Arrest the judge
- Thread starter EvilCat Breath
- Start date
Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,511
- 2,250
You are so stupid!
How do you know what to believe? Enlighten me.
Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,511
- 2,250
Your fact has been debunked already.
Try reading the news once in a while.
True. The FBI likely has a team assigned to reviewing the classified data most likely to determine if the contents would support certain charges. With only two or three hundred documents, 2 weeks seems ample time. Most of rest of the information would be presidential documents which they would have little interest in other than noting destruction and damage. So yes they have probably gone through everything but they will need to go back through documents when the prosecutor is drafting charges.
The DOJ also has another source of information, the Intelligence community. They know which classified documents were recovered. and they are reviewing them to determine potential damage and actions to be taken. I'm sure they will be passing information to the DOJ.
Last edited:
kyzr
Diamond Member
Another low-IQ post from a low-IQ democrat.
I posted a link from a Harvard Law Professor explaining the LAW, and you prove how stupid you are.
Maybe you should post in the rubber room, or the flame zone? Its more your level.
kyzr
Diamond Member
Yeah, but what happens when the search warrant is ruled illegal, and the "evidence" collected illegally is thrown out?
All FBI agents are required to have top secret clearance. Some are cleared for SCI documents.
No, they're not.
BULL FUCKING SHIT!!!!!
Obama's 30 Million Document Closet Swings Open - They Raided Trump but Never Considered Raiding Barry
Rules for thee, but not for me.
patriotjournal.org
What’s Happening:
Democrats are defending the unprecedented raid on Trump’s home. They claim the 45th president “violated” the law by taking documents with him from the White House.They neglect the fact that Trump had been cooperating with the government. They even advised him on adding locks to his storeroom.
And now, people are asking why they didn’t do this to Obama—even though he took millions of documents with him.
From New York Post:
Oh, how interesting!
Barack Obama took with him 30 million pages of documents with him when he left office. Historians were “outraged” over this move.
Yet Obama claimed he was allowed to, citing the very law Democrats are saying Trump broke.
Obama promised he’d “digitize” all these files and make them available to the National Archives.
Yet it’s been over five years since he left office and not one of those files is available online.
Despite all this, the FBI did not think it was necessary to raid Obama’s home or office.
So, let’s stop pretending this is really about classified documents.
This raid came just days before Trump was set to testify before New York’s AG. And this raid coincided with rumors that Trump would announce his 2024 plans by the end of the Summer.
The raid also comes as Americans prepare for a big election season, one in which Trump has been endorsing numerous candidates.
Hmm… do you think this raid has to do with a few boxes of documents, or as a means of framing Trump in some way?
We can’t say for certain—but the fact Obama was allowed to take 30 million pages with him speaks volumes.
Key Takeaways:
- Obama took 30 million pages of documents from the White House.
- His office has yet to digitize them, despite promises to the National Archives.
- The FBI never investigated Obama nor raided his home or office.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
Then get on the blower with your state representative and tell them you want a flat tax!
lantern2814
Diamond Member
- Jul 17, 2018
- 15,389
- 12,591
- 2,290
Fuck off ignoramus. Truth hurt your pea brain? Fully appropriate as she has jurisdiction in that area. Cry harder.Give me a fucking break! That changes nothing! She did what she did and it was inappropriate
'Biased And Corrupt' Trump Judge Defied Law In Assigning Special Master: Expert
"Trump judges do not believe in the rule of law," Elie Mystal said as the ex-president won a minor victory amid the probe into the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.www.huffpost.com
Now you can go slink off but you are too stupid to feel shame
kyzr
Diamond Member
You brought your "A" game today!!BULL FUCKING SHIT!!!!!
Obama's 30 Million Document Closet Swings Open - They Raided Trump but Never Considered Raiding Barry
Rules for thee, but not for me.
What’s Happening:
Democrats are defending the unprecedented raid on Trump’s home. They claim the 45th president “violated” the law by taking documents with him from the White House.
They neglect the fact that Trump had been cooperating with the government. They even advised him on adding locks to his storeroom.
And now, people are asking why they didn’t do this to Obama—even though he took millions of documents with him.
From New York Post:
Oh, how interesting!
Barack Obama took with him 30 million pages of documents with him when he left office. Historians were “outraged” over this move.
Yet Obama claimed he was allowed to, citing the very law Democrats are saying Trump broke.
Obama promised he’d “digitize” all these files and make them available to the National Archives.
Yet it’s been over five years since he left office and not one of those files is available online.
Despite all this, the FBI did not think it was necessary to raid Obama’s home or office.
