Armed Church employee saves woman's life, doesn't fire a shot...

Well, that is unless he clocked the guy and got the knife away. You don't need a gun, in a church no less, for that.


Really, do you know the first thing about knives and how deadly they are in the hands of even an inexperienced person........no, you obviously don't.

The gun was the factor that outwieghed the guys knife.....
The guy might have saved her life, the gun didn't. It was certainly efficient in this case, since the SOB ran away, for good reason as guns can kill you, but hardly necessary. And I notice you didn't mention that she should have been armed? Why, because he probably would have used the gun on her instead of the knife...


If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
 
Well, that is unless he clocked the guy and got the knife away. You don't need a gun, in a church no less, for that.


Really, do you know the first thing about knives and how deadly they are in the hands of even an inexperienced person........no, you obviously don't.

The gun was the factor that outwieghed the guys knife.....
The guy might have saved her life, the gun didn't. It was certainly efficient in this case, since the SOB ran away, for good reason as guns can kill you, but hardly necessary. And I notice you didn't mention that she should have been armed? Why, because he probably would have used the gun on her instead of the knife...


If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
Guns don't defend, they kill. For all you know the guy would have run off regardless.
 
Well, that is unless he clocked the guy and got the knife away. You don't need a gun, in a church no less, for that.


Really, do you know the first thing about knives and how deadly they are in the hands of even an inexperienced person........no, you obviously don't.

The gun was the factor that outwieghed the guys knife.....
The guy might have saved her life, the gun didn't. It was certainly efficient in this case, since the SOB ran away, for good reason as guns can kill you, but hardly necessary. And I notice you didn't mention that she should have been armed? Why, because he probably would have used the gun on her instead of the knife...


If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
Guns don't defend, they kill. For all you know the guy would have run off regardless.
Guns don't defend? Are you trying to be an ass?
 
Well, that is unless he clocked the guy and got the knife away. You don't need a gun, in a church no less, for that.


Really, do you know the first thing about knives and how deadly they are in the hands of even an inexperienced person........no, you obviously don't.

The gun was the factor that outwieghed the guys knife.....
The guy might have saved her life, the gun didn't. It was certainly efficient in this case, since the SOB ran away, for good reason as guns can kill you, but hardly necessary. And I notice you didn't mention that she should have been armed? Why, because he probably would have used the gun on her instead of the knife...


If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
Guns don't defend, they kill. For all you know the guy would have run off regardless.
Guns don't defend? Are you trying to be an ass?
Guns are only for killing. If you can kill him before you get killed, you win.
 
Really, do you know the first thing about knives and how deadly they are in the hands of even an inexperienced person........no, you obviously don't.

The gun was the factor that outwieghed the guys knife.....
The guy might have saved her life, the gun didn't. It was certainly efficient in this case, since the SOB ran away, for good reason as guns can kill you, but hardly necessary. And I notice you didn't mention that she should have been armed? Why, because he probably would have used the gun on her instead of the knife...


If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
Guns don't defend, they kill. For all you know the guy would have run off regardless.
Guns don't defend? Are you trying to be an ass?
Guns are only for killing. If you can kill him before you get killed, you win.
Killing can be in defense of life. So you're really going to float that moronic argument?
 
The guy might have saved her life, the gun didn't. It was certainly efficient in this case, since the SOB ran away, for good reason as guns can kill you, but hardly necessary. And I notice you didn't mention that she should have been armed? Why, because he probably would have used the gun on her instead of the knife...


If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
Guns don't defend, they kill. For all you know the guy would have run off regardless.
Guns don't defend? Are you trying to be an ass?
Guns are only for killing. If you can kill him before you get killed, you win.
Killing can be in defense of life. So you're really going to float that moronic argument?
Can gun stop a bullet? If it can't then it's not defensive. We don't give guns to soldiers to defend themselves, we give them to them to kill the enemy. We might call it defending themselves, but that's not at all what it is.

Guns are for killing, period. If they weren't then you wouldn't want radical Muslims not to have them...
 
If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
Guns don't defend, they kill. For all you know the guy would have run off regardless.
Guns don't defend? Are you trying to be an ass?
Guns are only for killing. If you can kill him before you get killed, you win.
Killing can be in defense of life. So you're really going to float that moronic argument?
Can gun stop a bullet? If it can't then it's not defensive. We don't give guns to soldiers to defend themselves, we give them to them to kill the enemy. We might call it defending themselves, but that's not at all what it is.

Guns are for killing, period. If they weren't then you wouldn't want radical Muslims not to have them...
Yes a gun can stop a bullet if you shoot first and the other bullet is never fired. You walked right into that one, chump.
 
