Are Rich Hollywood, Sports, Music, And Other Celebrities Any Different Than Rich CEO's?

Only if you have less than $967 per month income including retirement and social security. Instead of trying to find ways for the government to pay massively high medical bills, we should limit the uncalled for, outrageous profit that drug companies exact on those who have no choice but to purchase their product.
Maybe you should develop a drug that can compete
 
Only if you have less than $967 per month income including retirement and social security. Instead of trying to find ways for the government to pay massively high medical bills, we should limit the uncalled for, outrageous profit that drug companies exact on those who have no choice but to purchase their product.
Where I live a single person can make between 1700 and 1800 a month and qualify for Medicaid.
 
Now there is why I will never be a right winger. No, I don't expect anybody to pay my medical bills. That is why I have insurance. I don't have a problem with drug companies making a profit. I just see it as unfair for drug companies to make massively excessive profits at the expense of those who have no choice but to pay it. It's kinda like multiplying the price of bottled water after a natural disaster. Unfair and unethical.
So you want price controls? Drug companies only have exclusivity to a drug for 7 yrs so they have to maximize their profits. They spend billions on R&D. What drug do you take that you can’t afford? How much is it?

Something doesn’t add up.
 
So you want price controls? Drug companies only have exclusivity to a drug for 7 yrs so they have to maximize their profits. They spend billions on R&D. What drug do you take that you can’t afford? How much is it?

Something doesn’t add up.

I want "shareholder value" removed from the equation.
 
Your brand of Capitalism isn't working for health care. Besides, you don't even actually support actual Capitalism.
1) It doesn’t because we don’t truly have free markets.

2) Of course I do.

3) I am a lot smarter than you. Don’t ever forget that, little troll.
 
The left are constantly railing against mulit-millionaire and billionaire CEO's, constantly claiming that they got rich off the backs of working people but doesn't that also apply to millionaire and billionaire Hollywood, sports, music, and other celebrities? Don't they get rich off the backs of working people as well? I won't mention any particular names due to recent events but there are several multi-millionaire or billionaire Hollywood, sports, music, and other celebrities who wouldn't be rich but for taking huge sums of money off the backs of working people. Why do they get a pass but company CEO's don't?

The Democrat Party is the party of rich CEO's.
 
Bugger off liar.
You’re an idiot. This was before they sold off their shares. Govt made a profit.

 

Forum List

Back
Top