of the war, attacks conducted against Israel by fledgling Palestinian guerrilla groups based in Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan had increased, leading to costly Israeli reprisals. In November 1966 an Israeli strike on the village of Al-Samūʿ in the Jordanian West Bank left 18 dead and 54 wounded, and, during an air battle with Syria in April 1967, the Israeli Air Force shot down six Syrian MiG fighter jets. In addition, Soviet intelligence reports in May indicated that Israel was planning a campaign against Syria, and, although inaccurate, the information further heightened tensions between Israel and its Arab neighbours.
SOURCE: Six Day War
By The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica

Any progress is a progress my friend.

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

What's about the settlers of the Golan?

The Golan was annexed by Israel in 1981 (I was there at the time). So the Israelis who live there are citizens of Israel and not settlers.

(COMMENT)

Oddly enough...

On the last two days (June 9–10, 1967) of the Six-Day War, the Israeli armed forces, after defeating Egypt and Jordan, turned their attention to Syria. Under cover of the Israel Air Force, engineer troops built access roads up the steep Golan Heights, which were then frontally assaulted by armoured vehicles and infantry. The Syrian defenders and most of the Arab inhabitants fled, and Syria asked for an armistice; fighting ceased on June 10. The heights were placed under Israeli military administration, and Golan was integrated into the communications and financial framework of Israel. By the late 1970s nearly 30 Jewish settlements had been established on the heights, and in 1981 Israel unilaterally annexed the area.
SOURCE: Golan Heights
By The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica

Egypt and Syria cried like babies for Soviet help as they lost ever more forces. Damascus within range of the IDF and the Egyptian 3d Army 100,000 killed, captured or encircled.

In October 1973, both Syria and Egypt launched a coordinated attack (The Yom Kipper War) Again, this reopened the 1948 War --- breaking the Armistice Arrangements. Both the US and USSR opened emergency supply lines into their respective areas of interest. The USSR was not interested in Peace Talks so long as the Arab had the upper hand in the conflict. And the Arabs gained the initial advantage supported by the 1973 Oil Embargo. But the on the Syrian Front, the IDF eventually recovered from the surprise attack and rolled within artillery range of Damascus. The Soviets were deathly afraid and made a panic gesture -- threatening to open a nuclear conflict if the IDF did not back-off (the current reason for the Israelis to maintain the status quo on the Non-Proliferations Treaty (NPT). The IDF withdrew to the Golan Heights parameter. Similarly, the IDF, surround the Egyptian 3 Army and cutting them off from supplies, the USSR again threatened to open a nuclear conflict if the IDF did attempted to destroy the Egyptian Army.

Important Background:
The little-known US-Soviet confrontation during Yom Kippur War
Global Post 26 October 2012

OCTOBER 06, 1973 : THE YOM KIPPUR WAR BRINGS UNITED STATES AND USSR TO BRINK OF CONFLICT
The History Channel

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Phoenall]

Yes, this conflict should finally end. The big question is if the Israeli government´s agenda allows a final settlement.

Any progress is a progress my friend.

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

What's about the settlers of the Golan?

They should be forcibly evicted back to their islamonazi hell holes as the land was granted to the Jews under international law. The arab muslims have no legal claim to the land

 

[Penelope]

Any progress is a progress my friend.

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

What's about the settlers of the Golan?

The Golan was annexed by Israel in 1981 (I was there at the time). So the Israelis who live there are citizens of Israel and not settlers.

Illegally , so they are merely settlers.

 

[Phoenall]

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

What's about the settlers of the Golan?

The Golan was annexed by Israel in 1981 (I was there at the time). So the Israelis who live there are citizens of Israel and not settlers.

Illegally , so they are merely settlers.

Wrong unless you are saying that Jordan is illegally settled by arab muslims, as the same international law applies to trans Jordan as applies to the Golan . Remember that the arab muslims were given trans Jordan and lost all legal claims to the 22% of what you call palestine. At the same time the Jews were given 22% of palestine on condition they gave up all claims to trans Jordan. Why is it that you only think the aspects of international law that supports the arab muslims should be applied, but when the same laws support the Jews you want them to be scrapped or removed from the Jews.


Try doing the full research before you post the islamonazi crap that you rely on for evidence.

 

[Bleipriester]

ForeverYoung436, Freeman, Bleipriester, Daniyel, et al,

Both the pro-Palestinians and pro-Syrians have some erroneous belief that the descriptor of "settlers" is some sort of bad or evil word. It is not. It all "settler" means it someone who "migrated to an area with the intent to established a permanent residence. It has no connotation as to good or evil --- legal or illegal.

