It is a simple fact of history that for almost all of their sorry existence on this planet, Christians have been wickedly, monstrously, murderously intolerant.
In modern times, since most of the levers of political power have, with great difficulty, been wrenched from their fanatical claws, there are, indeed, Christians who are not intolerant, and against all the odds, some of them are even admirable.
But this would quickly change if they ever did regain their lost political power. It is in the nature of a fanatical creed, that vainly imagines that it has the only truth, to become corrupted, and all through history there has been no lack of evil scoundrels who have gained satanic power by manipulating the zealotry of an exclusive religion.
The only times in history that Christians have been Meek and Mild is when they have been politically powerless. Let them remain so, for the sake of their souls. There can be no doubt that power would, once again, release the demonic tendencies in their religion.
Really Gracie? Christ was put to DEATH for being intolerant despite his preaching WAS tolerance aka 'Turning the other cheek'?
And what does that have to do with the way his followers have actually behaved?
"By their fruits ye shall know them"
Did you only recently learn the English language? You seem to have some difficulty understanding past and present tenses.
I clearly stated that when Christians do not inject their religion into politics, they can be admirable. And, in the past, whenever they possessed political power, they became monsters.
Islam, being another intolerant monotheistic religion, demonstrates the same repulsive tendencies as does Christianity. Due to the political backwardness in the Middle East, religion is still interwoven with politics, and Islam today displays the same evil tendencies as Christianity did a few short decades or centuries ago.
If and when Islam is divorced from politics, I would expect it to become as relatively benign as Christianity often is today.
However, if you go back a few short centuries, the present situation was quite reversed, and Islam was far more tolerant than the murderously barbaric Christians of Europe.
Though they suffered some legal disabilities, both Christians and Jews were accorded much more freedom and respect in the Islamic world than non-believers -- or even heretics -- experienced in the Christian West.
An instructive example is provided by the researches of the Moslem traveller and historian Ibn-Batuta. He travelled far more widely than anybody else in the mediaeval world (including Marco Polo) and was zealous in his researches. But he never visited the Christian West, because he knew the Europeans were savages who would surely kill him. Unlike the relative security Christians and Jews enjoyed in the Islamic world, any Moslem foolish enough to venture into the benighted realms of the Christians could only expect arrest, torture and execution. For centuries, the only Moslems who ever went to Europe, and lived to tell about it, were physicians, diplomats, businessmen and others who were protected by royal favor and patronage.
.