You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
What are you going to do with yours?You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
You're about the 50th RWnut to try this stupid argument.
Answer the question.You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
You're about the 50th RWnut to try this stupid argument.
You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
You can't refuse a tax refund, dude. But, you should know that the price of labor is set by the market, not by the tax code. So, as workers take marginally more money home (for instance, an extra $1000 translates to $0.48/hour), companies will then be able to grant lesser initial salaries and lesser raises to workers. We can see this scenario play out in every trickle down fantasy for the last 40 years. But hey... who needs things like 'history" and facts, when we have whatever urges and passing thoughts fizzle into our colons, right?You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
Nah, it will be another car.
You can't refuse a tax refund, dude. But, you should know that the price of labor is set by the market, not by the tax code. So, as workers take marginally more money home (for instance, an extra $1000 translates to $0.48/hour), companies will then be able to grant lesser initial salaries and lesser raises to workers. We can see this scenario play out in every trickle down fantasy for the last 40 years. But hey... who needs things like 'history" and facts, when we have whatever urges and passing thoughts fizzle into our colons, right?You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
If only great minds like you are arguing against me, I figure i will rule the universe within a decade or so.And the rest you posted was just gibberish
Of course, it's not the tax breaks for lower earners that any liberal or Democrat opposes. So each and every one of you sounds like a goddamn idiot.If you're unhappy that your government is going to be taking less money from you, then by all means, send back any increase.
You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
Hi Grampa Murked U
What about Constitutionalists who believe all taxation should be
voluntary and respect the consent of the governed workers being taxed?
What if I contest the change that puts limits on deducting
mortgage related taxes or deducting state taxes.
isn't it a conservative value to entrust states to manage their
own programs and NOT rely on paying federal govt to do that?
Should we be REWARDING citizens and states for investing
MORE of their taxes into state run programs managed democratically
rather than paying and relying more and more on federal govt to run things?
Isn't that backwards and hypocritical
to demand states rights and localized health care
but then take away tax deductions from states
and force more people to pay that to federal govt instead???
I will be paying more.
You gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
Hi Grampa Murked U
What about Constitutionalists who believe all taxation should be
voluntary and respect the consent of the governed workers being taxed?
What if I contest the change that puts limits on deducting
mortgage related taxes or deducting state taxes.
isn't it a conservative value to entrust states to manage their
own programs and NOT rely on paying federal govt to do that?
Should we be REWARDING citizens and states for investing
MORE of their taxes into state run programs managed democratically
rather than paying and relying more and more on federal govt to run things?
Isn't that backwards and hypocritical
to demand states rights and localized health care
but then take away tax deductions from states
and force more people to pay that to federal govt instead???
Blue states like California, New York, New Jersey, et. al., are taxing and spending themselves into oblivion. Residents of those states will now have to pay the price for the decisions of their respective nanny states, or they can move to fiscally responsible states. This levels the playing field for every state to compete for residents.
I live in California and I will be paying more. Significantly more- at least 5 figures more! I'll have to see how much I am paying for the privilege of living in great weather and decide if it is worth it......
LOL Wait till they come for gramps medicare and SS I'll lmaoYou gonna put your money where your mouth is LITERALLY?
Or are you going to be a two faced tard and keep the money?
You're about the 50th RWnut to try this stupid argument.