- Banned
- #21
And how is one responsible for their feelings? How they act on them I can see but the actual feeling itself, no.
Feelings are controllable. You can choose what to allow yourself to feel/dwell on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And how is one responsible for their feelings? How they act on them I can see but the actual feeling itself, no.
I agree. It is up to us if we let another person influence how we feel about things or not.We can affect how others feel, but ultimately the individual themself is responsible for their own feelings.
I'm not convinced that you can.And how is one responsible for their feelings? How they act on them I can see but the actual feeling itself, no.
Feelings are controllable. You can choose what to allow yourself to feel/dwell on.
I know it is strange. Just something I read the other day.I'm not convinced that you can.And how is one responsible for their feelings? How they act on them I can see but the actual feeling itself, no.
Feelings are controllable. You can choose what to allow yourself to feel/dwell on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I think you can choose to not dwell on things, but Im not so sure you can control your feelings.
Haven't you ever thought a certain hurt or angry feeling was pretty much worked through and over...then it appears again out of the blue.( or sometimes by a trigger. a song, a place)
what a strange question. lol
Why not? You could provide witnesses to a jury.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
Nope. Unable to prove it.
Actual Damages
If [name of plaintiff] has proved all of the above, then [he/she] is entitled to recover [his/her] actual damages if [he/she] proves that [name of defendant]’s wrongful conduct was a substantial factor in causing any of the following:
Liability
1. That [name of defendant] made [one or more of] the statement(s) to [a person/persons] other than [name of plaintiff];
2. That [this person/these people] reasonably understood that the statement(s) [was/were] about [name of plaintiff];
3. [That [this person/these people] reasonably understood the statement(s) to mean that [insert ground(s) for defamation per se, e.g., “[name of plaintiff] had committed a crime”]]; and
4. That the statement(s) [was/were] false.
a. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s property, business, trade, profession, or occupation;
b. Expenses [name of plaintiff] had to pay as a result of the defamatory statements;
c. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s reputation; or
d. Shame, mortification, or hurt feelings.
??Eye witness accounts.Why not? You could provide witnesses to a jury.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
Nope. Unable to prove it.
Hearsay.
Why not? You could provide witnesses to a jury.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
Nope. Unable to prove it.
I guess it depends on context.
I looked it up and this was as close as I could find to address your topic.
Defamation per se—Essential Factual Elements (Public Officer/Figure and Limited Public Figure)
Actual Damages
If [name of plaintiff] has proved all of the above, then [he/she] is entitled to recover [his/her] actual damages if [he/she] proves that [name of defendant]’s wrongful conduct was a substantial factor in causing any of the following:
Liability
1. That [name of defendant] made [one or more of] the statement(s) to [a person/persons] other than [name of plaintiff];
2. That [this person/these people] reasonably understood that the statement(s) [was/were] about [name of plaintiff];
3. [That [this person/these people] reasonably understood the statement(s) to mean that [insert ground(s) for defamation per se, e.g., “[name of plaintiff] had committed a crime”]]; and
4. That the statement(s) [was/were] false.
a. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s property, business, trade, profession, or occupation;
b. Expenses [name of plaintiff] had to pay as a result of the defamatory statements;
c. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s reputation; or
d. Shame, mortification, or hurt feelings.
California Civil Jury Instructions CACI 1700. Defamation per se Essential Factual Elements Public Officer Figure and Limited Public Figure Justia
Why not? You could provide witnesses to a jury.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?Feelings are personal property.
A person has the right to tell another how they feel, but they do not have the right to expect another to change their behavior based on how they feel.
Many marriages would last alot longer if both parties agreed to this.
Nope. Unable to prove it.
I guess it depends on context.
I looked it up and this was as close as I could find to address your topic.
Defamation per se—Essential Factual Elements (Public Officer/Figure and Limited Public Figure)
Actual Damages
If [name of plaintiff] has proved all of the above, then [he/she] is entitled to recover [his/her] actual damages if [he/she] proves that [name of defendant]’s wrongful conduct was a substantial factor in causing any of the following:
Liability
1. That [name of defendant] made [one or more of] the statement(s) to [a person/persons] other than [name of plaintiff];
2. That [this person/these people] reasonably understood that the statement(s) [was/were] about [name of plaintiff];
3. [That [this person/these people] reasonably understood the statement(s) to mean that [insert ground(s) for defamation per se, e.g., “[name of plaintiff] had committed a crime”]]; and
4. That the statement(s) [was/were] false.
a. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s property, business, trade, profession, or occupation;
b. Expenses [name of plaintiff] had to pay as a result of the defamatory statements;
c. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s reputation; or
d. Shame, mortification, or hurt feelings.
California Civil Jury Instructions CACI 1700. Defamation per se Essential Factual Elements Public Officer Figure and Limited Public Figure Justia
Defamation is an intentional tort.
defamation of character
False statement(s) made by one person about another. In court, the plaintiff must prove that (1) the defendant made an untrue statement of fact about the plaintiff and (2) the statement was intentionally or accidentally published to a third party.
- 1. The defendant made an untrue statement of fact about the plaintiff.
- 2. The statement was intentionally or accidentally published to a third party. In this context, publication simply means that a third person heard or saw the untrue statement. It does not require appearance in newspapers, magazines, or books.
There such thing as private property, real of philosophical. We elected Obama to end that quaint, outdated concept, didn't we?
It means that this thread is crazy....Why not? You could provide witnesses to a jury.If someone injures your feelings then, can they be persecuted for injuring your property?
Nope. Unable to prove it.
I guess it depends on context.
I looked it up and this was as close as I could find to address your topic.
Defamation per se—Essential Factual Elements (Public Officer/Figure and Limited Public Figure)
Actual Damages
If [name of plaintiff] has proved all of the above, then [he/she] is entitled to recover [his/her] actual damages if [he/she] proves that [name of defendant]’s wrongful conduct was a substantial factor in causing any of the following:
Liability
1. That [name of defendant] made [one or more of] the statement(s) to [a person/persons] other than [name of plaintiff];
2. That [this person/these people] reasonably understood that the statement(s) [was/were] about [name of plaintiff];
3. [That [this person/these people] reasonably understood the statement(s) to mean that [insert ground(s) for defamation per se, e.g., “[name of plaintiff] had committed a crime”]]; and
4. That the statement(s) [was/were] false.
a. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s property, business, trade, profession, or occupation;
b. Expenses [name of plaintiff] had to pay as a result of the defamatory statements;
c. Harm to [name of plaintiff]’s reputation; or
d. Shame, mortification, or hurt feelings.
California Civil Jury Instructions CACI 1700. Defamation per se Essential Factual Elements Public Officer Figure and Limited Public Figure Justia
Defamation is an intentional tort.
defamation of character
False statement(s) made by one person about another. In court, the plaintiff must prove that (1) the defendant made an untrue statement of fact about the plaintiff and (2) the statement was intentionally or accidentally published to a third party.
- 1. The defendant made an untrue statement of fact about the plaintiff.
- 2. The statement was intentionally or accidentally published to a third party. In this context, publication simply means that a third person heard or saw the untrue statement. It does not require appearance in newspapers, magazines, or books.
I said I guess everything depends on context, and I googled hurt feelings property and defamation, it's what I got.
So what does your reply mean?