Zone1 Are you okay with women displaying their breasts in public? Minnesota court just ruled it's non-sexual

[Jarlaxle]

Wow, you have more issues than National Geographic.

She's nuttier than squirrel shit.

Just decades of study showing that both men and women universally feel that sexy clothing that is revealing, elicits more sexual arousal in men, more sexual interest, and so, heightened chances that a borderline person will break down and resort to rape or assault.

In fact, most women will tell you they wear sexy, revealing clothing to arouse sexual interest and to be "noticed."

As usual though, I would have thought this common knowledge to any high-school child so, as usual, above and beyond the ken of a leftist, so I expect that you will first deny all of this then finish by adding a funny of dismissal.

Majority of men believe women more likely to be sexually assaulted if wearing revealing clothes, study suggests

Exclusive: Two-fifths of women also hold the view which campaigners describe as 'the most common myth across generations'

www.independent.co.uk

Now multiply that by women walking around practically naked and the potential for harm to women becomes obvious.

Here Are 9 Times Clothing Was Blamed for Sexual Assault — Rather Than the Obvious

Since 1999, Denim Day has asked people to wear a pair of jeans on a Wednesday in April to raise awareness for sexual assault. According to Denim Day's official website, the campaign was triggered by a 1999 ruling by the Italian Supreme court in…

www.mic.com

From Attire to Assault: Clothing, Objectification, and De-humanization – A Possible Prelude to Sexual Violence? - PMC

In the context of objectification and violence, little attention has been paid to the perception neuroscience of how the human brain perceives bodies and objectifies them. Various studies point to how external cues such as appearance and attire ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

You ******* oxygen thief. You are subhuman.

 

[stockhome]

I thought they did that at Walmarx already.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Minnesota Supreme Court Rules Women Can Completely Bare Their Breasts In Public

The Minnesota Supreme Court decided that women completely exposing their breasts in public is legally acceptable.The ruling in the case State of Minnesota v. Plancarte revolved around Eloisa Rubi Plancarte, who had exposed herself in a police officer’s presence by revealing her bare breasts. The...

www.dailywire.com

So Minnesota Supreme Court has said that a woman swinging her titties around town is not sexual in nature, and it's not illegal or indecent exposure to do so.

I say this is proof of the perversion that leftism leads us to. Biologically, boobs are a turn-on for men, and boys. They are basically a "chest-ass", as men are naturally biologically attracted to hip curvature.

Yet, here we have a state justice system seemingly caught up equality so much that they avoid biological differences. This is definitely Tim Walz land.. and let's hope their perversion stays tucked away up in the corner of the midwest.

Getting into Clinton territory here with what's sexual and what isn't!! If a BJ is ok in the White House, flapping breasts in the street, I think guys should cover up their trunks and flap their scrotums about in public. The old saying, "If you can't beat them, join them".

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Exorcism Of Creepy Thoughts "

* Arcane Translation *

Getting into Clinton territory here with what's sexual and what isn't!! If a BJ is ok in the White House, flapping breasts in the street, I think guys should cover up their trunks and flap their scrotums about in public. The old saying, "If you can't beat them, join them".

Clearly women are not publicly displaying their ovaries .

A difference between displaying breasts versus a floppy jack scrotum festival is that liberating men to feed infants in public with ejaculate is not the same as liberating women to feed infants in public with milk , or to allow them equal freedom to be shirtless on a beach .

* Stranger Than Most *

 

[beagle9]

" Exorcism Of Creepy Thoughts "

* Arcane Translation *

Clearly women are not publicly displaying their ovaries .

A difference between displaying breasts versus a floppy jack scrotum festival is that liberating men to feed infants in public with ejaculate is not the same as liberating women to feed infants in public with milk , or to allow them equal freedom to be shirtless on a beach .

* Stranger Than Most *

What a hellish picture you paint in your words when speaking. Dam dude...

Look women or men have no reason to pull out any of their private part's in public.

Bottle's are for feeding babies in the public when it comes to woman and their children, otherwise breast milk can be drawn in private, and then made available to infants by bottle if necessary in the public square. The entire issue is truly ridiculous or perverted.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

nope, no bill here for that. so you're wrong, my normal is Illinois.

I was discussing the topic. You aren't.

 

[jc456]

I was discussing the topic. You aren't.

