Are all of Biden’s pardons that were autopenned signed INVALID?

[Marener]

Yet you do it often when running from questions that you're afraid of.

Irrelevant questions are irrelevant. There doesn’t need to be a precedent for something to be constitutional. Asking for a precedent is irrelevant.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That's correct. The Nixon excuse is WEAK defending these GRANTS OF IMMUNITY.

They are pardons. Read the paperwork. These "GRANTS of IMMUNITY" are figments of your imagination.

 

[buckeye]

He wrote it. What else needs to be done?

Oh, I don't know. Like actually sign an official document? Take Biden's decision to court? I can assure you that a Truth Social post can't revoke a presidential pardon from another president.

How do you actually stay alive? You don't seem to have much ability to think.

 

[Marener]

Oh, I don't know. Like actually sign an official document? Take Biden's decision to court? I can assure you that a Truth Social post can't revoke a presidential pardon from another president.

How do you actually stay alive? You don't seem to have much ability to think.

Does he have to sign an official document to declassify documents?

 

[buckeye]

You’ve been running away from this question the entire thread.

Now you add lying to your resume.

 

[SeaMajor7]

They are pardons. Read the paperwork. These "GRANTS of IMMUNITY" are figments of your imagination.

What are the crimes against the United States, skipper, that are being pardoned?

 

[Marener]

Now you add lying to your resume.

Nope.

What do you think a preemptive pardon is?

 

[buckeye]

He was not pardoned for personal crimes. He was pardoned for crimes against the United States. Murder is an against an individual. There is a difference.

Murder can absolutely be a crime against the United States.

If, however, the victim is a federal official, an ambassador, consul, or other foreign official under the protection of the United States, or if the crime took place on federal property or involved crossing state borders, or in a manner that substantially affects interstate commerce or national security, then the federal government also has jurisdiction. If a crime is not committed within any state, then federal jurisdiction is exclusive, for example vessels of the U.S. Navy or the U.S. Merchant Marine in international waters and U.S. military bases worldwide. Recently, the Supreme Court, in the McGirt decision, reaffirmed that major crimes within the reservation boundaries of Native American tribes, for which a tribal member is suspected, must be investigated and prosecuted by the federal, not state, government. Federal penalties will apply if found guilty.

Murder in United States law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[buckeye]

Why can’t he? He thinks he has the power to do all sorts of things just by thinking it. Like declassifying documents.

What do you think he has to do to revoke a pardon?

I'm quite certain revoking a pardon has nothing to do with social media posts.

 

[Marener]

I'm quite certain revoking a pardon has nothing to do with social media posts.

Why not?

 

[buckeye]

Irrelevant questions are irrelevant. There doesn’t need to be a precedent for something to be constitutional. Asking for a precedent is irrelevant.

I never asked for a precedent, goofy. I asked what "offenses", as you called them, Biden was pardoning Liz Cheney, Adam Schiff and James Biden for.

You ignored this question, as well as others on the same line of thinking, because they scare you.

 

[buckeye]

They are pardons. Read the paperwork. These "GRANTS of IMMUNITY" are figments of your imagination.

When you're not defining the crimes and simply cover all behavior by an individual for a defined length of time, you're granting immunity.

And I don't care what you call it.

 

[ThisIsMe]

The Nixon pardon was for any and all known and unknown, that he committed or may have committed.

“Now, Therefore, I, Gerald R. Ford, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974.”

See i think that goes against the spirit of the cotus. You shouldn't be able to blanket pardon someone for unknown crimes. What if that person had committed some serious crimes during that time.

Still, that's the one time I can think of where this was used. Certainly not "all the time"

 

[Marener]

I never asked for a precedent, goofy. I asked what "offenses", as you called them, Biden was pardoning Liz Cheney, Adam Schiff and James Biden for.

You ignored this question because it scares you.

You asked what offenses they committed. It’s a phony question because I never said they committed any offenses.

If you want to ask what he pardoned them for, the answer was given to other people. The answer is any and all offenses.

Now that I answered your question, tell me if the president has to sign official documents to declassify information.

 

[WEATHER53]

So he never issued all these pardons. Someone else forged for him and he knew nothing about it

 

[buckeye]

Does he have to sign an official document to declassify documents?

I don't know. What does that have to do with revoking a pardon from a prior POTUS?

 

[Marener]

See i think that goes against the spirit of the cotus. You shouldn't be able to blanket pardon someone for unknown crimes. What if that person had committed some serious crimes during that time.

Still, that's the one time I can think of where this was used. Certainly not "all the time"

That’s a risk you take by giving a pardon. It the authors wanted to constrain the pardon, they could have.

Your opinion about what the pardon should be doesn’t change what the constitution says.

 

[Marener]

I don't know. What does that have to do with revoking a pardon from a prior POTUS?

Trump thinks he can. Do we at least agree on that?

 

[buckeye]

Nope.

You're a liar. Exactly once I told you I would answer your quesiton when you started answering mine. You've run from about 8-10 questions

Why do democrats lie so much? Its constant with you people.

I think I've had enough of you. I hate liars.

 

[Marener]

You're a liar. Exactly once I told you I would answer your quesiton when you started answering mine. You've run from about 8-10 questions

Why do democrats lie so much? Its constant with you people.

I think I've had enough of you. I hate liars.

I’ve answered any honest question. Sometimes you ask dishonest questions.

You’re running away because you’re losing. I hate losers.