So, let’s stop pretending this is really about classified documents.
This raid came just days before Trump was set to testify before New York’s AG. And this raid coincided with rumors that Trump would announce his 2024 plans by the end of the Summer.
The raid also comes as Americans prepare for a big election season, one in which Trump has been endorsing numerous candidates.
Hmm… do you think this raid has to do with a few boxes of documents, or as a means of framing Trump in some way?
We can’t say for certain—but the fact Obama was allowed to take 30 million pages with him speaks volumes.
Key Takeaways:
- Obama took 30 million pages of documents from the White House.
- His office has yet to digitize them, despite promises to the National Archives.
- The FBI never investigated Obama nor raided his home or office.
lantern2814
Diamond Member
- Jul 17, 2018
- 15,389
- 12,591
- 2,290
Your proof seems to be missing asshole.
Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 46,840
- 20,379
- 2,173
You believe Obama took the documents because you read it on the internet?BULL FUCKING SHIT!!!!!
Obama's 30 Million Document Closet Swings Open - They Raided Trump but Never Considered Raiding Barry
Rules for thee, but not for me.
What’s Happening:
Democrats are defending the unprecedented raid on Trump’s home. They claim the 45th president “violated” the law by taking documents with him from the White House.
They neglect the fact that Trump had been cooperating with the government. They even advised him on adding locks to his storeroom.
And now, people are asking why they didn’t do this to Obama—even though he took millions of documents with him.
From New York Post:
Oh, how interesting!
Barack Obama took with him 30 million pages of documents with him when he left office. Historians were “outraged” over this move.
Yet Obama claimed he was allowed to, citing the very law Democrats are saying Trump broke.
Obama promised he’d “digitize” all these files and make them available to the National Archives.
Yet it’s been over five years since he left office and not one of those files is available online.
Despite all this, the FBI did not think it was necessary to raid Obama’s home or office.
So, let’s stop pretending this is really about classified documents.
This raid came just days before Trump was set to testify before New York’s AG. And this raid coincided with rumors that Trump would announce his 2024 plans by the end of the Summer.
The raid also comes as Americans prepare for a big election season, one in which Trump has been endorsing numerous candidates.
Hmm… do you think this raid has to do with a few boxes of documents, or as a means of framing Trump in some way?
We can’t say for certain—but the fact Obama was allowed to take 30 million pages with him speaks volumes.
Key Takeaways:
- Obama took 30 million pages of documents from the White House.
- His office has yet to digitize them, despite promises to the National Archives.
- The FBI never investigated Obama nor raided his home or office.
Do they even have a source for that outlandish claim?
lantern2814
Diamond Member
- Jul 17, 2018
- 15,389
- 12,591
- 2,290
And yet still no proof of any of your claims dumbfuck. You’re going to do a lot of crying when this doesn’t go how you want it to. Again.
Federal Search warrants are very rarely thrown out. And this one won't be since the AG was involved. There will almost certainly be a pretrial hearing in which the defense will attempt to block as many documents as possible. The primary reason items are disallowed is that the recovery was outside the bounds of the warrant. However the bounds of this warrant is very wide.
Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 46,840
- 20,379
- 2,173
Says who?
Reading your posts, it's not surprising that you would want to see a nuclear war.
It should be thrown out because if you read the US codes it was an illegal search warrant.
Search Warrant Requirements
Key Fact
A judge or magistrate will issue a search warrant only if an affidavit establishes probable cause,
and the search warrant is sufficiently limited in scope.
The Fourth Amendment itself identifies the criteria for obtaining a lawful search warrant. A police officer, or other official seeking a warrant, must establish probable cause to the satisfaction of a judge, must make an “[o]ath or affirmation” as to the truth of the matters supporting probable cause, and must “particularly describ[e] the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” A search warrant is invalid if it covers too broad an area or does not identify specific items or persons.
The Search Warrant Requirement in Criminal Investigations & Legal Exceptions
What types of searches and seizures are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, and when may exceptions to the warrant requirement apply?
www.justia.com
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Kristi Noem Revoke's Harvard's Right to Issue Visas to Foreign "Students"- Started by Edgetho
- Replies: 0
-
Supreme Court grants Trump request to fire independent agency members but says Federal Reserve is different- Started by EvilEyeFleegle
- Replies: 0
-
Homeland Security revokes Harvard’s ability to enroll international students- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 1
-
Woman tried to burn a tick off a dog. Instead, it lit a fire that caused $400K in damage, suit says
- Started by EvilEyeFleegle
- Replies: 3
-
