Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

/----/ I think Trump's DOJ will see if these pardons pass muster. Even if they do, they all can be called to Congress to testify under oath. If they purjur themselves, the pardon won't help them

purjur? Is that when cat's lie? Or is that purrjur?

 

[Marener]

That's fine, if they're pardoned they waive their right to plead the fifth

Nope. They can still plead the fifth.

 

[Hollie]

Sucks. doesn't it? Nothing you can do about it.

Sucks for you. Yet another confirmation of the sleazy legacy of Biden and democrats.

 

[SweetTea]

Sucks. doesn't it? Nothing you can do about it.

Why are you happy that potential treasonous individuals won't have to pay a price?

 

[Hollie]

Exactly! It's right there in front of your face, you have stated it, but still don't believe it! What does that say about your thought processes?

Exactly "offenses". You can try and hide from your ignorance. Offenses would be known and adjudicated.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

SCOTUS DOES!!!!

Not for pardons! Try again.

 

[Hollie]

Why are you happy that potential treasonous individuals won't have to pay a price?

He is fine with protecting sleazy, treasonous democrats.

 

[Marener]

Oh they more than likely did, but back then no one cared.

They were packed up for him and given to him when he left the White House.

No one cares what a delusional hack like yourself thinks is "likely".

Trump was personally involved in packing those boxes with his aides.

Marty, you're just making shit up now and you know it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why are you happy that potential treasonous individuals won't have to pay a price?

Who said I was happy? You need to look up the definition of treason again, FYI.

 

[SweetTea]

Sucks for you. Yet another conformation of the sleazy legacy of Biden and democrats.

Democrats obviously couldn't care less. They just want what they want. Legal or illegal makes no difference to them. They are spoiled children who were never disciplined and believe they can do whatever they want without repercussions. Throwing tantrums is also acceptable when necessary.

 

[SweetTea]

Who said I was happy? You need to look up the definition of treason again, FYI.

It doesn't seem to bother you.

Yes, treason.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

He is fine with protecting sleazy, treasonous democrats.

Nope. I want the same power reserved for conservatives also.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Exactly "offenses". You can try and hide from your ignorance. Offenses would be known and adjudicated.

Where does it say that? Nixon was pardoned for unnamed offenses.

 

[martybegan]

No one cares what a delusional hack like yourself thinks is "likely".

Trump was personally involved in packing those boxes with his aides.

Marty, you're just making shit up now and you know it.

LOL, I though Trump was too fat and old to do things like that.

It's pathetic how much your spin contradicts itself.

This was an archives issue that Dems blew up into a National Security "issue" that then blew up in their face, like all the other lawfare.

And the end Result is happening in about an hour.

Tick Tok, Tick Tok bitch.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It doesn't seem to bother you.

Yes, treason.

What is the constitutional definition of treason?

 

[Hollie]

Nope. I want the same power reserved for conservatives also.

Nonsense. You're failing your pom poms because you are convinced Biden and democrats got away with their sleaze and corruption.

 

[Marener]

LOL, I though Trump was too fat and old to do things like that.

He's old and fat, but I don't know who told you that he couldn't rifle through a filing box. I never said so.

It's pathetic how much your spin contradicts itself.

What's pathetic is that you think you have a gotcha here.

This was an archives issue that Dems blew up into a National Security "issue" that then blew up in their face, like all the other lawfare.

Mishandling classified documents is a national security issue. Obviously.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Identify where the Constitution provides the ability of a president to grant pardons retroactively for offenses that might or might not have occurred.

The Constitution grants the president the ability to grant pardons for Offenses.

However, where does it specify those offenses have to be specified and as to when they occurred. It doesn't, leaving the discretion to the President.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Says who?

Who says Trump would weaponize it?

Yet your president is acting on it

 

[Marener]

Who says Trump would weaponize it?

He already did the first time around.

Yet your president is acting on it

Says who? Just saying he did doesn't make it true.