Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?

The clock is ticking, only 3 years, 11 months, 29 days, 23 hours, 55 minutes remaining in the Trump PRESIDENCY.
Yes. Time is needed to correct the disasters of Biden and democrats.

A flurry of EO's by Trump will start the process.
 
Would you allow one of your students to get away with such a lame answer?
Art Carney was a Conservative and his grandson was a Republican member of the Connecticut State House.

Good dude, that Norton.
 
Yes. Time is needed to correct the disasters of Biden and democrats.
Trump said it would be very quick and very easy.

I'm sure you knew that was a lie when he said it, not that you'll ever admit it.
 
Now he pardoned Fauci and Milley. Pardoned from what? When have these people ever been convicted and sentenced for any crimes?

Biden pardons Fauci and Milley in an effort to guard against potential ‘revenge’ by Trump​


"WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden has pardoned Dr. Anthony Fauci, retired Gen. Mark Milley and members of the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, using the extraordinary powers of his office in his final hours to guard against potential “revenge” by the incoming Trump administration.

The decision by Biden comes after Donald Trump warned of an enemies list filled with those who have crossed him politically or sought to hold him accountable for his attempt to overturn his 2020 election loss and his role in the storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Trump has selected Cabinet nominees who backed his election lies and who have pledged to punish those involved in efforts to investigate him.

“The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense,” Biden said in a statement. “Our nation owes these public servants a debt of gratitude for their tireless commitment to our country.”

It’s customary for a president to grant clemency at the end of his term, but those acts of mercy are usually offered to everyday Americans who have been convicted of crimes. But Biden has used the power in the broadest and most untested way possible: to pardon those who have not even been investigated yet. And with the acceptance comes a tacit admission of guilt or wrongdoing, even though those who have been pardoned have not been formally accused of any crimes."

https://wgno.com/news/health/ap-bid...-to-guard-against-potential-revenge-by-trump/
There should be no such thing as pre-emptive or blanket pardons. How utterly ridiuclous. Any Pardon should not only be for a specific conviction already on the books but pardons should have another unbiased approval source other than just one person, except when it comes to turkeys.
 
Trump said it would be very quick and very easy.

I'm sure you knew that was a lie when he said it, not that you'll ever admit it.
Millions of criminal illegals won't be an easy fix. When did Trump say it would be a quick and easy fix?
 
I never repeated your arguments. That's a nonsense claim. Biden has granted a sweeping, retroactive pardon for his kid and insists that is legal. There's no reason he couldn't try and grant a Pre-emptive pardon before today's inauguration is finished.
Tell me your definition of pre-emptive in your words, because I think you are using the term incorrectly.

Hunter's pardons did not specify the crimes.
 
Well, now they can't!

Also, would you tell us what a military tribunal is and what its purpose is? I don't think you understand it correctly.

In regard to Fauci, didn't that turn out to be true?
Treason for Miley and Yes Fauci did say that!
 
Tell me your definition of pre-emptive in your words, because I think you are using the term incorrectly.

Hunter's pardons did not specify the crimes.
As Biden applied sweeping pardons for his kid extending back a decade or so, I had expected he would attempt to try and apply a pardon extending a decade Into the future.

And no. The pardon for Hunter Biden did not specify a crime. That was intentional as a means to shield him from crimes "to be named in the
Future".


 
No one wanted to review that one, but I have a feeling people will want to review this one.

The SC already said they can look into things like this going back to Marbury vs. Madison.
Pardons cannot be reviewed by anyone as the President has plenary power to grant pardons. There is no constitutional provision for review.
 
a7fe41da7d9eadee9db76dbff64c0833_768x0.png
 
Tell me your definition of pre-emptive in your words, because I think you are using the term incorrectly.

Hunter's pardons did not specify the crimes.
It was used to prevent the prosecution of crimes committed but not yet charged, moron.
 
As Biden applied sweeping pardons for his kid extending back a decade or so, I had expected he would attempt to try and apply a pardon extending a decade Into the future.

And no. The pardon for Hunter Biden did not specify a crime. That was intentional as a means to shield him from crimes "to be named in the
Future".


So? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

You are ASSUMING, which is something the law does not allow.
 
There should be no such thing as pre-emptive or blanket pardons. How utterly ridiuclous. Any Pardon should not only be for a specific conviction already on the books but pardons should have another unbiased approval source other than just one person, except when it comes to turkeys.
Evidently, there is
 
You are pissed because Fauci told the truth? Miley maybe conspired to possible commit treason without actually doing it. There is a difference.
Fauci lied about funding the Fauci Flu at Wuhan.

Fauci lied about the vaccine.

Fauci lied about masks.

Fauci lied about social distancing.

Not much he didn’t lie about, idiot.

Oh, and conspiring to commit treason is a felony.

Holy shit you are stupid.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom