Are you going to refuse any increase in any tax refund you get or are you going to be a hypocrite?

I will back up my mouth by refusing any increased refund in my taxes.

  • I'm a liberal with integrity and I will send it back so my actions match my rhetoric.

  • I'm a liberal....so umm..... SHOW ME DA MONEY!


Results are only viewable after voting.
I intend to waste mine as quickly as possible!



tumblr_ny7ahjf6lf1uugz92o1_500.gif
 
You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?

Hi Grampa Murked U
What about Constitutionalists who believe all taxation should be
voluntary and respect the consent of the governed workers being taxed?

What if I contest the change that puts limits on deducting
mortgage related taxes or deducting state taxes.

isn't it a conservative value to entrust states to manage their
own programs and NOT rely on paying federal govt to do that?

Should we be REWARDING citizens and states for investing
MORE of their taxes into state run programs managed democratically
rather than paying and relying more and more on federal govt to run things?

Isn't that backwards and hypocritical
to demand states rights and localized health care
but then take away tax deductions from states
and force more people to pay that to federal govt instead???
 
You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
You can't refuse a tax refund, dude. But, you should know that the price of labor is set by the market, not by the tax code. So, as workers take marginally more money home (for instance, an extra $1000 translates to $0.48/hour), companies will then be able to grant lesser initial salaries and lesser raises to workers. We can see this scenario play out in every trickle down fantasy for the last 40 years. But hey... who needs things like 'history" and facts, when we have whatever urges and passing thoughts fizzle into our colons, right?
 
You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
You can't refuse a tax refund, dude. But, you should know that the price of labor is set by the market, not by the tax code. So, as workers take marginally more money home (for instance, an extra $1000 translates to $0.48/hour), companies will then be able to grant lesser initial salaries and lesser raises to workers. We can see this scenario play out in every trickle down fantasy for the last 40 years. But hey... who needs things like 'history" and facts, when we have whatever urges and passing thoughts fizzle into our colons, right?



IRS takes donations dude ..



And the rest you posted was just gibberish
 
If you're unhappy that your government is going to be taking less money from you, then by all means, send back any increase.
Of course, it's not the tax breaks for lower earners that any liberal or Democrat opposes. So each and every one of you sounds like a goddamn idiot.
 
You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?

A good comparison would be if seven course meals were passed out to the rich and a baloney sandwich was given to the starving poor. You would be asking the poor if they were going to refuse the sandwich.
 
Last edited:
I will be paying more.

You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?

Hi Grampa Murked U
What about Constitutionalists who believe all taxation should be
voluntary and respect the consent of the governed workers being taxed?

What if I contest the change that puts limits on deducting
mortgage related taxes or deducting state taxes.

isn't it a conservative value to entrust states to manage their
own programs and NOT rely on paying federal govt to do that?

Should we be REWARDING citizens and states for investing
MORE of their taxes into state run programs managed democratically
rather than paying and relying more and more on federal govt to run things?

Isn't that backwards and hypocritical
to demand states rights and localized health care
but then take away tax deductions from states
and force more people to pay that to federal govt instead???

Blue states like California, New York, New Jersey, et. al., are taxing and spending themselves into oblivion. Residents of those states will now have to pay the price for the decisions of their respective nanny states, or they can move to fiscally responsible states. This levels the playing field for every state to compete for residents.

I live in California and I will be paying more. Significantly more- at least 5 figures more! I'll have to see how much I am paying for the privilege of living in great weather and decide if it is worth it......
 
I will be paying more.

You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?

Hi Grampa Murked U
What about Constitutionalists who believe all taxation should be
voluntary and respect the consent of the governed workers being taxed?

What if I contest the change that puts limits on deducting
mortgage related taxes or deducting state taxes.

isn't it a conservative value to entrust states to manage their
own programs and NOT rely on paying federal govt to do that?

Should we be REWARDING citizens and states for investing
MORE of their taxes into state run programs managed democratically
rather than paying and relying more and more on federal govt to run things?

Isn't that backwards and hypocritical
to demand states rights and localized health care
but then take away tax deductions from states
and force more people to pay that to federal govt instead???

Blue states like California, New York, New Jersey, et. al., are taxing and spending themselves into oblivion. Residents of those states will now have to pay the price for the decisions of their respective nanny states, or they can move to fiscally responsible states. This levels the playing field for every state to compete for residents.

I live in California and I will be paying more. Significantly more- at least 5 figures more! I'll have to see how much I am paying for the privilege of living in great weather and decide if it is worth it......

Dear Zander
Wouldn't it be more fair to give MORE time for people
to move, to change their financial structures,
or for states to change their taxing structures and programs
BEFORE punishing taxpayers for living in such states?

What if someone doesn't APPROVE of their state policies?
But can't get enough support to correct problems with state budgets?
Are you going to punish people because of the states they live in?
 

Forum List

Back
Top