Are the tariffs issued by President Trump a constitutional issue

Are the tariffs issued by President Trump a constitutional issue​

The President is NOT Using Article II hence no Constitutional issue


Trump’s tariff powers​

Trump’s executive order implementing his so-called reciprocal tariffs says that he derives his authority for the action from four sources in the United States Code.

Among them are the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the National Emergency Act.

A president using those laws in tandem can declare an emergency and then impose related tariffs.


Wednesday’s order declared a national emergency in response to what it called an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to America’s economy and security.

That threat is based on “the domestic economic policies of key trading partners and structural imbalances in the global trading system,” the order says.

Trump is the first president to use the IEEPA to impose tariffs, according to the Congressional Research Service.

 

Trump approval falls to 43%, lowest since returning to office, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds​

 
It’s a solution, one not any mther fker before had the balls to take on. Spare me your price concerns when you didn’t care when inflation went to 9%.
No, they haven't because the nuclear option is obviously to damned dangerous, except to a business moron, known for taking bankruptcy to protect himself, while his other investors, contractor and supplier, took a bath, getting soaked for their investments.
 
Last edited:
No, they haven't because the nuclear option is obviously to damned dangerous, except to a business moron, known for taking bankruptcy to protect himself, while his other investors, contractor and supplier, took a bath, getting soaked for their investments.

We have to get past ‘fear-mongering’ over tariffs: Charles Payne​

 
The President is NOT Using Article II hence no Constitutional issue


Trump’s tariff powers​

Trump’s executive order implementing his so-called reciprocal tariffs says that he derives his authority for the action from four sources in the United States Code.

Among them are the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the National Emergency Act.

A president using those laws in tandem can declare an emergency and then impose related tariffs.


Wednesday’s order declared a national emergency in response to what it called an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to America’s economy and security.

That threat is based on “the domestic economic policies of key trading partners and structural imbalances in the global trading system,” the order says.

Trump is the first president to use the IEEPA to impose tariffs, according to the Congressional Research Service.


Falsely declaring an emergency in order to create de facto blockade of the U.S. economy is an act of war against the U.S., and that is a constitutional issue:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them"
 
Falsely declaring an emergency in order to create de facto blockade of the U.S. economy is an act of war against the U.S., and that is a constitutional issue:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them"
There is no national emergency, no capitol burning.

This is NaziTrump trying for more power.
 
How is it a “free market” when we basically pay other nations to put tariffs on our goods, allowing them to subsidize their exports?
How that is any way in touch with reality?

The US doesn't pay tariffs that other countries implement. Each country pays for their own tariffs. You're as clueless as Trump is.
 
Falsely declaring an emergency in order to create de facto blockade of the U.S. economy is an act of war against the U.S., and that is a constitutional issue:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them"
WHO concluded that the issue was "falsely declared"?
 
No, they haven't because the nuclear option is obviously to damned dangerous, except to a business moron, known for taking bankruptcy to protect himself, while his other investors, contractor and supplier, took a bath, getting soaked for their investments.
you know it isn't sustainable and the too damned dangerous is truly doing nothing.
 
WHO concluded that the issue was "falsely declared"?

Anyone with a brain.

What was the basis for this 'Economic Emergency'? The U.S. economy was doing very well:

1744053340648.webp
 
It would be nice to have manufacturing come back here like it once was. :smoke:
Not only nice but its strategic as well... remember how the Chinese held back critical medical supplies during covid... we have to isolate China and show the world the USA is back and open for business....
 
How that is any way in touch with reality?

The US doesn't pay tariffs that other countries implement. Each country pays for their own tariffs. You're as clueless as Trump is.
so you aren't for free trade? you are only for screwing americans, got it. go fking figure.
 
How that is any way in touch with reality?

The US doesn't pay tariffs that other countries implement. Each country pays for their own tariffs. You're as clueless as Trump is.
You made up so many different stories it’s hard to respond

Tariffs make US good more expensive

With me so far?
 
Back
Top Bottom