Are Dems Recruiting Whistle Blowers?

[BULLDOG]

She had every right to do just that. The House represents the people, and the people put the Democrats in charge of it. Quit whining. Trump has every right to answer any impeachment charges during the trial which will be held in the Senate. If Trump doesn't like his crimes being investigated, he shouldn't have done them.

It does not matter which party is in charge neither speaker has the right to be a dictator.
A Formal Inquiry must be voted on and Trump has forced her to give them their voices and go back to the constitution.
Letters are not subpoenas and they don't have to comply.

If you think facts are whining then you have some problems.

Odd that I never heard that from any right winger during all those republican led hearings. I wonder why.
Where in the constitution does it require a vote at this point?

They voted for Inquiry Impeachment for Nixon and Clinton.
Why do they get their constitutional rights and Trump doesn't?

Again, where in the constitution does it say a vote is required at this time? You keep whining about the constitution. I'm just asking for the pertinent part of it concerning that particular House vote. I'll wait.

I am not whining about the constitution.
I'm explaining how it's being violated.
This is not a Formal inquiry and the Dems are sending letters not subpoenas.
Why?
Because they can't till they vote for a formal impeachment on the floor and that vote then gives the power of subpoenas for both Dem's and Repubs.
Dems do not want Repubs to have that power.
Now ask yourself, why Nancy does not want that power for subpoenas.

Who told you they couldn't issue subpoenas? Yes, they are sending a few letters too, but who ever told you they weren't issuing subpoenas as well was lying to you.
House Democrats Issue First Subpoena in Impeachment Inquiry

 

[BULLDOG]

It does not matter which party is in charge neither speaker has the right to be a dictator.
A Formal Inquiry must be voted on and Trump has forced her to give them their voices and go back to the constitution.
Letters are not subpoenas and they don't have to comply.

If you think facts are whining then you have some problems.

Odd that I never heard that from any right winger during all those republican led hearings. I wonder why.
Where in the constitution does it require a vote at this point?

They voted for Inquiry Impeachment for Nixon and Clinton.
Why do they get their constitutional rights and Trump doesn't?

Again, where in the constitution does it say a vote is required at this time? You keep whining about the constitution. I'm just asking for the pertinent part of it concerning that particular House vote. I'll wait.

I am not whining about the constitution.
I'm explaining how it's being violated.
This is not a Formal inquiry and the Dems are sending letters not subpoenas.
Why?
Because they can't till they vote for a formal impeachment on the floor and that vote then gives the power of subpoenas for both Dem's and Repubs.
Dems do not want Repubs to have that power.
Now ask yourself, why Nancy does not want that power for subpoenas.

However; the democrats have the chairs of the committees so they have the power of subpoena. What they have done is lock out republicans from their legal and lawful right to defend Trump. This is being done on purpose to keep trump from mounting a meaningful defense and that will allow democrats to go straight to impeachment by denying due process.

Something these democrats better understand is their position in congress does not alleviate their culpability in criminal misconduct. Denial of due process, under color of law, is a felony and they can be charged.

Democrats aren't locking out repubs. The repubs did that themselves when they changed the rules to allow committee chairmen to control all subpoenas. If you think anyone is being denied due process, then you don't understand due process.

 

[keepitreal]

It sure seems like it. Breitbart says there's another one. Looks like the Dems are playing dirty now.

<< The whistleblower, a career official at the IRS, confirmed in an interview with The Washington Post this week that he had filed a formal complaint and sent it to the tax committee chairs in both houses of Congress, including Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), and to the Treasury Department Inspector General for Tax Administration on July 29. >>

Report: Another ‘Whistleblower' Takes Aim at Trump—This Time from IRS

ROFLMFAO

July 29th

Why Steven Mnuchin is the Treasury Secretary I'll never know

 

[Billy_Bob]

Odd that I never heard that from any right winger during all those republican led hearings. I wonder why.
Where in the constitution does it require a vote at this point?

They voted for Inquiry Impeachment for Nixon and Clinton.
Why do they get their constitutional rights and Trump doesn't?

Again, where in the constitution does it say a vote is required at this time? You keep whining about the constitution. I'm just asking for the pertinent part of it concerning that particular House vote. I'll wait.

