Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

Liar

The claim was that Russia agrees Co2 is the cause of climate change.

The link proves Putin does not agree with that.

It proves YOU WRONG....
You are a weirdo. I said Russia signed on the cc. You said Putin.....
You are foolish. Even Russia has a literate science. Department
Liar

The claim was that Russia agrees Co2 is the cause of climate change.

The link proves Putin does not agree with that.

It proves YOU WRONG....
You're an embarrassment to the idiots of this world.
Russia signed on to the Paris accord

You are an 8 year old who someone let’s out at night with access to computer.
 
which Putin parrots...

LOL!!!





Your claim is that Russia believes in the Co2 fraud. Putin himself disputed that over and over....

Who speaks for Russia?

A: Putin
More lies.
 


The article has an NBC slant, that the DATA doesn't matter, and doesn't question the laughable bullshit used to fudge the data.


The satellites and balloons, the two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, both showed no warming with high correlation. Co2 went up, temps in the atmosphere did not. Then they fudged.

FUDGING EXCUSES

orbit wobble - laughable - small changes in orbit wouldn't change the IR readings at all

"Shade issues" that were constant the whole time - might justify a one time constant adjustment, but would not change a FLAT LINE into an upward slope.


This is the entire Co2 FRAUD in a nutshell, they NEVER HAD ANY EVIDENCE Co2 CAUSES WARMING and HAD TO FUDGE THAT and THEIR FUDGE IS LAUGHABLE BULLSHIT


 
Which satellite band do we use as a proxy for temperature? ... there's only 16 these days ...


IR

They are IR satellites.

Are you able to explain a map of the Arctic yet....
 
IR

They are IR satellites.

Are you able to explain a map of the Arctic yet....

14 of the 16 satellite bands are in the IR part of the spectrum ... the other two are in the red and blue ... respectively ...

Which band are you using as a proxy for temperature? ...
 
14 of the 16 satellite bands are in the IR part of the spectrum ... the other two are in the red and blue ... respectively ...

Which band are you using as a proxy for temperature? ...


This delusion of yours that somehow EMH is in possession of the data is truly worthy of a trip to the shrink...


YOUR THEORY is that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric warming

The DATA, the two and only two sources of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, read NO WARMING despite rising Co2.

Per actual science, your theory is REJECTED by THE DATA


and once again you will ask for the actual data, because you cannot refute both the truth of the data or defend the laughable fudge job your taxpayer funded heroes put on the American people...


 
This delusion of yours that somehow EMH is in possession of the data ...

Sad part is no data exists ... not from satellites ... and balloon data from my local radiosonde site shows temperatures roughly equivalent to NOAA's global data ...

My theory is based on hydrostatic equilibrium ... which herself is based on the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics ... built right in as it were, leaving me only the energy equalities to cipher out ... and scientists have already worked that problem out and call it the "adiabatic lapse rate" ... the thin red lines on this Radiosonde Chart ...

No data .. what a moroon ...
 
Sad part is no data exists ... not from satellites ... and balloon data from my local radiosonde site shows temperatures roughly equivalent to NOAA's global data ...

My theory is based on hydrostatic equilibrium ... which herself is based on the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics ... built right in as it were, leaving me only the energy equalities to cipher out ... and scientists have already worked that problem out and call it the "adiabatic lapse rate" ... the thin red lines on this Radiosonde Chart ...

No data .. what a moroon ...


YOU have NOTHING. YOU have FUDGE and FRAUD. The DATA showed NO WARMING. YOUR SIDE FUDGED IT.

Meanwhile, Earth continues to not warm at all, and your heroes are deliberately misdiagnosing the fires as you troll about HISTORICAL TRUTH posted and linked over and over...
 
YOU have NOTHING. YOU have FUDGE and FRAUD. The DATA showed NO WARMING. YOUR SIDE FUDGED IT.

Meanwhile, Earth continues to not warm at all, and your heroes are deliberately misdiagnosing the fires as you troll about HISTORICAL TRUTH posted and linked over and over...

What data? ... now you're lying ... satellites don't read temperatures or they'd read -225ºC ... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...

Just making this up as you go ...
... somehow EMH is in possession of the data ...

You're not, so quit claiming you are ... STUPID ...
 
What data? ... now you're lying ... satellites don't read temperatures or they'd read -225ºC ... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...

Just making this up as you go ...


You're not, so quit claiming you are ... STUPID ...



LOL....


Theory - increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric warming

DATA - 2 and only 2 sources, satellites and balloons.

Both showed NO WARMING despite rising Co2 - THEORY REJECTED


Documented by NBC, although laughably slanted...
 
A glacial period (alternatively glacial or glaciation) is an interval of time (thousands of years) within an ice age that is marked by colder temperatures and glacier advances. Interglacials, on the other hand, are periods of warmer climate between glacial periods. The Last Glacial Period ended about 15,000 years ago.

 
Which satellite band are you using as a proxy for temperature? ...
Why is there a cusp in the balloon data? ...


LOL!!!

Still cannot explain a map of the Arctic, how pathetic...
 
A glacial period (alternatively glacial or glaciation) is an interval of time (thousands of years) within an ice age that is marked by colder temperatures and glacier advances. Interglacials, on the other hand, are periods of warmer climate between glacial periods. The Last Glacial Period ended about 15,000 years ago.



And the "glacial period" is part of McBullshit, which means you must agree that Antarctica was still on the South Pole 90 million years ago....

LOL!!!


That the American taxpayer paid for McBullshit is outrageous. None of McBullshit is true...
 

What is an ice age?

An ice age is a long interval of time (millions to tens of millions of years) when global temperatures are relatively cold and large areas of the Earth are covered by continental ice sheets and alpine glaciers. Within an ice age are multiple shorter-term periods of warmer temperatures when glaciers retreat (called interglacials or interglacial cycles) and colder temperatures when glaciers advance (called glacials or glacial cycles).

 
Back in reality, the radiosonde data (balloon data) tracks the surface temps closely. That is, the balloon data shows the warming, and the tropospheric hotspot.

EMH is just living in a world o' delusion. His bad talking point was debunked in 2005.


Naturally, he now claims that anyone doing good science and correcting known errors is fudging data, because that's what cultists do. EMH, please proceed. You've been pushing that conspiracy for 18 years now, so don't stop now.
 

What is an ice age?

An ice age is a long interval of time (millions to tens of millions of years) when global temperatures are relatively cold and large areas of the Earth are covered by continental ice sheets and alpine glaciers. Within an ice age are multiple shorter-term periods of warmer temperatures when glaciers retreat (called interglacials or interglacial cycles) and colder temperatures when glaciers advance (called glacials or glacial cycles).



This definition is blown away by the INCONVENIENT TRUTH that

GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED
 

Forum List

Back
Top