Are words responsible for Charlie Kirk's political assassination and if they are who's words get a pass, Charlie's?

[Dante]

Rebekah Jones

Greg

FAIL

FAILURE!



Jones posted about Kirk on Wednesday, writing: “Save your sympathies for the innocent bystanders caught in the crossfire of MAGA’s violent political messaging machine.” The website republished that post along with other pieces of Jones’ personal information.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/13/business/charlie-kirk-death-fired-comments

 

[Dante]

And we have plenty of examples of the left using the same kind of rhetoric, doesnt mean we should be violent toward them.

And let's not forget, it was the democrats, who initially criticized Trump for using the word "fight" in his speech.

Rightwing People here have been slyly insinuating shooting people they disagree with since I first joined this site

grow up

be honest

suck it up

 

[Dante]

Karen Attiah

Greg

One more FAIL!!!!



“My only direct reference to Kirk was one post – his own words on record,” she said in her Substack letter. The letter included a screenshot of a Bluesky post alluding to a 2023 remark from Kirk about how several prominent Black women “do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously.

“You have to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.”

Washington Post columnist says she was fired over posts after Charlie Kirk’s killing

Karen Attiah says she was dropped by newspaper after 11 years for addressing political violence, race and gun control

www.theguardian.com

 

[BULLDOG]

Hmmm, your inept attempt to justify murder as the penalty for speech you find unacceptable validates my belief that you're a POS scumbag.

Do you even realize when you are making absurd accusations?

 

[cnm]

Are words responsible for Charlie Kirk's political assassination and if they are who's words get a pass, Charlie's?

Citizen.

Please.

Next you'll be suggesting there should be one standard for all.

 

[Concerned American]

Baiting youngsters and playing mind games

Like telling little boys and girls they can be something they are not and never will be? Like that baiting and playing of mind games?

He was a garden variety provocateur

Again, like Colbert, Kimmel, and Fallon? Are you saying you advocate for their murders?

 

[cnm]

“My only direct reference to Kirk was one post – his own words on record,” she said in her Substack letter. The letter included a screenshot of a Bluesky post alluding to a 2023 remark from Kirk about how several prominent Black women “do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously.

“You have to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.”

Using Kirk's words as an indication of his opinions?

MAGAts are right to be enraged. Who ever heard of such a thing?

 

[Concerned American]

Do you even realize when you are making absurd accusations?

Nothing that you haven't promoted yourself. If you can't handle the truth, STFU.

 

[cnm]

grow up

be honest

suck it up

You do know whom you're addressing, right?

 

[BULLDOG]

Nothing that you haven't promoted yourself. If you can't handle the truth, STFU.

That's ok. You're just another brainwashed trump cult member. Allowances are made for your childish remarks.

 

[BULLDOG]

You do know whom you're addressing, right?

He's addressing another crazy cult member.

 

[petro]

Citizen.

Please.

Next you'll be suggesting there should be one standard for all.

The standard in America has always been say what you want.

It's the murdering people for what they say part that is wrong you stupid Kiwi ****.

Right now, that violence is from the left.
A man who politely invited people to engage and talk was murdered for wanting peaceful dialog.

Take notice also that no cities are burning, there is no rioting and no calls from the right to get the trannys, because there was never violence against them.
Criticism isn't a physical attack.

****, you people are stupid.
Especially you dumb foreigners.

 

[blackhawk]

Anyone who is going to pretend the left has not claimed words from the right inspire and incite violence is a total hypocrite full of shit and someone who should never be taken seriously.

 

[Concerned American]

That's ok. You're just another brainwashed trump cult member. Allowances are made for your childish remarks.

Childish remarks like your ignorant attempt to justify murder?
Kirks words didn't deserve to rise to that level, and he didn't deserve to be shot. However, they did rise to that level, and he did deserve to be shot in the mind of that crazy guy.

 

[Leo123]

We keep seeing claims that there are people who's words are responsible for the murder of Charlie Kirk.

Like this as an example: "the people responsible for Charlie Kirk's political assassination."

If words are to blame, can the attacks on thoughts and ideas be far behind? And who's words are to blame (supposedly), and do Charlie's own words get a pass? If so how is that fair?