6 weeks after a skinhead murders 9 people in a church, this shit-monger is singing the praises of bringing guns to church.
Shit monger huh?....Would it have been better if the guy stabbed the woman to death...While waiting for that other bunch you hate.....the police?
Some people are too stupid to realize they are stupid.
You fit into that category.
 
So...a woman is attacked by her husband in a church parking lot.....an employee of the church, a concealed carrier draws his gun and orders the guy to stop.....he runs off. It turns out he had already stabbed the woman and by stopping the attack, without firing a shot, he saved her life. Of course, the pistol gave him the edge in scaring off this guy. It is more than likely that without the gun, the attacker would have kept up the attack.

Armed Church Employee Stops Attempted Murder In Church Parking Lot Concealed Nation

After seeing the gun, Haro-Luna fled the parking lot as quickly as he could. Police caught up with him shortly after and was arrested on suspicion of attempted first-degree murder, first-degree assault and felony menacing.

The 41-year-old victim was taken to the hospital. She had been stabbed in the abdomen. Police say she suffered serious injuries, but is recovering after surgery.

In Colorado, private property owners can prohibit the carrying of firearms. This includes churches. Had this church prohibited firearms and had the employee adhered to the prohibition, this 41-year-old victim may not be alive today.


Notice anti gun extremists........he didn't fire a shot.....the guy ran away.....
a woman is attacked by her husband in a church parking lot

Crazy christers
yep....all of them are Nuts. They shoot libs on sight. So keep clear.
 
If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
Guns don't defend, they kill. For all you know the guy would have run off regardless.
Guns don't defend? Are you trying to be an ass?
Guns are only for killing. If you can kill him before you get killed, you win.
Killing can be in defense of life. So you're really going to float that moronic argument?
Can gun stop a bullet? If it can't then it's not defensive. We don't give guns to soldiers to defend themselves, we give them to them to kill the enemy. We might call it defending themselves, but that's not at all what it is.

Guns are for killing, period. If they weren't then you wouldn't want radical Muslims not to have them...


Wellllll...according to this very story...a life was saved....and the gun wasn't fired.........so of course, you are wrong....

The purpose of a gun is to save the life of the one using it...and since most of the time it never has to be fired to achieve that, you are wrong........a cop can keep the peace for an entire career and never fire his weapon.....most soldiers never fire their weapons.....so you are wrong again.....
 
6 weeks after a skinhead murders 9 people in a church, this shit-monger is singing the praises of bringing guns to church.


Moron......of the church shootings I posted, more lives were lost in churches that disarmed their parishioners......15 were killed in gun free churches vs. only two killed in churches where they were allowed to carry guns...and in this story....a life was saved because the guy had a gun at church...without firing a shot....

Do you think about things before you post them....or do you simply make shit up in your delusional mind...wait...you don't need to answer that...
 
Really, do you know the first thing about knives and how deadly they are in the hands of even an inexperienced person........no, you obviously don't.

The gun was the factor that outwieghed the guys knife.....
The guy might have saved her life, the gun didn't. It was certainly efficient in this case, since the SOB ran away, for good reason as guns can kill you, but hardly necessary. And I notice you didn't mention that she should have been armed? Why, because he probably would have used the gun on her instead of the knife...


If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
Guns don't defend, they kill. For all you know the guy would have run off regardless.
Guns don't defend? Are you trying to be an ass?
Guns are only for killing. If you can kill him before you get killed, you win.


did you read the story.....the guy ran away without any shots fired.....and a woman's life was saved......most self,defense with guns...no shots are fired....and in many cases the thug is held, at gun point till the police arrive.....with more guns.....

You need to think more before you post....
 
Well, that is unless he clocked the guy and got the knife away. You don't need a gun, in a church no less, for that.


Really, do you know the first thing about knives and how deadly they are in the hands of even an inexperienced person........no, you obviously don't.

The gun was the factor that outwieghed the guys knife.....
The guy might have saved her life, the gun didn't. It was certainly efficient in this case, since the SOB ran away, for good reason as guns can kill you, but hardly necessary. And I notice you didn't mention that she should have been armed? Why, because he probably would have used the gun on her instead of the knife...


If the guy didn't have a gun the odds are he couldn't have saved her. A guy with a knife is not going to stop when an unarmed guy tells him to. Guns are the most effective self defense tool ever created.

She should have been armed.......she could have shot the guy herself.
Guns don't defend, they kill. For all you know the guy would have run off regardless.

do you think the guy should have taken the chance? If you were that woman would you have bet your life in that.....

You leftist gun grabbers really are nuts...
 

Forum List

Back
Top