It is important to remember, that from the standpoint of the 1949 Armistice, the Syria never pursued a Peace Treaty Arrangement. Technically, while a ceasefire was in place, Israel and Syria were still at War from 1948. In April 1967, Syria broke the ceasefire with a Syrian MiG air battle --- re-opening hostilities.

Prior to the start of the war, attacks conducted against Israel by fledgling Palestinian guerrilla groups based in Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan had increased, leading to costly Israeli reprisals. In November 1966 an Israeli strike on the village of Al-Samūʿ in the Jordanian West Bank left 18 dead and 54 wounded, and, during an air battle with Syria in April 1967, the Israeli Air Force shot down six Syrian MiG fighter jets. In addition, Soviet intelligence reports in May indicated that Israel was planning a campaign against Syria, and, although inaccurate, the information further heightened tensions between Israel and its Arab neighbours.
SOURCE: Six Day War
By The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica

We have to wait for Netanyahu´s response before we can speak of a progress.

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

What's about the settlers of the Golan?

The Golan was annexed by Israel in 1981 (I was there at the time). So the Israelis who live there are citizens of Israel and not settlers.

(COMMENT)

Oddly enough...

On the last two days (June 9–10, 1967) of the Six-Day War, the Israeli armed forces, after defeating Egypt and Jordan, turned their attention to Syria. Under cover of the Israel Air Force, engineer troops built access roads up the steep Golan Heights, which were then frontally assaulted by armoured vehicles and infantry. The Syrian defenders and most of the Arab inhabitants fled, and Syria asked for an armistice; fighting ceased on June 10. The heights were placed under Israeli military administration, and Golan was integrated into the communications and financial framework of Israel. By the late 1970s nearly 30 Jewish settlements had been established on the heights, and in 1981 Israel unilaterally annexed the area.
SOURCE: Golan Heights
By The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica

Egypt and Syria cried like babies for Soviet help as they lost ever more forces. Damascus within range of the IDF and the Egyptian 3d Army 100,000 killed, captured or encircled.

In October 1973, both Syria and Egypt launched a coordinated attack (The Yom Kipper War) Again, this reopened the 1948 War --- breaking the Armistice Arrangements. Both the US and USSR opened emergency supply lines into their respective areas of interest. The USSR was not interested in Peace Talks so long as the Arab had the upper hand in the conflict. And the Arabs gained the initial advantage supported by the 1973 Oil Embargo. But the on the Syrian Front, the IDF eventually recovered from the surprise attack and rolled within artillery range of Damascus. The Soviets were deathly afraid and made a panic gesture -- threatening to open a nuclear conflict if the IDF did not back-off (the current reason for the Israelis to maintain the status quo on the Non-Proliferations Treaty (NPT). The IDF withdrew to the Golan Heights parameter. Similarly, the IDF, surround the Egyptian 3 Army and cutting them off from supplies, the USSR again threatened to open a nuclear conflict if the IDF did attempted to destroy the Egyptian Army.

Important Background:
The little-known US-Soviet confrontation during Yom Kippur War
Global Post 26 October 2012

OCTOBER 06, 1973 : THE YOM KIPPUR WAR BRINGS UNITED STATES AND USSR TO BRINK OF CONFLICT
The History Channel

Most Respectfully,
R

This is not correct. The Settlers occupy other´s soil. While those uncritically siding with Israel claim Israel only defends itself, almost every war resulted in Israel gaining more soil.

 

[Shusha]

This is not correct. The Settlers occupy other´s soil. ...

You say this with no consideration of sovereignty or how sovereignty over soil is transferred. The act of any number of people immigrating to a certain square of soil does not transfer sovereignty, of itself, nor does it meet the legal standards of "occupation". (Just think of large neighborhoods in the US composed of groups of Koreans, Japanese, Italians, Irish, etc.)

It does seem apparent to me that the meaning of the word "settler" has taken on a new connotation due to its association with Jewish people moving to Israel and the territories in dispute. That connotation has certainly taken on a negative meaning.

 

[Bleipriester]

This is not correct. The Settlers occupy other´s soil. ...

You say this with no consideration of sovereignty or how sovereignty over soil is transferred. The act of any number of people immigrating to a certain square of soil does not transfer sovereignty, of itself, nor does it meet the legal standards of "occupation". (Just think of large neighborhoods in the US composed of groups of Koreans, Japanese, Italians, Irish, etc.)

It does seem apparent to me that the meaning of the word "settler" has taken on a new connotation due to its association with Jewish people moving to Israel and the territories in dispute. That connotation has certainly taken on a negative meaning.