I am not whining about the constitution.
I'm explaining how it's being violated.
This is not a Formal inquiry and the Dems are sending letters not subpoenas.
Why?
Because they can't till they vote for a formal impeachment on the floor and that vote then gives the power of subpoenas for both Dem's and Repubs.
Dems do not want Repubs to have that power.
Now ask yourself, why Nancy does not want that power for subpoenas.

However; the democrats have the chairs of the committees so they have the power of subpoena. What they have done is lock out republicans from their legal and lawful right to defend Trump. This is being done on purpose to keep trump from mounting a meaningful defense and that will allow democrats to go straight to impeachment by denying due process.

Something these democrats better understand is their position in congress does not alleviate their culpability in criminal misconduct. Denial of due process, under color of law, is a felony and they can be charged.

Democrats aren't locking out repubs. The repubs did that themselves when they changed the rules to allow committee chairmen to control all subpoenas. If you think anyone is being denied due process, then you don't understand due process.

Partisan LIAR! Democrats have intentionally locked out republicans... And its going to boomerang your asses as Americans are paying attention and they are not as stupid as you think they are.

 

[BULLDOG]

They voted for Inquiry Impeachment for Nixon and Clinton.
Why do they get their constitutional rights and Trump doesn't?

Again, where in the constitution does it say a vote is required at this time? You keep whining about the constitution. I'm just asking for the pertinent part of it concerning that particular House vote. I'll wait.

I am not whining about the constitution.
I'm explaining how it's being violated.
This is not a Formal inquiry and the Dems are sending letters not subpoenas.
Why?
Because they can't till they vote for a formal impeachment on the floor and that vote then gives the power of subpoenas for both Dem's and Repubs.
Dems do not want Repubs to have that power.
Now ask yourself, why Nancy does not want that power for subpoenas.

However; the democrats have the chairs of the committees so they have the power of subpoena. What they have done is lock out republicans from their legal and lawful right to defend Trump. This is being done on purpose to keep trump from mounting a meaningful defense and that will allow democrats to go straight to impeachment by denying due process.

Something these democrats better understand is their position in congress does not alleviate their culpability in criminal misconduct. Denial of due process, under color of law, is a felony and they can be charged.

Democrats aren't locking out repubs. The repubs did that themselves when they changed the rules to allow committee chairmen to control all subpoenas. If you think anyone is being denied due process, then you don't understand due process.

Partisan LIAR! Democrats have intentionally locked out republicans... And its going to boomerang your asses as Americans are paying attention and they are not as stupid as you think they are.

You right wingers are pretty stupid, but how are they locking repubs out? Aren't they going by the rules that repubs put in place?

 

[lennypartiv]

Since draining the swamp now means major repositioning at the FBI and CIA, the president will need all eight years to successfully drain the swamp.

 

[Zorro!]

Whistle blowers are always welcome. Why wouldn't they be?

This one looks like yet another contrived Smear like the Dossier and the Kavanaugh hit jobs.

The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) and the Democrat members' "impeachment investigation."

The Ukrainian investigation of Burisma — the Ukrainian gas company for which Biden interceded while in office, and where Hunter Biden had a very well paid sinecure — started long before Trump's controversial call; the President of Ukraine has said on the record he didn't feel he was pressured at all by Trump's call; and that Biden admitted on video using aid to Ukraine to pressure the then-government to fire the prosecutor that was investigating the company.

• The first whistleblower (WB1) had an issue with what s/he heard about (not heard directly) the Trump phone call to the president of Ukraine and felt Trump was out of bounds for asking Ukraine to investigate Crowdstrike and Biden-family graft.
  
• WB1 then notified Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee. House members, including both Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi, started revealing parts of WB1's complaint before it had been filed with the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG).
  
• Violating House rules, the Democrats on the committee did not share the information with the Republicans on the committee.
  
• When WB1's complaint was actually filed, it was a well-written legal brief that had no part that was first-hand knowledge, and even referenced press coverage.
  
• The direction given by the ICIG's office, that whistleblower complaints must be based on first-hand information, was rescinded enabling the second-hand WB1 complaint to be considered. This rescission happened in September but was backdated to August.
  
• WB1's complaint has a number of factual errors.
  
• After the Democrats demanded the release of the transcript, Trump declassified the transcript, upon which the demands were changed to releasing WB1's complaint. Which Trump also did.
  
• The House Democrats refuse to make public WB1's name, but the ICIG testified that the complaint was questionable because WB1 was not just a registered Democrat but was professionally associated with a current Democrat's 2020 campaign.

