Ashlii Babbitt Thread

[whutTHEYsay]

But don't expect us to bow and curtsey to your extortionists, vote changers, boxes of illegal votes,

NFBW: You can’t bow now white cow - you are already bowing to the Orange Jesus and his BIG LIE that he won the 2020 presidential election.

You missed your chance to support Trump’s BIG LIE when you didn’t have big balls like Ashli Babbitt did who did storm the Capitol for Q-Anon and Trump on January 6.

Poor dumb bitch thought you were there and 3 million more of you duped fools had her back.

“We are walking to the Capitol in a mob. There’s an estimated over three million people here today,” “There is a sea of nothing but red, white and blue patriots for Trump,” “God bless America, patriots.” Babbitt-21JAN06-mob​

​

“Nothing will stop us….they can try and try and try but the storm is here and it is descending upon DC in less than 24 hours….dark to light!” Babbitt-21JAN05​

​

Had you been there beautress Ashli Babbit might have stopped the steal and she’d be alive right now and Orange Jesus back on the Q throne in the newly name Q House .

Ashli could be Secretary of Defense and you could be on the Supreme Court if you went to DC with three million more and made Ashli’s sea of nothing but red, white and blue patriots for Trump a Q-dream come true.

But no, you are a coward heaping praise on Babbitt from your cowardly keyboard too much of a coward to do what Trump asked you to do when it counted.

Why weren’t you in that sea of nothing but red, white and blue patriots for Trump with Ashli putting your life on the line beside her instead of letting Orange Jesus and the Oath Keepers down. Why are you still posting, you Q coward?

 

[Lesh]

NFBW: You can’t bow now white cow - you are already bowing to the Orange Jesus and his BIG LIE that he won the 2020 presidential election.

You missed your chance to support Trump’s BIG LIE when you didn’t have big balls like Ashli Babbitt did who did storm the Capitol for Q-Anon and Trump on January 6.

Poor dumb bitch thought you were there and 3 million more of you duped fools had her back.

“We are walking to the Capitol in a mob. There’s an estimated over three million people here today,” “There is a sea of nothing but red, white and blue patriots for Trump,” “God bless America, patriots.” Babbitt-21JAN06-mob​

​

“Nothing will stop us….they can try and try and try but the storm is here and it is descending upon DC in less than 24 hours….dark to light!” Babbitt-21JAN05​

​

Had you been there beautress Ashli Babbit might have stopped the steal and she’d be alive right now and Orange Jesus back on the Q throne in the newly name Q House .

Ashli could be Secretary of Defense and you could be on the Supreme Court if you went to DC with three million more and made Ashli’s sea of nothing but red, white and blue patriots for Trump a Q-dream come true.

But no, you are a coward heaping praise on Babbitt from your cowardly keyboard too much of a coward to do what Trump asked you to do when it counted.

Why weren’t you in that sea of nothing but red, white and blue patriots for Trump with Ashli putting your life on the line beside her instead of letting Orange Jesus and the Oath Keepers down. Why are you still posting, you Q coward?

I take your point but one more fat white entitled senior citizen would not have made a difference

 

[AceRothstein]

Isn't she the one who caught a hot load on her throat?

 

[whutTHEYsay]

I take your point but one more fat white entitled senior citizen would not have made a difference

Trump thought he had more than a million outside his window on Jan6 . He wanted to March to the Capitol with them - who knows what his Secret Service Detail would have let him do

They would never overturn the election / but if 3 million MAGA keyboard warriors booked flights or drive into DC on January 5 the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys Probably would have open carried AR15s surrounded by such a huge mob camping on the Mall .

I think part of the plan if Mike Pence pussied out was to have racially tinged violence breakout that day in DC and then around the rest of the country with the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys no longer just standing by.

Trump wrongly thought he could invoke the insurrection act but being wrong never stopped him before.

Anyway with three Million angry MAGA hats and Q JESUS CONFEDERATE TRUMP flags a flyin on the MALL The Joint Session of Congress does not take place in the Capitol or DC.

