Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hah hah. I knew one of you lefties would claim that. Why don't you put your money where your mouth is? Would you be in favor of not letting all stupid people vote? I would. I didn't think so because you know darn well Democrats pander to the stupid. But, all you have to do is say, "Yes, I agree. Stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote".That would mean you don't want most Republicans to vote.
I don't want filthy ILLEGALS to vote.You may think you already have such a right, but alas, no.. you don't. Why not? Because, believe it or not, some people here don't want other people being able to vote. Making it the law has actually been tried before and killed by those people. Good a time as any to try again, no?
Then stopI don't want the stupid to vote.
Voting is a right as it is you cannot define the responsibilities so best not to let the feds designate it a right because they'd spend a trillion dollars on some unvettable plan to allow you to vote from home in your PJ'sWhat responsibilities and how would you go about enforcing such requirements?
Be specific....what do you mean by "a fraudulent voter"? Provide data verifying that this type of "fraud" amounts to a significant election issue.
A History of Voter Suppression
VOTER SUPPRESSION IS AN UNFORTUNATE BUT CONSISTENT FEATURE OF THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM. LIMITATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO VOTE WERE CODIFIED IN THE JUNE 2013 CASE OF SHELBY COUNTY V. HOLDER, IN WHICH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT GUTTED THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. THIS DECISION NO LONGER REQUIRED STATES AND...nlihc.org
No, it's clearly not an explicit right, but "unvettable" sure is an interesting (wrong) word choice while changing the subject instead of straightforwardly responding to the question. Many have been voting in their PJs for at least a decade now without incident. Places where people can't do so seem the smart ones to worry about. People from those places are commonly seen fighting like hell just to cast their ballot and getting the runaround.Voting is a right as it is you cannot define the responsibilities so best not to let the feds designate it a right because they'd spend a trillion dollars on some unvettable plan to allow you to vote from home in your PJ's
I don't think that asking for I.D. is suppressing the vote. I think that anything the ACLU endorses is bad for the country. Jon Ossoff is a Democrat so, you can't trust what he says in the first place. EVERY citizen in the U.S. already has access to ballots. Shit, in the last election they MAILED ballots to everyone and you didn't even have ASK for an absentee ballot or show up to the polls!!!You may think you already have such a right, but alas, no.. you don't. Why not? Because, believe it or not, some people here don't want other people being able to vote. Making it the law has actually been tried before and killed by those people. Good a time as any to try again, no?
No, it's clearly not an explicit right, but "unvettable" sure is an interesting (wrong) word choice while changing the subject instead of straightforwardly responding to the question. Many have been voting in their PJs for at least a decade now without incident. Places where people can't do so seem the smart ones to worry about. People from those places are commonly seen fighting like hell just to cast their ballot and getting the runaround.
Voting by mail has saved states and local districts lots of money, especially while the coronavirus made doing everything in public more difficult. Federalizing the process would logically save lots more by standardizing the rules, but that hasn't even been proposed. The 1st Amendment grants us explicit federal rights to speech and assembly. Do we pay too high a cost for those?
Indeed, however one must differentiate between "voter fraud", which has proven insignificant time and again, and vote tampering carried out by election workers and associated officials. Internet connections make such tampering easy, though perhaps not so easy to cover up. Tampering can include allowing partisan hacks to stand around entrances to polling places intimidating voters, gerrymandering, deliberately restricting the number of voting machines available in certain areas, and demanding ID where voter names, addresses, and phone numbers are already well established and affirmed with a compared signature. Mail in ballots have largely begun to eliminate such nonsense, thank goodness.
Wow this seems to be veiled racism. Good thing the country is getting more and more diverse every day.I didn't think so because you know darn well Democrats pander to the stupid.
You are a LIAR. Name any Citizen who is not allowed to vote. And this does NOT include Felons in Prison or on Parole.One only need glance at our long history of slow progress and just imagine the trouble that could have been saved by simply granting a federal right to vote to all U.S. adult citizens to begin with. There are still many U.S. adult citizens who are not permitted to vote for Presidential candidates.
Again, quote where they say we have a federal right to vote (in general), snookums.
Anyone For Making Voting a Federal Right? Still Waiting..
A person who transposes a zip code number on a mail in vote.You are a LIAR. Name any Citizen who is not allowed to vote. And this does NOT include Felons in Prison or on Parole.
There should not BE any mail out votes. That was for COVID. Signatures should be NOTARIZED. And going to the Polls should be easy. Register a month early then get your lazy punk ass to the POLLS.A person who transposes a zip code number on a mail in vote.
A person who does do an exact match when signing a ballot.
A person who fails to vote in one election and is dropped from a voter roll.
So, you want to deny millions of people the right to vote.There should not BE any mail out votes. That was for COVID. Signatures should be NOTARIZED. And going to the Polls should be easy. Register a month early then get your lazy punk ass to the POLLS.
You say that like it's gone or something..There should not BE any mail out votes. That was for COVID.
As long as they get their lazy asses to the polls and are NOT dirty Felons ,everyone should vote. CITIZENS ,that is. No filthy illegals.So, you want to deny millions of people the right to vote.
Clue--There is a Vaccine. And treatments,. Besides ,only those with pre-existing sickness DIE from this. The FLU kills far more young and healthy.You say that like it's gone or something..
U.S. new cases reported yesterday: 280,403
Deaths: 1,725
and rising..
All U.S. citizens are allowed to vote, with the exception of incarcerated convicts. As the Democrats are now pro-criminal, they are advocating for incarcerated convicts to be able to vote. Non-citizens should not be allowed to vote, otherwise you might as well just send out voter ballots to every adult on the planet.You may think you already have such a right, but alas, no.. you don't. Why not? Because, believe it or not, some people here don't want other people being able to vote. Making it the law has actually been tried before and killed by those people. Good a time as any to try again, no?
Are you stupid?All U.S. citizens are allowed to vote, with the exception of incarcerated convicts. As the Democrats are now pro-criminal, they are advocating for incarcerated convicts to be able to vote. Non-citizens should not be allowed to vote, otherwise you might as well just send out voter ballots to every adult on the planet.