Second-hand information, factual errors, backdated changes in guidance, questionable sourcing, and a suspiciously back-door — and potentially illegal — contact with the HSPCI majority before the complaint was filed, violating House rules.

Trump's declassification put WB1 in a bad light: the actual call transcript doesn't fit the WB1 narrative, and the complaint itself has a lot of political input.

The Democrats' questionable process includes the irregular contacts with WB1 before the complaint was filed, and the violation of House rules by not notifying the Republican minority. Then secondly, hearing testimony from the ICIG and from former Ambassador Kurt Volker, with the Democrats leaking selected parts of the testimony but refusing to make the testimony public.

The leaked Volker testimony supports Trump's contention that there was nothing unusual about the call.

Who Does the Whistleblower Know?

 

[Dana7360]

It sure seems like it. Breitbart says there's another one. Looks like the Dems are playing dirty now.

<< The whistleblower, a career official at the IRS, confirmed in an interview with The Washington Post this week that he had filed a formal complaint and sent it to the tax committee chairs in both houses of Congress, including Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), and to the Treasury Department Inspector General for Tax Administration on July 29. >>

Report: Another ‘Whistleblower' Takes Aim at Trump—This Time from IRS

This isn't new. In fact this is actually the first whistleblower before the one about the Ukraine phone call. The Ukraine mess started around the end of September.

This report is from August 21.

Dems cite whistleblower claim of possible improper 'influence' in Trump tax audit

This one is from Politico published the day before:

House Democrats say whistleblower bolsters case for getting Trump's tax returns

You need to get your news from a variety of sources that aren't far right wing.

 

[lennypartiv]

This isn't new. In fact this is actually the first whistleblower before the one about the Ukraine phone call. The Ukraine mess started around the end of September.
This report is from August 21.
Dems cite whistleblower claim of possible improper 'influence' in Trump tax audit
This one is from Politico published the day before:
House Democrats say whistleblower bolsters case for getting Trump's tax returns
You need to get your news from a variety of sources that aren't far right wing.

The Dems have recruited THREE whistleblowers so far. Why? This shows how desperate the Dems are.

 

[Dana7360]

This isn't new. In fact this is actually the first whistleblower before the one about the Ukraine phone call. The Ukraine mess started around the end of September.
This report is from August 21.
Dems cite whistleblower claim of possible improper 'influence' in Trump tax audit
This one is from Politico published the day before:
House Democrats say whistleblower bolsters case for getting Trump's tax returns
You need to get your news from a variety of sources that aren't far right wing.

The Dems have recruited THREE whistleblowers so far. Why? This shows how desperate the Dems are.

Sure keep telling yourself that. I'm sure it will keep you warm when things start hitting the fan for trump.

 

[lennypartiv]

Sure keep telling yourself that. I'm sure it will keep you warm when things start hitting the fan for trump.

Impeachment will never happen, Barr and McConnell will make sure of that.

 

[Lesh]

Billy the Bagman and Moscow Mitch?

They'll try...

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It sure seems like it. Breitbart says there's another one. Looks like the Dems are playing dirty now.

<< The whistleblower, a career official at the IRS, confirmed in an interview with The Washington Post this week that he had filed a formal complaint and sent it to the tax committee chairs in both houses of Congress, including Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), and to the Treasury Department Inspector General for Tax Administration on July 29. >>

Report: Another ‘Whistleblower' Takes Aim at Trump—This Time from IRS

Didn't you know that the democrats were behind the whistleblowers? Those whistleblowers were paid.
Ukraine whistleblower’s lawyers work for group that offers to pay officials who leak against Trump

 

[lennypartiv]

Billy the Bagman and Moscow Mitch?
They'll try...

McConnell has already made campaign promises about it on the campaign trail.

 

[Zorro!]

 

[Zorro!]

It sure seems like it. Breitbart says there's another one. Looks like the Dems are playing dirty now.

<< The whistleblower, a career official at the IRS, confirmed in an interview with The Washington Post this week that he had filed a formal complaint and sent it to the tax committee chairs in both houses of Congress, including Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), and to the Treasury Department Inspector General for Tax Administration on July 29. >>

Report: Another ‘Whistleblower' Takes Aim at Trump—This Time from IRS

They have been playing dirty against Trump since the Primaries.

Brennan's Spy: New Theories Emerge About Trump-Ukraine Whistleblower

"He’s there to do the dirty work of the deep state..."

