Ravi
Diamond Member
?
If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
Nope. Unable to prove it.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
Yes, if they are LGBT.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
Why not? You could provide witnesses to a jury.Nope. Unable to prove it.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
She hitting the medical pot again.Who the hell even thinks this way?
Do you really sit around and ponder shit like this?![]()
Hearsay.Why not? You could provide witnesses to a jury.Nope. Unable to prove it.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
Eye witness accounts.Hearsay.Why not? You could provide witnesses to a jury.Nope. Unable to prove it.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
Or a weak ass attempt at trying to look like a deep thinker.She hitting the medical pot again.Who the hell even thinks this way?
Do you really sit around and ponder shit like this?![]()
Your asking this question?? A member of the feelings brigade!!
Most importantly children! How else is delayed gratification, self-control, etc., taught?Even children?We can affect how others feel, but ultimately the individual themself is responsible for their own feelings.
And how is one responsible for their feelings? How they act on them I can see but the actual feeling itself, no.
Delayed gratification and self-control are blasphemy to a lib.Most importantly children! How else is delayed gratification, self-control, etc., taught?Even children?We can affect how others feel, but ultimately the individual themself is responsible for their own feelings.
And how is one responsible for their feelings? How they act on them I can see but the actual feeling itself, no.
Responsible for how the act on them. But not the feelings themselves.Most importantly children! How else is delayed gratification, self-control, etc., taught?Even children?We can affect how others feel, but ultimately the individual themself is responsible for their own feelings.
And how is one responsible for their feelings? How they act on them I can see but the actual feeling itself, no.
Buzz off with the partisan bs.Delayed gratification and self-control are blasphemy to a lib.Most importantly children! How else is delayed gratification, self-control, etc., taught?Even children?We can affect how others feel, but ultimately the individual themself is responsible for their own feelings.
And how is one responsible for their feelings? How they act on them I can see but the actual feeling itself, no.
How the Hell could the masses stay dependent if the possessed those qualities.