They move it to the NAVAL ACADEMY IN ANNAPOLIS or if necessary to Camp David

And Then MAGA world gets all fired up that it’s all unconstitutional because it’s not in the Capitol and or some shit like that

We will never know because fat old MAGA lady beautress didn’t love Trump and believe his Big Lie enough to follow his order and be there. All hat and no cattle that one.

 

[Lesh]

Isn't she the one who caught a hot load on her throat?

She is...yes

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

No one in that mob appeared dangerous.

See, you have made an arm-chair judgment call on what constitutes a "dangerous mob" and that's the basis for your conclusion that the two situations are not the same. It's because you love BLM and hate the "trumpsters." That is the REAL basis of your arguments.

That pretty much sums up this entire discussion.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

See, you have made an arm-chair judgment call on what constitutes a "dangerous mob" and that's the basis for your conclusion that the two situations are not the same.

The two situations are not the same. At the Capitol Every single federal government lawmaker and the Vice President was surrounded by a mob that was attacking them and beating and overpowering the security forces whose duty it was to protect them. AND Trump was sitting by and watching in a lunch room on Fox News doing nothing to stop the attackers for three hours. then issues a tweet to go home and he loves them.

You compare that to two Trump schmucks illegally brandishing firearms like the proverbial old man yelling “get off my grass” but at Black People walking past their house on a public street.

You are promoting this absurdity because you cannot defend Ashli Babbitt’s use of violence to undermine American Democracy as no reason for her being shot and killed by a police officer whose duty it was to defend our democracy.

I collect MAGA absurdities and yours Bootney Lee Farnsworth is a good one.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The two situations are not the same. At the Capitol Every single federal government lawmaker and the Vice President was surrounded by a mob that was attacking them and beating and overpowering the security forces whose duty it was to protect them. AND Trump was sitting by and watching in a lunch room on Fox News doing nothing to stop the attackers for three hours. then issues a tweet to go home and he loves them.

You compare that to two Trump schmucks illegally brandishing firearms like the proverbial old man yelling “get off my grass” but at Black People walking past their house on a public street.

You are promoting this absurdity because you cannot defend Ashli Babbitt’s use of violence to undermine American Democracy as no reason for her being shot and killed by a police officer whose duty it was to defend our democracy.

I collect MAGA absurdities and yours Bootney Lee Farnsworth is a good one.

Quote the law they you think the McCloskeys violated. The facts do not line up with the allegations at all.

The threat of deadly force to protect ones home is legal in Missouri.

Again, you see the two situations as different because you are a non-thinking partisan hack.

End of Discussion.

 

[Aldo Raine]

LOLOL

Did you really think you could lie your way out of this??

1. It wasn't murder. 3 independent investigations all agreed it was a justifiable shot.
2. She was ignoring lawful police orders to get back and breaching a police barricade separating a violent mob from members of Congress.
3. She was a traitor sho was attacking her own government. Liberals want traitors shot or incarcerated.

I would prefer not shot, but yes I do understand what happened and why.

 

[Delldude]

----------------------------------------------
Ah, let's not get wrapped up in our ******-tighties over semantics. "Terrorists" "Insurrection"......blah, blah, blah.

Who does it matter to (other than the perp)....if he is locked up 20 years for 'Sedition" vs. 10yrs for "Insurrection"?

Makes no difference to me.
As long as these jackasses get put away for a bit of a good spell. We -- and America --- will be better for it.

Speaking of 'being put away'.....well, did you see this in tonight's newsfeeds?
-------------------------------------------------------------
“We stormed the capitol, it’s insane.”
So proclaimed John Strand in a text after entering the halls of Congress last Jan. 6. The message was part of a seemingly endless procession of evidence — including photos, videos, tweets, texts, and more — documenting Strand’s role in the riot that was displayed before a jury at the D.C. District Court in Washington last week. Strand was convicted on all five charges he faced on Tuesday, and now faces up to 24 years in prison.

