Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
You still pretending it could be anything else?
You can’t murder a non-person.
Semantics doesn’t alter morality. You might not want to admit it to yourself, but you know this is true.
It’s not semantics. No minimaly functioning nueral development, no person.
Thats the fact of matter you can word whichever way you want to.
Yep.....they aren't a person till magically they exit a vagina....then all of the sudden a light shines down from Heaven and God grants them a soul. You see God can't see babies in the womb.You still pretending it could be anything else?
You can’t murder a non-person.
And if you ever called my unborn kid or anyone's unborn kid a non-person to my face I would bust you up.
You see I believe women should have options.....but I personally won't participate in the murder of a child.
![]()
Take your little heavens and gods and shove it up your ass, no way is there any person without any upper brain function to speak of.
There is no non-theological, non-stupid reason to treat developing fetus before third trimester as anything but 100% property of the mother, so why don't you just keep your little grabby hands out of it..
YOU are the last person who wants to equate "personhood" with neural development, Chuckles.
wtf? Are you SERIOUSLY making an argument that I don't have the nueral capacity for a personhood?
Are you really that fucking stupid?
No, but you are. That you didn't understand that validates my estimate of your neural capacity.