Iran’s top diplomat said Tuesday that the tentative deal to end the war with the United States would require Israel to withdraw from Lebanon — a condition Israel has already rejected and that could si...
www.yahoo.com
So by my informal count there are at least four different versions of the Iran "deal," and they are all contradictory...and only one of the four versions comes from people who know WTF it says. (But it will be made public in a few days).
The Prez and JDV are saying that Iran gets NOTHING until it starts to DO what it promised to do (e.g., open the infamous strait), it has agreed to kill its nuclear program - details to be worked out - and the U.S. is giving them NOT ONE DIME of taxpayer money. "We" will set up an investment fund for OTHERS to invest in Iran's rebuilding, and we might plan it, but NO U.S. DOLLARS(!).
The Democrats (who are evil and scorn the Truth) say that part of the "deal" is that WE are giving Iran THREE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS (presumably of U.S. taxpayer money), and Isn't that outrageous?!! And of course, this "deal" is no different, and certainly no better than the Obama deal of a few years ago. One minor point: Trump intends to treat the final "deal" as a treaty and seek Senate approval, as required by the U.S. Constitution. Obama never gave that a thought, so his deal was B.S. from the start.
The Iranians are saying (of course) that THEY FORCED THE U.S. INTO THIS DEAL, and part of it is that Israel MUST GET OUT OF SOUTHERN LEBANON, and must be kind to the Iranian proxies, Hamas, the Hooters, and Hezhollah. If Israel attacks any of the foregoing - even in retaliation - it is a deal breaker. But of course, if Iran attacks Israel, that is just Business As Usual, and not a deal breaker at all.
The Israeli's are saying that Trump appears to have betrayed them by not demanding that Iran STOP funding its proxies who are terrorizing Israel continually. But I think Vance hinted that we DID demand that Iran stop this bullshit. Not sure.
In any event, we have yet another situation where everyone with a word to say is saying it, with or without anything to back it up, and the MEDIA TREATS IT ALL AS NEWS, with one source equally valid as any other.
I hate it when they do this. It is not "breaking news" when some asshole renders an ignorant opinion about something where he does not know the facts. That is not news it is gossip.
What is a mother to believe?
