Therefore the question is how far could Israel go with either absolute peace or no Palestinians at all.The OP is not about Palestinian foreign policy.P F Tinmore, et al,
It is possible that I tried to shift the discussion on the topic.
(COMMENT)Indeed, you did try to shift focus.P F Tinmore, et al,
No I don't think so.
(COMMENT)You missed the point.
It is a case "misdirection;" a technique used when performing trying to shift the impact and Feint an alternative political strategy.
v/r
R
There is absolutely no Palestinian Foreign Policy on which Israeli survival is dependent? In the absence of such a policy --- we should properly reframe the argument.
Most Respectfully,
R
In that case we probably assume differently since you conclude Israel would've been in a point of extinction ("survive ") - which only strengthen the theory that we shouldn't strive for absolute peace with the Palestinians because no Palestinians at all is not an option since they exist as fact..is that where you going? Don't bother to elaborate, just feel stupid for now, dismissed.