Adam Schiff's "star witness" Alex Vindman had to be reprimanded by his superior for "inappropriate and partisan behavior in the military"

He's been a lifelong, partisan operative.

Wall St. Journal columnist Holman W. Jenkins, Jr., bluntly describes the fundamental flaw with the impeachment push; the Bidens appear to have engaged in something in Ukraine worth looking into - while Congressional Democrats and their MSM messengers destroyed their own credibility over Russiagate.

Mr. Biden can claim he was uninfluenced by his son’s employment. But his staff knew about the job. The Ukrainians knew. America’s European allies knew. The World Bank and International Monetary Fund knew. All knew that Burisma had to be pussyfooted around to avoid causing a scandal for Mr. Biden that might mess up the Obama administration’s ability to sustain support for the shaky regime.​

This is what made Hunter Biden worth the money Burisma paid him to sit on its board between April 2014 and April 2019. And whatever the reason for firing prosecutor Viktor Shokin, it was decidedly not with the goal of making trouble for Burisma.​

Which brings us to the Achilles’ heel of this impeachment if the goal is to bring along a broad public: Democrats’ and the media’s astonishing and studied obliviousness to the bonfire they made of their own credibility with the Russia hoax. Even many Trump-skeptical voters have no interest in giving victory to so corrupt an opposition. -WSJ​

Ciaramella's rise within the Obama administration intelligence community, remains in The Trump Administration as a spy:

"He’s lurking in there in the West Wing as an Obama holdover. A spy for John Brennan, and he’s there to do the dirty work of the deep state." -Rush Limbaugh​

Sharyl Attkisson wrote in response to 'outing' of Ciaramella, " It implies the "whistleblower" could have been worried Trump was getting close to uncovering Democrat links to Ukraine’s interference in US elections in 2016."

If Ciaramella was a deep-state spy in the West Wing, former FBI employees Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are potentially involved - as pieced together by Fox News contributor and former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino, who starts with an April 25 letter from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Johnson (R-WI) to Attorney General William Barr asking about cryptic text messages between Strzok and Page in which they discuss someone named "Charlie" who may be "the CI guy."

Bongino posits that Strzok and Page may be talking about Ciaramella being a "Confidential Informant" (CI), or spy - and notes that Paul Sperry may have dropped a hint in the way he included a "pronunciation note" regarding the whistleblower's name (pronounced char-a-MEL-ah) may have referred to "Charlie" in the Strzok/Page texts.

Perhaps we'll find out more about Ciaramella from John Durham, the prosecutor appointed by Barr to investigate the origins of the "Russiagate" counterintelligence operation against the Trump campaign. As Rush Limbaugh puts it, this is a race between impeachment and a Durham indictment.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Whistle blowers are always welcome. Why wouldn't they be?

If they are planted and /or manufactured, then, No, a whistleblower should not be welcome. Liberals will disagree with this.

 

[Zorro!]

It sure seems like it. Breitbart says there's another one. Looks like the Dems are playing dirty now.

<< The whistleblower, a career official at the IRS, confirmed in an interview with The Washington Post this week that he had filed a formal complaint and sent it to the tax committee chairs in both houses of Congress, including Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), and to the Treasury Department Inspector General for Tax Administration on July 29. >>

Report: Another ‘Whistleblower' Takes Aim at Trump—This Time from IRS

Didn't you know that the democrats were behind the whistleblowers? Those whistleblowers were paid.
Ukraine whistleblower’s lawyers work for group that offers to pay officials who leak against Trump

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Anti-Trump CIA ‘Whistleblower’ in Ukraine Hoax Was the Leaker in the Russia Hoax!…

The leaker in the Ukraine Hoax is also a key contributor to the Russia Hoax. His seditious actions began after he worked with the Bidens in the Ukraine during the Obama Administration.

 

[The Original Tree]

Not only are they doing that and encouraging people to submit fraudulent reports and commit perjury, they are constantly generating Fake News and Fake so called New Evidence to try to pressure The Senate to call witnesses and tie up The Senate and Supreme Court all the way through The Primaries and beyond.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Whistle blowers are always welcome. Why wouldn't they be?

Why do you attack trump when he does it

Trump isn't a whistle blower. He's more of a big bag of hot air. His claims aren't credible either.-----he lies too much to be believable

So far his claims have more credibility than these whistleblowers from the left Lol

Can you say "birth certificate"?

Probably most dem babies never see a birth certificate