Article I. Section 5.

[$ecular#eckler]

This section is what leads to the political chaos. The concepts described should be secured with definite details that are enforced by the judiciary, and any lawyer should be able to recognize the tremendous inadequacies here. Let's go through it.​

1. Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.
2. Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.
3. Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.
4. Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

Interpretation: Article I, Section 5 | The National Constitution Center

constitutioncenter.org

 

[$ecular#eckler]

Subsection 1. Actually suggests that there should be a judiciary regulating the legislatures!
Subsection 2. Allows them to make their own rules!
Subsection 3. Allows them to keep their journal and censor it!
Subsection 4. Allows them to do what ever when ever!

 

[$ecular#eckler]

A month, now; and nobody can formulate a retort.

Damn, I'm good - brilliant, absolutely, brilliant.