Gays represent .00000000000000000001 of the population but somehow they are some kind of threat.
So, answer the question. If the nation becoming gayer, america becoming "Better" and if so, please explain your reasoning.
Why does it have to be "better" as a result? Do you think it's "worse" that people are more comfortable being their true selves and more are coming out?
I think that ALL liberal complaints about such issues are false. That they only use such issues as weapons, when they are useful and don't really care about them. The way that feminists rallied around Bill Clinton, sexual harasser professional, is the archetypal example.
And as the "gaying" has been a part of that, yes, I certainly do think it is a bad thing, having been part of the division that is killing this country.
Do you have personal opinion on the OP question?
People being gay are "part of the division that is
killing this country"?

Come on, do you even hear yourself?
Yes, I have a personal opinion about the OP. I think he's a racist piece of shit. You like him though don't you?
1. The way the gay activists advanced their agenda is part of the division.
2. I asked you your opinion on the op question. It is a valid question. The way you answered a question I did not ask? That is you admitting that you know the change is for the worse.
1.

Ah, I see...fighting for rights causes “division”. You don’t see the people fighting against equal rights as divisive, just the people seeking them.
2. Since the OP is a serious racist piece of shit, his opening post has zero credibility.
1. I was clearly referencing their methods, not their goals. Try again.
2. It is taboo to admit that the change is a change for the worse. YOu know it is. I know it is. That you called the op wacist, is irrelevant to that.
1. What “method” do you object to? What “method” should people employ to fight for equality?
2. Well, I don’t believe that diversity makes us “worse”. The OP is a straight up racist. That’s all that needs be
1. The bit where they pretended that "marriage" was always about any random two people getting married. That turned anyone who did not immediately concede to their demands, into a "bigot" and a "phobe". That was divisive and unfair and made them part of the problem.
2. Interesting. Nothing in the op or my repeating of the question, limited it to "diversity" so, that was a dodge on your part.
I understand. We all know that the change is for the worse but it is taboo to say it. You, being a liberal, have a lot of self image invested in conforming with such.... dogma.
Saying "wacist", sorry, that does not make the case that teh change is for the good.