Antisocial darwinism

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,621
138
Eurocentric ideologues reject the American path of fair competition. Instead, they preach their native way of unfair competition, the attack of a pack of dogs on the strong one in order to eliminate the threat of his victory.

There are only 2 ways of selection - honest American and dishonest European. There is no third way, because the food resource is limited.

The American way is the way of heroic victory, the European way is the way of the victory of the villain who joined with other villains in order to avoid a fair fight

 
Eurocentric ideologues reject the American path of fair competition. Instead, they preach their native way of unfair competition, the attack of a pack of dogs on the strong one in order to eliminate the threat of his victory.

There are only 2 ways of selection - honest American and dishonest European. There is no third way, because the food resource is limited.

The American way is the way of heroic victory, the European way is the way of the victory of the villain who joined with other villains in order to avoid a fair fight


It appears that your understanding of history borders on a sort of fantasy or dream. Things are far more intricate than your rather simplistic understanding of them. There have been many good & honest Europeans and lots of evil & dishonest Americans. The bottom line is that both regions have been run by imperfect and flawed men, so none of the victories or conquests were ever perfectly “good.”
 
Eurocentric ideologues reject the American path of fair competition. Instead, they preach their native way of unfair competition, the attack of a pack of dogs on the strong one in order to eliminate the threat of his victory.

There are only 2 ways of selection - honest American and dishonest European. There is no third way, because the food resource is limited.

The American way is the way of heroic victory, the European way is the way of the victory of the villain who joined with other villains in order to avoid a fair fight



This video again? A fantasy film is not history.
 
There are only 2 ways of selection - honest American and dishonest European. There is no third way, because the food resource is limited.

Why do you think food is in short supply here in America? ... it's not ... Lord have mercy, there's no food shortages in America ...

I think the difference is better explained by America never having feudalism as a government ... no nobility ... no "sub-Roman" period ... we filled up with peoples who hated "bending their knee" to another ... something Europeans still do ... watch Megan curtsy to Chuckles III ... too funny ...
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
I think the difference is better explained by America never having feudalism as a government
There has always been feudalism in the USA, there is no system in the world closer to feudalism than the USA. Feudalism is anti-imperial weak centralization, it was in Europe when the aristocratic Knights were in power. Before the obscurantism of the Inquisition and imperialism.
 
There has always been feudalism in the USA, there is no system in the world closer to feudalism than the USA. Feudalism is anti-imperial weak centralization, it was in Europe when the aristocratic Knights were in power. Before the obscurantism of the Inquisition and imperialism.

We have a king? ... since when? ...

=====

In an alternate universe where George Washington accepted the American Crown ... through male-preference primogeniture ... none other than Robert E Lee V would be king today ... the great-great-grandson of the famous Confederate General ...

 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
We have a king? ... since when?
Yes, you have heads of states who are independent of the feds and have great power, like the king - just the first among equals in the konedederation, and an independent police force. In empires, on the contrary, there were henchmen of the metropolis everywhere, and the local aristocracy was destroyed
 
Yes, you have heads of states who are independent of the feds and have great power, like the king - just the first among equals in the konedederation, and an independent police force. In empires, on the contrary, there were henchmen of the metropolis everywhere, and the local aristocracy was destroyed

No, we do not have a king. Every position of power in federal, state and local gov'ts is an elected official. Kings are not elected.
 

Forum List

Back
Top