Are We On the Verge of a Breakthrough on the SAVE America Act?

After what is happening in CA, people are getting their eyes opened to democrat voting fraud and cheating as well as changing traditional ways people vote, at the polls.
You got your MAGA butts beat fairly and squarely. Go whine elsewhere.
 
You got your MAGA butts beat fairly and squarely. Go whine elsewhere.
Nope,



You're in denial, there are plenty more questions regarding CA's Democrat voting fraud.
 
And almost two months later, no breakthrough and no chance of one.

A reckoning is coming.

View attachment 1268293
Rome was not built in a day..........it takes time for something large with impact........genius!

you can't rush it........or fast track it like you think, that's not how the real works, this is not your unicorn fantasy realm
 

Are We On the Verge of a Breakthrough on the SAVE America Act?


I hope not. If so many people are against saving America, it must be some really good case law that stands to end a lot of corruption putting a great many of our politicians out of business.

The fact that 80% or more in Congress are not jumping to save America on Day One should tell you some idea how far gone we are.

Better still, ask yourself why they were not trying to pass a Save America act 30 years ago???
 
Because it keeps happening you retarded cow. Once we have laws that only allow us citizens to present an ID to vote we won’t have to talk about it any more.
How about a retinal scan. That sounds about as secure as it could be. Look in the ocular device that reads your retina while you vote. I like it.
 
After what is happening in CA, people are getting their eyes opened to democrat voting fraud and cheating as well as changing traditional ways people vote, at the polls.

I collect 19th century picture ID's.
 
If the SAVE Act doesn't pass we will remain an OCCUPIED country and the demented LEFT Marxist Supremacists will cheat us into Civil War 2.0.
One way or another, this darkness got to give...:eusa_whistle:
 

Are We On the Verge of a Breakthrough on the SAVE America Act?​

Thune and his crowd are running out the clock on all the annoying orange’s legislation as best they can. Once the midterms are behind them, they’ll kill it deader than an armadillo in the middle of a highway.
 
LOL, what will you talk about when Trump isn't around anymore?

They will probably talk about the Trump Years as if they were the invasion of Normandy beach or the invasion of Hitler.

Trump himself will be remembered as somewhere between the Alien and the Predator. Of course, all the people (half the country) voting for him (against democrats) will be regarded as between lilliputians and zombies.

Can you just imagine the "history" books they will publish telling us "what really happened?"
 

Are We On the Verge of a Breakthrough on the SAVE America Act?

22 Mar 2026 ~~ By Matt Margolis

I’ve been admittedly skeptical that the current effort to pass the SAVE America Act will succeed. I want it to pass. Desperately. And from where I sit, there’s no reason why it shouldn’t pass. But we all know why something so popular and commonsense can’t get to President Donald Trump’s desk for his signature. Democrats in Congress don’t want election integrity and are fighting against it like their power is on the line.
Despite my skepticism, Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), the lead sponsor of the bill, is confident the SAVE America Act is going to pass — and after just six days of debate, Democrats may already be looking for a way out.
As you know, the bill does two things. It requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote and a voter ID when casting a ballot. Polls repeatedly show that Americans overwhelmingly support these ideas, regardless of political party or race.
And Sen. Lee knows it, too.
"Americans overwhelmingly believe that voters in the United States, you need to be US citizens," Lee said. "So our bill does two things in order to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat."
The fight right now isn't really about the merits. Let’s be honest about that. It's about the Senate's cloture threshold, the 60-vote supermajority needed to end debate and move to a final vote. Republicans don't have those numbers on their own, which means they need Democrats to break ranks. Lee's strategy is to make them do exactly that, and he's drawing on a historical playbook to get it done.
"We're using a playbook that in a slightly different form was used in 1964 to overcome a cloture gap of thirty-two votes," Lee said, referring to the landmark Civil Rights Act debate. Back then, the Senate debated for sixty days before enough votes materialized to close debate. Today's cloture deficit is far smaller. "We've got only a ten-vote cloture deficit to overcome here," Lee noted. "This is a simpler bill, and it's preferred by eighty-five percent of American voters."
~Snip~
According to Lee, the early signs are apparently promising. After only six days on the floor, he says Democrats are reportedly already hunting for an exit, which tells you something about the political pressure building around this vote.
The only secret to passing the SAVE America Act, Lee says, is time and willpower. Six days in, it looks like the willpower is holding — and the clock is doing the rest of the work.




Commentary:
We keep being told by Democrats that this is Jim Crow 2.0 or 1930s Germany.
Doesn’t matter if it passes and is signed into “law”. The problem is always enforcement. The law will have no teeth, as so many of them do not, except for punitive financial penalties which end up being just “the cost of doing business”. Its provisions will never be observed or enforced in Blue Sanctuary Plantation States, cities or counties where Democrats dominate. Democrats are a law unto themselves, and nobody ever messes with them. The U.S. Congress is no longer a solution. It’s become the problem.

No, it will not pass with the anti-trans and no men in sports riders.
 
15th post
In the end its irrelevant. The Constitution grants states the right to enact their own rules over elections.
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Wrong!
Federalism divides government power between a central national authority and constituent state governments. It allows limited state independence through enumerated powers, reserved rights under the Tenth Amendment, and localized policy making, ensuring that individual states can tailor laws to their unique regional needs while maintaining a unified country.
While states operate with significant autonomy, their independence is not absolute. The Supremacy Clause (Article VI) of the Constitution dictates that federal law is the "supreme law of the land," meaning federal laws override conflicting state laws. Additionally, the Fourteenth Amendment places federal constraints on states to ensure they cannot violate the fundamental rights, due process, or equal protection of any citizen.
 
No, it will not pass with the anti-trans and no men in sports riders.
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Meanwhile the above violates Title IX, of the Civil Rights Act.
Federal guidance established by executive order directs the Department of Education to interpret Title IX as strictly separating sports by biological sex assigned at birth. Under this stance, allowing transgender women to compete in female divisions is considered a violation, and the administration has opened investigations and threatened funding for schools with trans-inclusive policies.
 
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Wrong!
Federalism divides government power between a central national authority and constituent state governments. It allows limited state independence through enumerated powers, reserved rights under the Tenth Amendment, and localized policy making, ensuring that individual states can tailor laws to their unique regional needs while maintaining a unified country.
While states operate with significant autonomy, their independence is not absolute. The Supremacy Clause (Article VI) of the Constitution dictates that federal law is the "supreme law of the land," meaning federal laws override conflicting state laws. Additionally, the Fourteenth Amendment places federal constraints on states to ensure they cannot violate the fundamental rights, due process, or equal protection of any citizen.
Interesting.

However, re: the Save Act, too many GOP legislators disagree with you.
 
Back
Top Bottom