Me too

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I share my moobs with the public quite liberally, but always make sure to shave them first.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Not Deprived Of Free Roam Or Free Association Or Private Property Or Willful Intents Through Contract "

* Have Yonder Seen Oyster Hoods And Sun Tanned Bob Bees *

Look women or men have no reason to pull out any of their private part's in public.

An awareness for limits of public purview would not prevent scheduling or registration for expository naked nest by age of consent attendees , on public grounds ; and , bare ass fecund is public health safety concern .

Where should women be able to tan their breasts in fresh air and daylight , and why are males allowed to bare naked chest while females are not ?

Most women option not to expose their breasts , due to hue mammon buffoonery , though such an action would not be illegitimate aggression against my self , though perverts such as yearn selves seem inclined to adverse reaction of moral outrage to such situations .

Wherever a safety or security issue exists , such is a legitimate interest of a state , as an occurrence of illegitimate aggression is expected .

* Blubbering About Inconsequential Worries *

Bottle's are for feeding babies in the public when it comes to woman and their children, otherwise breast milk can be drawn in private, and then made available to infants by bottle if necessary in the public square. The entire issue is truly ridiculous or perverted.

When sensibilities are content , a moron adds more on so as to implement the morose thereby creating nausea .

Are hue promoting his ba as well , an abdication to authority for do good and forbid bad , via a system of government devised to assure against sectarian moral vices , which do not specifically qualify as illegitimate aggression ?

Where does the shame game cover ring up stop with populism for democracy as tyranny by collective majority that is against independence of the individual ?

Form follows function and attire for an arid environment with heavy dust and heat with limited irrigation does not apply elsewhere .

 

[JoeB131]

Minnesota Supreme Court Rules Women Can Completely Bare Their Breasts In Public

The Minnesota Supreme Court decided that women completely exposing their breasts in public is legally acceptable.The ruling in the case State of Minnesota v. Plancarte revolved around Eloisa Rubi Plancarte, who had exposed herself in a police officer’s presence by revealing her bare breasts. The...

www.dailywire.com

So Minnesota Supreme Court has said that a woman swinging her titties around town is not sexual in nature, and it's not illegal or indecent exposure to do so.

I say this is proof of the perversion that leftism leads us to. Biologically, boobs are a turn-on for men, and boys. They are basically a "chest-ass", as men are naturally biologically attracted to hip curvature.

Yet, here we have a state justice system seemingly caught up equality so much that they avoid biological differences. This is definitely Tim Walz land.. and let's hope their perversion stays tucked away up in the corner of the midwest.

Maybe you should stop being a prude.

In many points in history, bare breasts for women were perfectly acceptable.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Maybe you should stop being a prude.

In many points in history, bare breasts for women were perfectly acceptable.

.


Sure thing.

In places where sluts were plentiful.

Advice to men in today's world -- why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?

I'm so happy to live in a place where men are happy to buy the cow and live with her for a lifetime. A lot fewer STD's and our large Catholic families are the families that will repopulate this country when the left cult has sterilized itself.

Bye. Take your tits with you. We'll keep ours for our many babies.




.

 

[jc456]

Maybe you should stop being a prude.

In many points in history, bare breasts for women were perfectly acceptable.

Name one

 

[AZrailwhale]

Name one

Minos for one.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Minos for one.

.

And the Minoans went bye-bye.

 

[AZrailwhale]

.

And the Minoans went bye-bye.

So you are saying the eruption was caused by bare breasts?

 

[jc456]

Minos for one.

Most likely Eve

 

[JoeB131]

Sure thing.

In places where sluts were plentiful.

Advice to men in today's world -- why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?

I'm so happy to live in a place where men are happy to buy the cow and live with her for a lifetime. A lot fewer STD's and our large Catholic families are the families that will repopulate this country when the left cult has sterilized itself.

Bye. Take your tits with you. We'll keep ours for our many babies.

Uh, you should probably check in with your left-wing Pope.

 

[jc456]

Uh, you should probably check in with your left-wing Pope.

Who?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Who?

.

They really NEED to believe that Leo XIV is "progressive".


.

 

[JoeB131]

.

They really NEED to believe that Leo XIV is "progressive".


.

He's from Chicago and served a third world diocese.

Yeah, if you guys were disappointed with Francis, Leo is going to be much worse for you.