Eric Arthur Blair
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2015
- 25,955
- 15,957
- 1,415
If the wild fires we see in California and Oregon (and I guess Washington though there doesn't seem to be many out breaks there) are the result of global warming why is it that only in the three Western states run by leftists do we see such out of control burning over such wide swathes?
Is global warming not applicable in Idaho? Canada? Nevada? Montana? Colorado? Utah? In Wyoming? In Arizona? In ANY highly wooded state in America? In Vermont? New York? Minnesota?
Because we don't see these wild out of control blazes anywhere but California, Oregon and, perhaps, Washington.
And then there is a virtual fire wall? And outside of those state borders, which are invented imaginary things, we see none of the terrifying effects of global warming?
So why not Chris Wallace? Why not Susan Page? Why not leftist global warming theorists? Maybe I just don't understand the concept of GLOBAL warming. I thought global warming meant everywhere on the whole planet.
Not just in states on the West Coast run by leftist governors.
Is global warming not applicable in Idaho? Canada? Nevada? Montana? Colorado? Utah? In Wyoming? In Arizona? In ANY highly wooded state in America? In Vermont? New York? Minnesota?
Because we don't see these wild out of control blazes anywhere but California, Oregon and, perhaps, Washington.
And then there is a virtual fire wall? And outside of those state borders, which are invented imaginary things, we see none of the terrifying effects of global warming?
So why not Chris Wallace? Why not Susan Page? Why not leftist global warming theorists? Maybe I just don't understand the concept of GLOBAL warming. I thought global warming meant everywhere on the whole planet.
Not just in states on the West Coast run by leftist governors.
Last edited: