Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?

[Mr. Friscus]

Prove it.

All your attempts failed miserably, were thrown out, or involved proudly biased prosecutors who pledged to get Trump… nobody believes any of them Would have been brought if the target wasn’t Donald Trump. This isn’t even in dispute.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The offenses are named. They’re named any and all.

What’s confusing about that?

GASLIGHT THEATRE

 

[SweetSue92]

The President ... shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of impeachment.

No. It does not! The word does not appear in the Constitution. Sorry!

That's fine, if they're pardoned they waive their right to plead the fifth

 

[Hollie]

The offenses are named. They’re named any and all.

What’s confusing about that?

Show me where that is identified in the Constitution.

Any and all is broad and sweeping. Not specific.

 

[toobfreak]

Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?​

I think he is up to around 4000 now. He waited until his very last hours to pardon Fauci, Cheney, Milley and Kinzinger.
Has any other president ever pardoned people who have not been charged with much less convicted of any crime to be pardoned from?
The DOJ declared Biden incompetent to stand trial for his stolen documents; this makes him incompetent to hold office and should render all pardons of his illegal and null and void.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Well, that proves it.

The J6 committee was a complete corrupt witch hunt.

These evil people ruined the lives of thousands of people just because Donald Trump is NOT corrupt.

You lefties should be concerned. The leaders of the revolutions always fuck over the soldiers once they get power.

 

[irosie91]

That's fine, if they're pardoned they waive their right to plead the fifth

really, SUSIE? I did not know that

 

[Marener]

Trump was the only one prosecuted for doing it, other Presidents took things like this with them with nary a peep.

Which president?

Being President gives you power over those laws, because you are the one designated to execute them

Trump wasn’t president when he had those documents. He wasn’t in charge of anything.

Once again leftists show they want power held by unelected bureaucrats and not the elected President

So you’re back to arguing the president can tell the DoJ to prosecute his enemies and not the “unelected bureaucrats”. Seems like a bad thing to me.

 

[Marener]

All your attempts failed miserably, were thrown out, or involved proudly biased prosecutors who pledged to get Trump… nobody believes any of them Would have been brought if the target wasn’t Donald Trump. This isn’t even in dispute.

That has nothing to do with what you claimed.

 

[martybegan]

Which president?

Trump wasn’t president when he had those documents. He wasn’t in charge of anything.

So you’re back to arguing the president can tell the DoJ to prosecute his enemies and not the “unelected bureaucrats”. Seems like a bad thing to me.

He was president when he was given them.

How do you prosecute him for having classified documents when they were classified under his authority?

 

[Marener]

Show me where that is identified in the Constitution.

Any and all is broad and sweeping. Not specific.

Constitution says nothing about being specific.

I suppose Biden could have made a list of every crime in the USC and put that in the pardon but thar seems unnecessary.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

That has nothing to do with what you claimed.

Sure it does. The justice system was weaponized. You said that was impossible until 5 seconds ago, did a full 180, and now say it’s possible and have to pardon all your cronies to protect them.

LOL. You have to be stupid to not expect people to notice

 

[Marener]

He was president when he was given them.

How do you prosecute him for having classified documents when they were classified under his authority?

Again, he has no authority once he leaves office. He’s just a dude. A dude who is not legally allowed to possess classified documents.

You prosecute him because he’s a dude breaking the law.

 

[SweetSue92]

really, SUSIE? I did not know that

Yes, Congress can subpoena any of these clowns to testify now; they do not have fifth amendment protection

Hunter Biden faces potential 5th Amendment headache after pardon

"Hunter Biden no longer enjoys the right to assert his 5th Amendment Right against self incrimination," one defense lawyer wrote.

www.newsweek.com

 

[Marener]

The justice system was weaponized.

Says who?

 

[martybegan]

Again, he has no authority once he leaves office. He’s just a dude. A dude who is not legally allowed to possess classified documents.

You prosecute him because he’s a dude breaking the law.

He still has his security clearance, and they were classified under his watch. Again, questions that never had to be asked before, because it was never a problem when other Presidents did it. And of course there is no evidence of that because no one fucking cared enough to look into it.

Only Trump drives the deep staters to this level of scrutiny, not because of any noble intent, because they needed to "Get Trump"

And it blew up in their faces, all of it. every single attack by them just made more people realize the system was out to get Trump.

 

[Rawley]

How very fascist that you think you can declare a former presidents actions to be void.

we've never had a President so mentally compromised issue so many preemptive pardons.

 

[Rawley]

Says who?

All rational people.

 

[Hollie]

Constitution says nothing about being specific.

I suppose Biden could have made a list of every crime in the USC and put that in the pardon but thar seems unnecessary.

The Constitution does say "offenses". Nothing about retroactive offenses not charged with or to be identified at a later date.

Biden didn't make a list because that would be a limitation on the kinds of offenses he was a party to and could be charged as a principal or accessory to.

 

[irosie91]

Says who?

people like me-----and NOT JUST FOR TRUMP