You say this as if the law of the jungle applies to the grounds the settlers occupy. But it doesn´t. Your foreign US neighborhoods exist with the agreement of the government.

 

[Shusha]

You say this as if the law of the jungle applies to the grounds the settlers occupy. But it doesn´t. Your foreign US neighborhoods exist with the agreement of the government.

Settlers, immigrants, people just live there. Governments occupy.

 

[Freeman]

This is not correct. The Settlers occupy other´s soil. ...

You say this with no consideration of sovereignty or how sovereignty over soil is transferred. The act of any number of people immigrating to a certain square of soil does not transfer sovereignty, of itself, nor does it meet the legal standards of "occupation". (Just think of large neighborhoods in the US composed of groups of Koreans, Japanese, Italians, Irish, etc.)

It does seem apparent to me that the meaning of the word "settler" has taken on a new connotation due to its association with Jewish people moving to Israel and the territories in dispute. That connotation has certainly taken on a negative meaning.

It's the view of the Apartheid state not international law.

The international law confirm the occupation of Golan.

 

[Phoenall]

ForeverYoung436, Freeman, Bleipriester, Daniyel, et al,

Both the pro-Palestinians and pro-Syrians have some erroneous belief that the descriptor of "settlers" is some sort of bad or evil word. It is not. It all "settler" means it someone who "migrated to an area with the intent to established a permanent residence. It has no connotation as to good or evil --- legal or illegal.

It is important to remember, that from the standpoint of the 1949 Armistice, the Syria never pursued a Peace Treaty Arrangement. Technically, while a ceasefire was in place, Israel and Syria were still at War from 1948. In April 1967, Syria broke the ceasefire with a Syrian MiG air battle --- re-opening hostilities.

Prior to the start of the war, attacks conducted against Israel by fledgling Palestinian guerrilla groups based in Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan had increased, leading to costly Israeli reprisals. In November 1966 an Israeli strike on the village of Al-Samūʿ in the Jordanian West Bank left 18 dead and 54 wounded, and, during an air battle with Syria in April 1967, the Israeli Air Force shot down six Syrian MiG fighter jets. In addition, Soviet intelligence reports in May indicated that Israel was planning a campaign against Syria, and, although inaccurate, the information further heightened tensions between Israel and its Arab neighbours.
SOURCE: Six Day War
By The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica

So you admit that Ass*ad have contacts with zionazis!
Offering the Golan in couterpart of helping end the revolution!

If the terrorists have no place to hide on the borders and get no supplies your "revolution´s" days are numbered.

What's about the settlers of the Golan?

The Golan was annexed by Israel in 1981 (I was there at the time). So the Israelis who live there are citizens of Israel and not settlers.

(COMMENT)

Oddly enough...

On the last two days (June 9–10, 1967) of the Six-Day War, the Israeli armed forces, after defeating Egypt and Jordan, turned their attention to Syria. Under cover of the Israel Air Force, engineer troops built access roads up the steep Golan Heights, which were then frontally assaulted by armoured vehicles and infantry. The Syrian defenders and most of the Arab inhabitants fled, and Syria asked for an armistice; fighting ceased on June 10. The heights were placed under Israeli military administration, and Golan was integrated into the communications and financial framework of Israel. By the late 1970s nearly 30 Jewish settlements had been established on the heights, and in 1981 Israel unilaterally annexed the area.
SOURCE: Golan Heights
By The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica

Egypt and Syria cried like babies for Soviet help as they lost ever more forces. Damascus within range of the IDF and the Egyptian 3d Army 100,000 killed, captured or encircled.

In October 1973, both Syria and Egypt launched a coordinated attack (The Yom Kipper War) Again, this reopened the 1948 War --- breaking the Armistice Arrangements. Both the US and USSR opened emergency supply lines into their respective areas of interest. The USSR was not interested in Peace Talks so long as the Arab had the upper hand in the conflict. And the Arabs gained the initial advantage supported by the 1973 Oil Embargo. But the on the Syrian Front, the IDF eventually recovered from the surprise attack and rolled within artillery range of Damascus. The Soviets were deathly afraid and made a panic gesture -- threatening to open a nuclear conflict if the IDF did not back-off (the current reason for the Israelis to maintain the status quo on the Non-Proliferations Treaty (NPT). The IDF withdrew to the Golan Heights parameter. Similarly, the IDF, surround the Egyptian 3 Army and cutting them off from supplies, the USSR again threatened to open a nuclear conflict if the IDF did attempted to destroy the Egyptian Army.