Strand’s potential sentence is so harsh because he refused to take a plea deal, instead opting to fight the charges against him before a jury and through an absurd online campaign for vindication. Strand, a model-turned-Covid-19 conspiracy theorist, posts regularly on his social media channels about how he’s being persecuted and set up a website splashed with glamour shots and links to donate. “FROM GUCCI TO GUILTY,” reads a banner on the site.
--------------------------------------------

Maybe this pretty boy will be assigned to Shawshank's laundry the way Andy Dufresne was? Might be fun.

Rationalize it all day long, Good Poster Chillicothe, but at the end of the day not one person was charged for terrorism.

 

[Delldude]

NFBW: I do.

A person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims:​

The assault on the Capitol was unlawful violence against every civilian who voted for Biden the winner.

William Todd Wilson using violence in pursuit of political aims by that definition is a terrorist. Just like I said.

END2209282348

Until there are people charged in a court of law, your opinion is just like an asshole, everybody has one.

 

[Delldude]

LOLOL

Did you really think you could lie your way out of this??

1. It wasn't murder. 3 independent investigations all agreed it was a justifiable shot.
2. She was ignoring lawful police orders to get back and breaching a police barricade separating a violent mob from members of Congress.
3. She was a traitor sho was attacking her own government. Liberals want traitors shot or incarcerated.

Unarmed traitor with about 2-4 capitol police ten feet behind her with semi-automatic rifles.

 

[Marener]

See, you have made an arm-chair judgment call on what constitutes a "dangerous mob" and that's the basis for your conclusion that the two situations are not the same. It's because you love BLM and hate the "trumpsters." That is the REAL basis of your arguments.

That pretty much sums up this entire discussion.

Yes. We have to make a judgement about whether the mob was dangerous.

People in this country don’t get to point guns at people because they decide someone is dangerous. That sort of judgement is always up for questioning by the judicial system.

 

[Faun]

See, you have made an arm-chair judgment call on what constitutes a "dangerous mob" and that's the basis for your conclusion that the two situations are not the same. It's because you love BLM and hate the "trumpsters." That is the REAL basis of your arguments.

That pretty much sums up this entire discussion.

No, it's because they were simply walking down the street. They were neither violent nor threatening. Unlike Trump's thugs who were both.

 

[Delldude]

In the Guy Reffitt case, the prosecution wanted a terrorism enhancement, but the judge shot it down because it would create sentencing disparity with other capitol defendants.

That and based upon evidence it would have created another burden for the prosecution.

 

[Faun]

Quote the law they you think the McCloskeys violated. The facts do not line up with the allegations at all.

The threat of deadly force to protect ones home is legal in Missouri.

Again, you see the two situations as different because you are a non-thinking partisan hack.

End of Discussion.

571.030. Unlawful use of weapons, offense of — exceptions — violation, penalties. — 1. A person commits the offense of unlawful use of weapons, except as otherwise provided by sections 571.101 to 571.121, if he or she knowingly:

(4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; or

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Until there are people charged in a court of law,

…. you say cannot be described as terrorists. Why not? If the dictionary says a terrorist is one who uses unlawful violence against civilians to achieve a political goal, and many of the January 6 attackers used violence to achieve a political goal, I want authority 30 do you get to deny me the right to use words in the dictionary that fit the description of what is terrorists did?

Who the fuck do you think you are? Banning the dictionary in a discussion?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

No, it's because they were simply walking down the street. They were neither violent nor threatening. Unlike Trump's thugs who were both.

Bullshit.

You love one group and hate the other. That is the ONLY reason why you see the two as different.

It is pure partisan bullshit and you know it. Or maybe you don't know it. I don't know. Don't really care.

 

[Faun]

Unarmed traitor with about 2-4 capitol police ten feet behind her with semi-automatic rifles.

Who were just escorting police down the stairs when she was shot.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

571.030. Unlawful use of weapons, offense of — exceptions — violation, penalties. — 1. A person commits the offense of unlawful use of weapons, except as otherwise provided by sections 571.101 to 571.121, if he or she knowingly:

(4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; or

563.011

Chapter definitions.

revisor.mo.gov

563.031

Use of force in defense of persons.

revisor.mo.gov

I don't need to say anything else to your dumb ass.

End of discussion.