bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,368
- 2,180
I just explained to you how it works, but you're a dumbass.That is false. They cannot claim ownership of the sidewalk.
The city doesn't own their sidewalk, moron
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just explained to you how it works, but you're a dumbass.That is false. They cannot claim ownership of the sidewalk.
trespassing is threatening them.No, they have to threaten him before he pulls out a fire arm.
![]()
He wasn't unlawfully using a weapon.I already did.
571.030. Unlawful use of weapons, offense of — exceptions — violation, penalties. — 1. A person commits the offense of unlawful use of weapons, except as otherwise provided by sections 571.101 to 571.121, if he or she knowingly:
(4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; or
The other neighbors were not skeered of black people like the McCoskys are so they didn’t have to brandish their guns on the front lawn.They obviously were threatening the McCloskys, and everyone else in that community, for that matter.
Nope. It’s not theirs. They have use of it, but that’s absolutely NOT ownership.Sure they can. The city sure doesn't own it.
It’s a rational judgment call. You can’t declare people imminent threats without a rational reason. They had none.And THERE IT IS!!!
I KNEW you fools would make your partisan judgment call and YOU DID IT!!!
What if he is just sitting on his porch, cleaning his firearm LONG BEFORE they show up.No, they have to threaten him before he pulls out a fire arm.
![]()
And the shot no one, so fuck you.It’s a rational judgment call. You can’t declare people imminent threats without a rational reason. They had none.
Sorry bout that,Who needs to wonder? It was because trumptards were threatening vigilante justice.
You don’t get to point guns at people without a rational reason either.And the shot no one, so fuck you.
There was no group of people trying to break down a police barricade trying to get on his property. And I don’t think he had Mike Pence inside and a joint session of Congress taking place at his house when a group of black people were walking by on his here way to someplace else.McClosky didn't shoot anyone, did he?
NFBW: You are desperate as Faun says because now you have to dig down into your racist soul when you admit that if black people walk down a street lined by homes of the wealthy they necessarily have to be violent home invaders.. Keep going you racist pig. END2208291409No body set foot on their property because they used the lawful threat of deadly force which deterred would-be violent home invaders who were part of a group known to be violent.
Violent mob (BLM is violent as Faun admitted) = rational reason.You don’t get to point guns at people without a rational reason either.
Race card.NFBW: You are desperate as Faun says because now you have to dig down into your racist soul when you admit that if black people walk down a street lined by homes of the wealthy they necessarily have to be violent home invaders.. Keep going you racist pig. END2208291409
Can you specify what violence the mob engaged in? To be rational, it has to be articulable.Violent mob (BLM is violent as Faun admitted) = rational reason.
I quote you making a racist statement. Black people walking down your street or jogging are not violent invaders, or burglars just because they are black. Are you familiar with the Ahmad Arberry murder where three white racists made a similar assumption, murdered a black kid, and now rot in prison initially for brandishing their firearms. You best watch yourself if you like to brandish your guns in public.Race card.
You obviously don't know the concept of analogy or using differing scenarios to illustrate principles.I quote you making a racist statement. Black people walking down your street or jogging are not violent invaders, or burglars just because they are black. Are you familiar with the Ahmad Arberry murder where three white racists made a similar assumption, murdered a black kid, and now rot in prison initially for brandishing their firearms. You best watch yourself if you like to brandish your guns in public.
oh no, motherfucker. We have been told repeatedly that a mob that is violent justifies shooting one member of that mob.Can you specify what violence the mob engaged in? To be rational, it has to be articulable.
Where is the messages that enables you say truthfully Faun admitted BLM is violent.(BLM is violent as Faun admitted)
I noticed you couldn’t articulate what violence the mob had engaged in. This is a huge problem for your argument which is why you are going to try to ignore it.oh no, motherfucker. We have been told repeatedly that a mob that is violent justifies shooting one member of that mob.
But to answer your question, go back and look at the law I posted.
A person has the right to use deadly force (not just the threat of deadly force but actual deadly force) to stop someone from entering their property.
The McCloskey's were justified.