Important Background:
The little-known US-Soviet confrontation during Yom Kippur War
Global Post 26 October 2012

OCTOBER 06, 1973 : THE YOM KIPPUR WAR BRINGS UNITED STATES AND USSR TO BRINK OF CONFLICT
The History Channel

Most Respectfully,
R

This is not correct. The Settlers occupy other´s soil. While those uncritically siding with Israel claim Israel only defends itself, almost every war resulted in Israel gaining more soil.

SINCE WHEN HAS IT BEEN SYRIAN SOIL ? The international law that set out the borders in 1923 included the golan heights in the land granted to the Jews for their NATIONal home. The arab muslims invaded that land and took it by force. The Jews have just recovered what is theirs by international law



All they have done is recovered that soil stolen from them by islamonazi invasion and attack, dont like it take it to the ICC/ICJ who will rule on international law and then evict the arab muslims from the lands they have stolen.

OR ARE YOU ANOTHER MORON THAT DOES NOT THINK INTERNATIONAL LAW SHOULD EVER BE IN PLACE WHEN IT SUPPORTS THE JEWS AND GIVES THEM PROTECTION ?

 

[Phoenall]

This is not correct. The Settlers occupy other´s soil. ...

You say this with no consideration of sovereignty or how sovereignty over soil is transferred. The act of any number of people immigrating to a certain square of soil does not transfer sovereignty, of itself, nor does it meet the legal standards of "occupation". (Just think of large neighborhoods in the US composed of groups of Koreans, Japanese, Italians, Irish, etc.)

It does seem apparent to me that the meaning of the word "settler" has taken on a new connotation due to its association with Jewish people moving to Israel and the territories in dispute. That connotation has certainly taken on a negative meaning.

You say this as if the law of the jungle applies to the grounds the settlers occupy. But it doesn´t. Your foreign US neighborhoods exist with the agreement of the government.

And the Jewish neighbourhoods exist with the full weight of international law supporting and defending them. Or do you believe that international law should only work in islams favour ?

 

[Phoenall]

This is not correct. The Settlers occupy other´s soil. ...

You say this with no consideration of sovereignty or how sovereignty over soil is transferred. The act of any number of people immigrating to a certain square of soil does not transfer sovereignty, of itself, nor does it meet the legal standards of "occupation". (Just think of large neighborhoods in the US composed of groups of Koreans, Japanese, Italians, Irish, etc.)

It does seem apparent to me that the meaning of the word "settler" has taken on a new connotation due to its association with Jewish people moving to Israel and the territories in dispute. That connotation has certainly taken on a negative meaning.

It's the view of the Apartheid state not international law.

The international law confirm the occupation of Golan.

How about a link proving this fantasy aparthied state exists. Remember the action deemed aparthied has to take place inside state borders, be government policy towards a group that puts them at a disadvantge and stops them from being full citizens. If it happens in occupied territories then it is covered by International law and the Geneva conventions as legal no aparthied law control measures.

What international law is that then, who enacted it and when was it brought into existence. A hint UN resolutions are not international laws, and international laws apply to every nation. No international law singles out any one nation, state, group or religion for special treatment.


LOSER LOSES AGAIN BECAUSE OF HIS INABILITY TO UNDERSTAND SIMPLE CONCEPTS IN REGARDS TO INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND HOPES THAT NO ONE WILL REALISE HE IS ONCE AGAIN LYING

 

[RoccoR]

Bleipriester, et al,

This is not a real estate deal. The right of self-defense is not a point which can be debated. If attacked, you may defend.

This is not correct. The Settlers occupy other´s soil. While those uncritically siding with Israel claim Israel only defends itself, almost every war resulted in Israel gaining more soil.

(COMMENT)

Prior to 1988, there was nothing that was considered the State of Palestine.

Settlers (post-1967 War, were all in Area "C" which Israel has full jurisdiction.

The Hostile Arab Palestinians were NOT a State which consented to be bound by the Treaty of Lausanne and for which the treaty may be enforced upon. There was no "STATE" of Palestine as a signatory, there was no specific people or territory identified as Palestine or Palestinian.

ARTICLE 16.

Turkey hereby renounces all rights and title whatsoever over or respecting the territories situated outside the frontiers laid down in the present Treaty and the islands other than those over which her sovereignty is recognised by the said Treaty, the future of these territories and islands being settled or to be settled by the parties concerned.

The provisions of the present Article do not prejudice any special arrangements arising from neighbourly relations which have been or may be concluded between Turkey and any limitrophe countries.
​

The Peace Treaties between Israel and the Arab League States of Egypt and Jordan resolved the international boundaries issues.

Acts of aggression by Arab League States, in which the Arab League States lost territory, is not an acquisition by force. It is an abandonment for which Israel established effective control.

Most Respectfully,
R