People are condemning Democrats who have used the word "FIGHT" in political speeches. Well, let's take a look at something quite interesting:

WATCH: Trump used ‘fight’ or ‘fighting’ 20 times in rally speech, Dean says​

WATCH: Trump used ‘fight’ or ‘fighting’ 20 times in rally speech, Dean says

Prosecutors at President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial are using footage of the rally he headlined ahead of the riot on the Capitol to argue he incited the crowd.

www.pbs.org

and...

Trump's Jan. 6 Speech, was A Key Part Of Impeachment Trial - (he was impeached twice)

There was a discussion at the time: Capitol riots: Did Trump's words at rally incite violence?

later...
Trump using Jan. 6 riot as campaign rallying cry
In Iowa, he called those convicted of attacking the U.S. Capitol "J6 hostages."

yet we have Trump on record: Trump once called Jan. 6 a 'heinous attack.' Now he calls it a 'day of love.'
The former president has increasingly defended his supporters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, most recently referring to them as "we."

Before many were "pardoned" Jan. 6th criminal defendants said Trump incited them

A look into Trump's words: Dissecting Trump’s “Peacefully and Patriotically” Defense of the January 6th Attack

Now back to Charlie Kirk's own words...

Shove it. You guys are certifiable loons.

 

[Concerned American]

The standard in America has always been say what you want.

It's the murdering people for what they say part that is wrong you stupid Kiwi ****.

Right now, that violence is from the left.
A man who politely invited people to engage and talk was murdered for wanting peaceful dialog.

Take notice also that no cities are burning, there is no rioting and no calls from the right to get the trannys, because there was never violence against them.
Criticism isn't a physical attack.

****, you people are stupid.
Especially you dumb foreigners.

Their hatred for anything that disagrees with their childish desires is fair game. The leftist cult members on this site will twist like pretzels to justify this insanity.

 

[petro]

Their hatred for anything that disagrees with their childish desires is fair game. The leftist cult members on this site will twist like pretzels to justify this insanity.

It's like trying to reason with toddlers.
The worst are these foreign assholes throwing their worthless views in.

 

[MarcATL]

They cling to that Democrat 19 percent stuff while ignoring that Republicans can't go home and hold town halls without getting cussed out. That's not happening to Democrats.

They only have as much propaganda as their handlers gave them.

They didn't get the instructions on how to respond to a request for the Republican Party poll numbers.

Hence, they flee!!!

 

[HikerGuy83]

We keep seeing claims that there are people who's words are responsible for the murder of Charlie Kirk.

Like this as an example: "the people responsible for Charlie Kirk's political assassination."

If words are to blame, can the attacks on thoughts and ideas be far behind? And who's words are to blame (supposedly), and do Charlie's own words get a pass? If so how is that fair?

People are condemning Democrats who have used the word "FIGHT" in political speeches. Well, let's take a look at something quite interesting:

WATCH: Trump used ‘fight’ or ‘fighting’ 20 times in rally speech, Dean says​

WATCH: Trump used ‘fight’ or ‘fighting’ 20 times in rally speech, Dean says

Prosecutors at President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial are using footage of the rally he headlined ahead of the riot on the Capitol to argue he incited the crowd.

www.pbs.org

and...

Trump's Jan. 6 Speech, was A Key Part Of Impeachment Trial - (he was impeached twice)

There was a discussion at the time: Capitol riots: Did Trump's words at rally incite violence?

later...
Trump using Jan. 6 riot as campaign rallying cry
In Iowa, he called those convicted of attacking the U.S. Capitol "J6 hostages."

yet we have Trump on record: Trump once called Jan. 6 a 'heinous attack.' Now he calls it a 'day of love.'
The former president has increasingly defended his supporters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, most recently referring to them as "we."

Before many were "pardoned" Jan. 6th criminal defendants said Trump incited them

A look into Trump's words: Dissecting Trump’s “Peacefully and Patriotically” Defense of the January 6th Attack

Now back to Charlie Kirk's own words...

I thought it was an aught-six.

And a kid who somehow felt this was O.K. for him to do.

Words are nothing more than vibrations of the vocal cords. They don't kill anyone.

 

[HikerGuy83]

They only have as much propaganda as their handlers gave them.

They didn't get the instructions on how to respond to a request for the Republican Party poll numbers.

Hence, they flee!!!

More from the board bulls**tter.

You gonna give us your evidence for calling the killer a MAGA less than 30 minutes after it happened?