Synthaholic
Diamond Member
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Well... Your avatar makes sense now. That ruling was actually against what it was she was going for.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Well... Your avatar makes sense now. That ruling was actually against what it was she was going for.
Speak English moron. What was AOC “going for”?
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Well... Your avatar makes sense now. That ruling was actually against what it was she was going for.
Speak English moron. What was AOC “going for”?
*blink*blink*
If you don't know, why in the hell do you have her as a picture on your avatar?
Frankly I prefer you just a clueless as she is if you are going to call me names for your ignorance. Figure it out yourself.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
I think you have this wrong you had better check again......this is a good thing for Trump....he can't have his states stolen from him....dummy....read before you post....LMAO
If the college has the right to overrule the people, what is the purpose of people voting in the first placeThe decision appears to be unanimous with two concurring opinions. I have not read the entire opinion so I may revise my opinion later. SCOTUS does call into question the whole rationale for the electoral college. The framers wanted the electors to use independent judgment in selecting a president. If the electors can not do that then what is their purpose? The case makes a compelling argument to dissolve the electoral college once and for all and elect a president just go on popular vote.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Which is why the Electoral College needs to be abandoned.If the college has the right to overrule the people, what is the purpose of people voting in the first placeThe decision appears to be unanimous with two concurring opinions. I have not read the entire opinion so I may revise my opinion later. SCOTUS does call into question the whole rationale for the electoral college. The framers wanted the electors to use independent judgment in selecting a president. If the electors can not do that then what is their purpose? The case makes a compelling argument to dissolve the electoral college once and for all and elect a president just go on popular vote.
No you don't get it either....it makes the EC be the EC that was intended when enacted....it strengthens it.....No objection to the ruling. That said, it makes the EC almost superfluous.
That will never ever happen....Which is why the Electoral College needs to be abandoned.If the college has the right to overrule the people, what is the purpose of people voting in the first placeThe decision appears to be unanimous with two concurring opinions. I have not read the entire opinion so I may revise my opinion later. SCOTUS does call into question the whole rationale for the electoral college. The framers wanted the electors to use independent judgment in selecting a president. If the electors can not do that then what is their purpose? The case makes a compelling argument to dissolve the electoral college once and for all and elect a president just go on popular vote.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
If you think that this ruling was about states being able to shirk the will of their own voters and send their electors to vote in favor of whoever won the national popular vote, then I'd have to guess you didn't actually read any of the articles about what you're posting.
The decision simply says that the electors can't take it upon themselves to shirk the will of the state that sent them.
I swear, every day it looks more and more like the average lefty sees the first four or five words in a headline and then fills in the narrative themselves based on whatever emotion pops up first.